1/115
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Consequences of Swallowing Impairment (5)
Caregiver burden
Expensive for hospitals
malnutrition
dehydration
aspiration pneumonia
Why Assess Swallowing? (8)
Answer clinical questions
presence or absence of impairment
describe typical and atypical structures and functions affecting swallowing
identify severity
relate impairment to what triggered referral
describe effect of impairment on activities and participation, as well as contextual barriers and facilitators
make prognosis
make recommendations
How do we measure neurophysiology/anatomy?
Indirectly through performance, which is hard
Why do a CSA?
Integrate information
assess structures
identify characteristics of dysphagia
determine need for instrumental assessment
determine candidacy for treatment/management
recommend route for nutritional management
recommend interventions
Parts of a CSA
Medical History
Explanation/Education and informed consent
Case Hx/Client Interview
Observations of communication/cognition
Physical Exam
Trial Swallows/TOMASS and/or Meal Ax
Management Plan/Next Steps/Instrumental Ax
Parts of a Physical Exam
Isometric tongue strength (40kPA lower boundary for adults 60+)
Cough testing (Mini Wright, cough reflex testing)
Trismus Test
Oral Mech
CSA Outcome measures
EAT-10 **
SSQ **
MDADI
DHI
FOIS **
IDDSI-FDS
SWAL-QOL **
CARES
** = came up the most in class
CSA: How to evaluate efficiency
multiple swallows per bolus?
lingual pressure
masticating and swallowing
CSA: How to evaluate safety
voice change, throat clear, cough
peak expiratory flow during volitional cough
The TOMASS is a tool that emphasizes what?
oral bolus prep
What was the TOMASS originally developed for?
A treatment study on swallowing impairment associated with Parkinson’s disease
Instructions for TOMASS
eat cracker as quickly as comfortably possible
say your name out loud when done
record total time, # masticatory cycles, # discrete bites, # swallows
What can we not evaluate using the CSA?
Underlying impairment
Cannot make recommendations about rehab/techniques using CSA alone!
Can we see aspiration or residue in CSA?
No we can’t!
Why is the CSA still important?
Evaluate current functioning and concerns, determine if instrumental eval is needed, and develop hypotheses
Things you can recommend after a csa:
a diet without the need for further testing
further testing
referral to another professional
What can screening NOT do?
determine pharyngeal/laryngeal anatomy/physiology or bolus flow characteristics
What CAN screening do?
determine the presence or absence of aspiration risk
3 things an ideal screening should determine
likelihood of dysphagia and aspiration
further assessment needed?
safe to feed patient orally?
sensitivity (screening)
captures the patients it is intended to capture
specificity (screening)
rules out the patients who do not have the problem
Non Swallowing Items to Assess/Risk Factors
Level of Alertness
Previous Medical Hx
Oral Motor testing
Sensory testing
voice/speech quality
cough
Swallowing items for bolus trials
single swallows of thin liquids
single swallows of various consistencies
consecutive swallows of thin liquids
3oz water test
screening
can be done by many practitioners
drink 3oz through a straw sequentially without stopping
high sensitivity low specificity
patient fails if they can’t finish it. can’t do it without stopping, or show throat clearing, coughing/choking, wet or hoarse voicce up to 1min post
Benefits of Swallow screening
timely ID important for early intervention!!
Identification of dysphagia risk via screening has been shown to (3)
decrease risk of pneumonia
shorten hospital stay
reduce costs
4 puzzle pieces of feeding
social and emotional development
physical, sensory, and oral motor development
communication and cognitive development
mealtimes
Why is feeding important? (6)
nutrition and hydration
growth and development
general health
immunity
social skills
pleasure
Domains of PFD (at least one dysfunctional)
Medical
Psychosocial
Nutritional
Feeding Skills
PFD definition
impaired oral intake that is not age appropriate and dysfunction in at least one domain
Adverse effects of PFD
poor weight gain, growth, malnutrition, FTT
lack of energy, poor development
week immunity
cognitive impairment
emotional dysfunction
poor academic performance
sensory aversions
life threatening conditions
what is the most common reason for late hospital discharge (peds)
inability to oral feed
what is important to know about kids and aspiration?
silent aspirators!!!
Examples of some peds measures
behavioural pediatrics feeding assessment scale
children’s eating behaviour questionnaire
what is cervical auscultation
listening to sounds and vibrations of the throat
this is NOT an instrumental assessment
who can you not assess with VFSS?
breastfeeding infants
manometry
pressure flow and movement in pharyngeal and esophageal phases → research developing
dynamic ultrasound
non invasive
visualize oral muscles/mastication
evidence for tongue movements
ONLY for research
multidisciplinary vs interdisciplinary care
inter = share patients and goals
multi = share patients but working on different goals
common symptoms of swallowing pathology in peds (3)
vomiting/regurgitation/reflux
Crying/discomfort
Changes in vital signs
swallowing is a ____ feeding is a ____
skill, holistic concept
what is a significant factor affecting oral prepardness?
prematurity
compensatory interventions are ___ and habilitative are ____
adaptations, skill development
compensatory approaches (4)
postural modifications
utensils
bolus changes (texture, volume, temp, size)
swallow maneuvers
Creating a positive feeding environment (7)
communication
observe and respond to child
establish healthy attachments
introduce developmentally appropriate texture
avoid unsafe feeding equipment
introduce food play
respect autonomy and independence
Therapeutic strategy examples peds (5)
baby-centred feeding
oral stimulation (chewytubes → good for teaching when you don’t want to use a bolus yet)
phagenesis
SOFFI
SOS feeding
when MBS is indicated (6)
patients symptoms inconsistent with CSA findings
need to confirm suspected diagnosis
confirm a differential diagnosis
nutritional or pulmonary compromise, need to confirm if dysphagia is contributing
safety/efficiency a concern
patient is a rehab candidate → guide treatment
when MBS may be indicated (4)
patient has a condition associated w/ high risk for dysphagia
cognitive or communication deficits = can’t complete CSA
previously diagnosed dysphagia, change in swallow function suspected
patient has a disease with known progression or is in stable or recovering condition → function may require further definition or management
ALARA means
as low as reasonably possible
msV
milliSieverts = how much radiation you receive (like in an MBS)
Gray or milliGray
amount of radiation you were exposed to (will see this re: radiation therapy)
MBS radiation exposure
0.20-0.35 mSv
estimated risk 1 in 39000
optimal frame rate for MBS
at least 30fps (many are lower than this)
barium concentrations adequate for visualization and better “ultrathin”
40% w/v and 22% w/v
DIGEST
Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity Scale
intra-rater reliability good
compatible MBS grade
PCR
Pharyngeal constriction ratio
PCR higher in older afults
high correlation between PCR and peak pharyngeal pressure on manometry
PAS
Penetration Aspiration Scale
measures depth of airway invasion and ejection of material
what does FEES stand for
Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing
what can FEES assess? (4)
velopharyngeal function during speech and swallowing
TVF mobility
Secretions
specific contributing mechanisms of pharyngeal sage (inference of oral and esophageal)
FEES risks (6)
minor side effects (discomfort, vomiting)
epistaxis (nosebleed)
vasovagal syncope (fainting)
laryngospasm (killed Joan rivers)
Reactions to anesthesia (if applied)
Reactions to decongestant (if applied)
FEES Procedure Steps
put in nasal meatus, evaluate velopharyngeal mechanism
move scope into oropharynx
evaluate hypopharynx at rest and secretion management
evaluate base of tongue and pharyngeal function
evaluate laryngeal function
attempted swallows with a range of materials → self feed until there is a problem
examples of secretion scales
Murray (4 point)
Donzelli (5 point)
NZSS (8 point)
Pharyngeal Squeeze Maneuver
judged as normal or abnormal → PCR higher in people with absent PSM, indicates valid measure
What is visible on FEES? (9)
symmetry
base of tongue propulsive movement (infer re: timing)
pharyngeal initiation/delay
penetration before swallow
medialization of pharyngeal walls
medial/anterior movement of arytenoids
epiglottic retroflexion (before and after swallowing)
white out during swallow
bolus retention
3 distinct patterns of abnormality (FEES)
incomplete bolus clearance
misdirected swallow
delayed or mistimed swallow
motor control aspects involved in swallow (5)
briskness of initiation of movement
speed of movement
precision, timing, or coordination of multiple movements
force or strength of the movement
amplitude of the range of movement
What is FEES more sensitive at detecting than MBS?
pharyngeal residue
Components of EBP
Current Best Research Evidence
Client/Patient Values
Clinical expertise
5 factors to consider in treatment planning
empirical evidence
experiential evidence
physiologic rationale
values of patient, family, clinician
system features (economic, legal, cultural)
foundations of treatment
theoretically sound and follow accepted principles of neuroplasticity and motor learning
supported by empirical evidence as much as possible
set realistic treatment goals
when there is a lack of evidence what should you use?
a theory driven approach
Where should you start when planning treatment?
Identify the main driver of impairment (there may be lots going on at once, see what will give you the most bang for your buck)
Guiding principles of treatment (4)
fundamentals of training and exercise
principles of neural plasticity
principles of motor learning
motor adaptation and feed-back/feed-forward loops
isometric vs isotonic
isometric = muscles stay the same length, static
isotonic = dynamic exercise
Three pillars of management
compensation
rehabilitation
prevention
what is the problem with aspiration pneumonia?
there is no agreed upon definition, diagnosis can be circular, you can get it because of lots of other things that aren’t diet related → is every pneumonia just an AP?
three pillars of aspiration pneumonia
impaired health status
impaired airway protection
impaired oral environment
VAP
ventilator association pneumonia
leading cause for nosocomial infection in ICU
should you use chlorohexidine in critically ill patients?
nope! may cause excess mortality AND fail to prevent VAP
outcome for oral health example
OHAT (Oral Health Ax Tool)
patients w/ dysphagia had sig worse oral health scores at beginning of study
how many cases of death from pneumonia in nursing home residents could be prevented by improving oral hygiene?
1/10
Elements of Rehab Treatment specification system
Target (aspect of functioning targeted directly for change)
Mechanism of Action (How the treatment is expected to work)
Ingredients (what the clinician does or selects)
compensatory maneuvers (5)
Head extension
head flexion-chin tuck
head rotation
head turn to side of deficit
head tilt to strong side
options without evidence (4)
multiple swallows
liquid wash
voluntary cough
voluntary throat clear
adjustments that can be rehab or compensatory
Supraglottic swallow
super-supraglottic swallow (can induce valsalva*)
effortful swallow
Mendelsohn Maneuver
examples of sensory stimulation
thermal tactile (V and IX)
increased pressure with spoon (V and IX)
sour
bolus requiring chewing
larger bolus volume (V and IX)
smell
flavour
carbonation
who are thin liquids most difficult for?
reduced oral control and delayed pharyngeal swallow
what can thin liquids be useful for?
reduced peristalsis (to wash residue) and UES disorders (to increase flow through UES)
thickened liquids for:
mildly reduced oral control and mild delay in pharyngeal stage
ppl who would be at risk w/ thin fluids
pudding for:
moderate delay in pharyngeal stage and aspiration potential, reduced laryngeal closure → may be hard if they have oral/pharyngeal weakness (residue)
Pureed for:
like pudding: moderate delay in pharyngeal stage and aspiration potential, reduced laryngeal closure → may be hard if they have oral/pharyngeal weakness (residue)
mechanically altered means
cohesive, moist, semisolid
requires some chewing
2 main alternate modes of feeding
enteral (GI tract functional)
Parenteral (GI tract not functional → TPN)
kinds of enteral nutritional support (3)
gastronomy (PEG) → percutaneous endoscopic gastronomy
jejunostomy → into jejunum (small intestine)
nasogastric (NG) → preferred for short term use
parenteral nutritional support
TPN → via a central vein, sterile procedure performed at bedside
PPN → via a peripheral vein, feeding required 7-10 days
who are feeding tubes not recommended for?
adults with advanced dementia
Rehab Exercises
Shaker (Head lift)
Modified head lift (recline)
Masako (risky prob won’t use on exam lol)
Lingual strengthening tool
IOPI
Expiratory Muscle Strength Training
studies in patients with parkinson’s ALS, stroke, MS, HNC
5 sets 5 reps 5 days per week 4 weeks
sEMG Biofeedback
displays actiivty from muscles involved in swallowing
enhance learning and peformance