1/22
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
emotional appeal
appealing to emotions like love, fear, or pity rather than logic
ethical appeal
appeals to the audience’s sense of morality
concession
acknowledging on the opposing point before refuting it with a counterargument
loaded words
using emotionally charged words with strong positive or negative connotations to sway an opinion
analogy
drawing a comparison between two similar situations to support a point — similes and metaphors for example
anecdote
using a brief short personal story to illustrate an argument
deduction
reasoning that moves from a general premise to a specific conclusion
hyperbole
exaggeration used for emphasis or persuasion
understatement
deliberately downplaying a situation to make it seem less serious (irony)
parallelism
repeating sentence structure for emphasis and rhetorical effectp
rhetorical question
posing a question with an obvious and compelling answer to persuade an audience
ad hominem
attacking a persona instead of addressing their argument
ad populum
arguing that something must be true or right because a lot of other people believe or do it as
appeal to authority/prestige
assuming an idea is true because an authority figure or someone with status supports it
appeal to fear
using fear rather than logical reasoning to convince an audience
begging the question
assuming something is true without providing evidence
either/or reasing
oversimplifying an issue by presenting only two options
generalization
drawing a broad conclusion based on insufficient evidence or too few examples
non sequitur
making a conclusion that does not logically follow from the previous statements
post hoc, ergo propter hoc
assuming that because one event follows another, the first must have caused the second ( correlation does not equal causation)
red herring
introducing an unrelated or secondary topic to divert the attention from the main issue
poisoning the well
using loaded language to negatively frame a topic before discussing it
straw man
misrepresenting an opponent’s argument to make it easier to refute