1/17
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Kitty Genovese murder
Kitty Genovese is stalked and murdered by Winston Moseley in Kew Gardens, New York City → police commissioner claims that 38 witneses had refused to intervene
5 step cognitive model
Notice that something is happening
Interpret the event as an emergency
Take responsibility for providing help
Decide how to act
Provide help
Bystander hypothesis
The more bystanders there are, the less emergency help due to 2 processes → pluralistic ignorance and diffusion of responsibility
The white smoke experiment
N = 58 male Columbia University undergraduates
Cover Story: Problems involved in life at an urban unversity
Asked to sit in a ‘waiting room’ and fill in a survey
Room begins to fill with an invisible (harmless) white smoke
Independent Variable → Group size: Participant alone / Participant with two others
Others: Confederates who do not react / Naïve participants
Dependent Variable → Behavioural response to emergency
What 2 factors were considered in terms of the behavioural response to emergency
Did the participant leave the room to report the smoke? (yes/no)
How many minutes did it take until the person reports?
Findings of white smoke experiement
Findings (Crucial Data Points):
Alone: 75% reported the smoke (55% within 2 minutes).
Two Naive Participants: 38% reported the smoke (only 12% within 2 minutes).
Two Passive Confederates: Only 10% reported the smoke (10% within 2 minutes).
The seizure experiment
N = 72 New York University undergraduate Psychology students
Cover Story: Discussion about personal problems of students while at uni
Seated in one of several small rooms – to supposedly retain anonymity
Can hear ‘other discussants’ (actually recordings) through headphones and communicate via intercom in turns
Emergency event: One ‘discussant’ admits to being prone to seizures, and expresses distress when it is his turn again […I’m gonna die-er-er … help-er-er-seizure (chokes, then quiet)]
Independent variable → group size: 1, 2, or 6 ‘others’
Dependent variable → behavioural response to emergency
Findings of the seizure experiment
The speed and likelihood of responding dropped significantly as perceived group size increased
Debate around Kitty Genovese murder
Court proceedings suggest far fewer, and only 3 people who saw Moseley and Genovese together
Culturally-embedded theorising
Criticism → researchers have failed to translate this gender aspect of the Kitty Genovese case into their experiments
CCTV stucies
Criticism → Latane and Darley studies do not examine violent situations as in the Kitty Genovese case
Follow-up study using CCTV footage (Levine et al., 2011)
42 CCTV clips from a city in Northwest of England
Key findings → number of bystanders correlates with more concilatory behaviour and sequence of event is important
Social identiy of bystander
Criticism → the study does not examine the relationship between the victim, the bystanders ad perpertrators
Social inhibition
Likelihood that a bystander helps
Latane & Nida meta analysis
Review of 50 studies
Probability of helping in a group = 22%
Probability of helping alone = 50%
Conclusion = the bystander effect has “withstood the tests of time and replication”
Fischer et al meta analysis
First quantitative (statistical meta analysis) of the bystander effect
105 studies and 7,700 participants
Overall effect size → g = -0.35 (small to moderate effect)
Effect stronger when non-dangerous, perpertrator not present, non physical costs
Bystander and ally training
Many interventions include a component on how to encourage bystanders to get involved, however, the group is often conceptualised as an inhibitor rather than a resource
Beyond emergency help
Charitable giving → Lee et al., 2017
Collective action → Saab et al., 2015
Witnesses to a crime → Huston et al., 1981
“Whistleblowrs” → Gao et al., 2015
International aid → Lim & Barnett, 2009