10a. Latane and Darley

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/17

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 6:40 PM on 5/12/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

18 Terms

1
New cards

Kitty Genovese murder

Kitty Genovese is stalked and murdered by Winston Moseley in Kew Gardens, New York City → police commissioner claims that 38 witneses had refused to intervene

2
New cards

5 step cognitive model

  1. Notice that something is happening

  2. Interpret the event as an emergency

  3. Take responsibility for providing help

  4. Decide how to act

  5. Provide help

3
New cards

Bystander hypothesis

The more bystanders there are, the less emergency help due to 2 processes → pluralistic ignorance and diffusion of responsibility

4
New cards

The white smoke experiment

  • N = 58 male Columbia University undergraduates

  • Cover Story: Problems involved in life at an urban unversity

  • Asked to sit in a ‘waiting room’ and fill in a survey

  • Room begins to fill with an invisible (harmless) white smoke

  • Independent Variable → Group size: Participant alone / Participant with two others

    • Others: Confederates who do not react / Naïve participants

  • Dependent Variable → Behavioural response to emergency

5
New cards

What 2 factors were considered in terms of the behavioural response to emergency

  1. Did the participant leave the room to report the smoke? (yes/no)

  2. How many minutes did it take until the person reports?

6
New cards

Findings of white smoke experiement

  • Findings (Crucial Data Points):

    • Alone: 75% reported the smoke (55% within 2 minutes).

    • Two Naive Participants: 38% reported the smoke (only 12% within 2 minutes).

    • Two Passive Confederates: Only 10% reported the smoke (10% within 2 minutes).

7
New cards

The seizure experiment

  • N = 72 New York University undergraduate Psychology students

  • Cover Story: Discussion about personal problems of students while at uni

  • Seated in one of several small rooms – to supposedly retain anonymity

  • Can hear ‘other discussants’ (actually recordings) through headphones and communicate via intercom in turns

  • Emergency event: One ‘discussant’ admits to being prone to seizures, and expresses distress when it is his turn again […I’m gonna die-er-er … help-er-er-seizure (chokes, then quiet)]

  • Independent variable → group size: 1, 2, or 6 ‘others’

  • Dependent variable → behavioural response to emergency

8
New cards

Findings of the seizure experiment

The speed and likelihood of responding dropped significantly as perceived group size increased

9
New cards

Debate around Kitty Genovese murder

Court proceedings suggest far fewer, and only 3 people who saw Moseley and Genovese together

10
New cards

Culturally-embedded theorising

Criticism → researchers have failed to translate this gender aspect of the Kitty Genovese case into their experiments

11
New cards

CCTV stucies

Criticism → Latane and Darley studies do not examine violent situations as in the Kitty Genovese case

12
New cards

Follow-up study using CCTV footage (Levine et al., 2011)

  • 42 CCTV clips from a city in Northwest of England

  • Key findings → number of bystanders correlates with more concilatory behaviour and sequence of event is important

13
New cards

Social identiy of bystander

Criticism → the study does not examine the relationship between the victim, the bystanders ad perpertrators

14
New cards

Social inhibition

Likelihood that a bystander helps

15
New cards

Latane & Nida meta analysis

  • Review of 50 studies

  • Probability of helping in a group = 22%

  • Probability of helping alone = 50%

  • Conclusion = the bystander effect has “withstood the tests of time and replication”

16
New cards

Fischer et al meta analysis

  • First quantitative (statistical meta analysis) of the bystander effect

  • 105 studies and 7,700 participants

  • Overall effect size → g = -0.35 (small to moderate effect)

  • Effect stronger when non-dangerous, perpertrator not present, non physical costs

17
New cards

Bystander and ally training

Many interventions include a component on how to encourage bystanders to get involved, however, the group is often conceptualised as an inhibitor rather than a resource

18
New cards

Beyond emergency help

  • Charitable giving → Lee et al., 2017

  • Collective action → Saab et al., 2015

  • Witnesses to a crime → Huston et al., 1981

  • “Whistleblowrs” → Gao et al., 2015

  • International aid → Lim & Barnett, 2009