1/8
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
What is hegemony and who argues how can the working class overcome this?
Hegemony is dominance through ideas rather than force. This is used by the ruling upper class to dominate the working class.
Gramsci argues can over come this because they have a dual consciousness - a mixture of ruling class ideology and ideas they develop from their own direct experience of exploitation and their struggles against it.
Gramsci argues this requires a political party of organic intellectuals - workers who through their anti capitalist struggles have developed class consciousness
What is a counter argument to the idea that the working class is exploited is due to hegemony?
Abercrombie argues many do not rebel due to fear of economic factors such as unemployment
What is nationalism and one criticism?
Nationalism is a political ideology that has had a major impact on the world for 200 years now. Nationalism claims that
Nations are real, distinctive communities each with its own unique characteristics and a long, shared history
Every nation should be self-governing
National loyalty and identity should come before all other, such as tribe, class and religion
However, Anderson argues that a nation is only an ‘imagined community’. Although we can identity it, we will never know most of its other members. This imagined community can bind millions of strangers together and create a sense of common purpose
What would Marx argue about nationalism?
Marx was a nationalist that argues nationalism is a form of false class consciousness that helps prevent the overthrow of capitalism by dividing the international working class.
Nationalism encourages workers to believe they have more in common with the capitalists of their own country than the workers of other countries. This has enabled the ruling class of each capitalist country to persuade the working class to fight wars on their behalf.
How do functionalist see nationalsim?
They see it as a secular civil religion. Like religion, it integrates individuals into larger social and political units by making them feel part of something greater than themselves.
In modern secular societies people may be unwilling to believe in supernatural beings but may be willing to see themselves as part of a nation. Modern societies has multiple different religions so nationalism functions as a civil religion that unites everyone into one single nation.
How does Ernest Gellner explain the rise of nationalism?
Nationalism is false consciousness — it falsely claims nations are ancient, but they are modern.
Pre-industrial society was based on small, face-to-face communities with fixed hierarchies (ascribed status), not nationalism.
Industrialisation created large, impersonal societies with division of labour and legal equality.
Modern states need shared communication → mass education imposes a single national language and culture.
Nationalism promotes equality and cooperation between strangers.
Elites use nationalism to motivate people to endure hardship during early industrialisation and enable modernisation.
How does Mannheim explain ideology and utopian thought?
All belief systems are partial worldviews — shaped by the interests of specific groups or classes.
Two types of worldview:
Ideological thought
Justifies keeping things as they are (status quo).
Reflects interests of privileged groups (e.g. capitalist class).
Conservative and supports hierarchy.
Utopian thought
Justifies social change.
Reflects interests of the underprivileged.
Offers a vision of a different society (e.g. Marxism aiming for a classless society).
Worldviews are created by intellectuals aligned with particular classes (e.g. Gramsci’s organic intellectuals).
Because they represent specific interests, they produce only partial truths.
What solution does Mannheim propose to overcome ideological conflict, and what is a criticism of it?
Mannheim argues intellectuals should detach from the social groups they represent.
This would create a “free-floating intelligentsia” standing above class conflict.
Freed from group interests, they could combine elements of different ideologies.
This would produce a more “total” worldview representing society as a whole.
Evaluation:
Many ideologies are fundamentally opposed (e.g. Marxism vs conservatism).
It is difficult to see how such conflicting ideas could realistically be synthesised.
How do feminists explain the role of religion and science in maintaining gender inequality + criticism
Science as ideology:
19th-century male doctors and scientists claimed education would make women “unfeminine”.
Argued women’s “true vocation” was motherhood and nurturing.
Used science to exclude women from education.
Religion as ideology:
Many religions portray women as inferior or ritually impure (e.g. menstruation, childbirth).
Practices like “churching” reinforced this inferiority.
Evaluation:
Not all religions subordinate women.
Some early religions were matriarchal with female deities and priests.
In Hinduism, goddesses are sometimes portrayed as creators of the universe.