1/108
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Finance
how businesses raise capital, invest in assets, and manage financial risk
Connects to strategy, leadership, environments, the economy, industry, politics, competition, etc.
Considers assessment of risk (risk tolerance)
Transaction
company spends money on something or company gets money to spend
Relationship between time and money: making money
invest early because today’s money is worth more than tomorrow’s money
Relationship between time and money: costing money
borrowing money today will require you to pay back more later
Present value
amount you need to invest today to achieve a specific future value
PV = FV/(1 + r)n
Future value
amount in the future if invested today
FV = PV * (1 + r)n
Discounting
for $X later, how much do you need now?
Compounding
for $X now, how much will you have later?
Interest
price paid for use of borrowed money (how much it costs to borrow money)
generally, lower interest rate means lower risk
Simple interest
paid only on the principal
E.g. $1000 for 5 years at 5% --> $50/year * 5 years = $1250
Compound interest
earn interest on principal and reinvested interest (whatever else you earned)
E.g. $1000 for 5 years at 5% --> $50 + $52.50 + $55.13 + $57.88 + $60.77 = $1276.28 (same as FV)
Principal
the amount of money you're giving or getting
Rule of 72
72/x% = n years
Simple way to see how long is take to double your money
Budgeting
long-term capital projects = 5-10 years building something
strategic direction: growth vs stability
alignment with the company’s long-term goals
Valuation decisions guide investments
Today's money vs tomorrow's money
Decisions based on comparisons/alternatives
Operations
designing, planning, managing, and improving the processes that convert materials and labor into goods and services as efficiently as possible
part of ITO, connected to structure and leadership, and linked to customer value and utility
Three aspects of operations
operational
management
supporting
Two components of operational effectiveness
Productivity and efficiency
Productivity
outputs/inputs
the more outputs for each input, the more productive
Same store year-over-year sales
productivity for a retail company
compare numbers of stores to revenue every year
Efficiency
optimize ITO process
actual/standard output
Process design to optimize workflow and procedures
map the entire process out in steps
analyze efficiency (quantitative or qualitatitve)
design/improve process
Logistics
movement of goods and services through the entire process (to the operations, operations, from operations)
Supply chain management
all activities for producing and delivering
systems (ITO) and resources (stuff needed to make the supply chain happen and prevent breaking down)
internal (operations/ITO) and external (logistics and supply chain)
broader, strategic
The big players of supply chain management
Supply chain: Unilever (provides food to 190 countries), Walmart (100,000+ suppliers)
Logistics: DHL (ship 1.7 billion parcels per year), UPS (has a logistics hub of 5.2M ft2 that processes 115 packages per second)
Just in Case (JIC)
inventory → having everything in stock
trades up-front cost for availability
need to be sure that you need the thing, can store it, and will be able to sell it
e.g. Ford
Just in Time (JIT)
the thing arrives exactly when you need it
cuts out the storage, no need for warehouse or inventory
trade savings (don’t need to store) for risk (if the supply chain breaks down)
JIC vs. JIT
Most companies now do a hybrid of JIC and JIT
Mostly JIT but with a few things in their pocket in case something goes wrong (addition of JIC since pandemic)
e.g. Honda
Impacts of operations
context → what industry you're in, how much can you drive the price down, how much can you save (e.g. Costco vs a bank)
design → how important it is to you, the structure (e.g. Costco vs Prada)
Equifinality of operations
Slightly less equifinal than other areas
Power
the extent to which A can get B to do something they would not otherwise do
Characteristics of power
relational and dynamic
irrelevant unless used
down, up, and side-to-side influence
always a cost
evolves/changes in response to design and context
Five types of power (French and Raven)
reward
coercive
legitimate
expert
referent
Effective leaders will use different combinations of these types of power with different kinds of people in different situations
Reward power
get B to do something by A giving them something
the more B doesn’t want to do it, the more it’s going to cost A
Coercive power
if B doesn't do something because they didn’t want to do, A takes something away from B
Legitimate power
get B to do something because A is the boss
similar to Weber’s rational-legal authority, very business oriented
Expert power
A knows more about this than B does, so B will do it because A said to
A has the knowledge, B doesn’t
Referent power
B does something because they like A
same as Weber’s charismatic authority
Control
managing member self-interests so that they align with the organization's needs
Techniques for control
don’t suppress, align self-interests with the organization’s
goal is not uniformity, but to minimize random behavior
dynamic → pick the best strategy depending on context
Types of control
process
agency
market
bureaucratic
clan
Process control
Goal-alignment through rewards
Series of steps that inform the employee how to get rewarded (sets expectations; can leave if they dislike/disagree)
e.g. UVA’s hiring process and classes
Agency control
owners empower managers through agents
this is how all publicly owned companies are run
e.g. Google’s board members
Market control
free-market/consumers influences the company
consumer actions (giving money, boycotting) are a way to try to influence the organization
least common
e.g. GoFundMe, Target pride collection protests
Bureaucratic control
Interests are lined up through rules and registrations (Weber’s bureaucracy)
Use guidelines to get interests of A more similar to B
e.g. U.S. SEC
Clan control
cultures, values, norms, shared beliefs influence the way you act
organization's self-interest of getting employees lined up with their goals and employees' self-interest of fitting in
very common and very powerful
Leadership
not just one definition
partly the individual, partly the context
Four main approaches to leadership
leadership is traits
leadership is behavior
leadership is problem-solving
leadership is influence
Leadership is traits
the earliest understanding of leadership
Great Man approaches
leadership is something about the person
No combination of "key traits" works best
important traits regardless: cognitive capacity, social capacity, personality, expertise
Cognitive capacity (as a leadership trait)
being able to figure things out; identify characteristics of a problem, formulate a solution, implement the solution to the problem
Social capacity (as a leadership trait)
connect with people, self-monitoring (reading the room, paying attention to themselves), situational awareness, self-awareness
Personality (as a leadership trait)
openness to new experiences, perspectives, ideas; conscientiousness
Expertise (as a leadership trait)
knowing about/what it is you’re doing
Leadership is behaviors
what leaders do
initiating structure (task), consideration (people), change (reacting to the environment)
no combination works best
specific traits regardless: direction setting, boundary spanning, operations
Direction setting (as a leadership behavior)
the vision, where this business is going
Boundary spanning (as a leadership behavior)
looking out of the organization, evaluating connections outside of the organization (stakeholders, constituents)
Operations (as a leadership behavior)
paying attention to operations to understand how it affects the organization and the environment
Leadership is problem-solving
evaluates the main task of a leader (solving problems)
combines traits and behaviors
boundary spanning/monitoring
planning and strategizing
very useful in dynamic environments
Leadership is influence
the goal of a leader is to get people to do stuff
activate higher-order needs
Identify what employees want and figure out how high it can be taken
get everyone to work in the same direction
Most helpful when the goal is getting everyone past the basics and working towards a bigger thing
ethical and moral characteristics (socialized/positive or personalized/negative charisma)
very useful in uncertain environments
How to activate higher-order needs
Align individual and organization goals
Motivation
Individualized consideration -- take into account each person they're trying to lead/motivate on an individual basis
What/who decides leaders
environment
stable = task-oriented leaders
unstable = influential leaders
history/tradition
context/generalizing characteristics or traits
individuals can choose their leaders
Human resources
policies, practices, and systems organizations use to acquire, select, train, appraise, reward, develop, and terminate while complying with legal and cultural requirements
(everything to get people into the organization and doing their jobs)
Objectives of HR
improve performance and avoid mistakes (find good employees, provide good training, provide good compensation → improve quality of work)
Evolution of “HR”
Labor Relations → Personnel → HR → Strategic HR
Contexts changing HR
globalization (increasing)
changing nature of work — how people do their work and what they’re doing (e.g. less jobs of physically doing something)
changing nature of the workforce — demographics of labor, depends on country and industry
technology (e.g. AI)
How the law affects HR
everything in HR is affected by legal
Discrimination
employment decisions (selection, training, reward, promotion, termination) based on something other than job qualifications (race, gender, disability)
Disparate Impact
when there seems to be evidence of discrimination
A business’s defense to a disparate impact
business necessity — requirement of the business/job
bona fide occupational qualifications (BFOQ) — only people who are ____ can do this job
validity — test predicts performance (most acceptable)
Legal acts against discrimination
the 5th and 14th Amendments
Civil Rights Act (1964, 1991)
Age Discrimination Acts (1967, 1978, 1984, 1986, 1987)
Americans with Disabilities Act (1990)
Supreme Court cases
The 5th and 14th Amendments
both say: “laws apply the same to everyone”
Civil Rights Act
Addressed the loopholes companies created to get around the 5th and 14th amendments
Title 7 → prohibited employment discrimination based on race, gender, color, religion
Title 9 → prohibited education discrimination based on gender
Age Discrimination Acts
protects workers over the age of 40, with some exceptions (e.g. pilots)
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
prohibited employment discrimination based on disability (otherwise qualified individuals)
reasonable accommodation → assistive technology, curb cutouts, speakers, etc.
Key functions of HR
job analysis
Job analysis
the purposeful, systematic process for collecting information about the important work-related aspects of a job
outlines job descriptions, tests, training, performance management, promotions, career development plans
looks at individual characteristics (personality traits), tasks (what employees do), duties (responsibilities), behaviors (e.g. motivation)
Motivation
the psychological force that directs and maintains an individual's goal-directed efforts, including intensity, persistence, and direction of behavior
one tool that can be used to align goals of the organization and the workers
Intrinsic motivation
internal motivation; doing it because it's something you want to do (e.g. self-satisfaction, sense of pride)
Extrinsic motivation
external motivation (e.g. a pay raise, benefits)
What motivates people
money, promotions (extrinsic)
accomplishment, recognition, sense of pride, awards, sense of belongingness (intrinsic)
equity theory
expectancy theory
Equity theory
Inputsme/outputsme vs. inputsothers/outputsothers
comparing ourselves to others
motivation = inequity/our inputs and outputs are out of balance with those of others
Expectancy theory
likelihood of valued outcomes
motivation = the possible rewards
the higher the probability and/or the more valuable the outcome, the more motivation
How to motivate
S.M.A.R.T. goals
behavior modification/training
job design (rotate and enrich)
increase/enhance rewards (extrinsic motivations)
S.M.A.R.T. goals
Specific → clear
Measurable → quantifiable
Achievable → doable given time and resources
Relevant → align with objectives
Time-bound → deadline/timeline
Conflict
people + power
clash between goal-directed behaviors (good or bad)
can improve effectiveness
key is managing the “good” and the “bad”
relationship is not linear
Sources of conflict
resource scarcity (competition)
incompatible goals (organizational and individual goals are inherently conflicting → compromise)
structural (e.g. reward system)
poor communication → try to change through training, selection, reward system, feedback
Stages of conflict
latent
perceived
felt
manifest
resolution
aftermath
Stages of conflict: latent conflict
Conflict is always there, just maybe not clashing at the moment
E.g. employee wants to get paid a lot, organization wants to pay workers as little as possible
Stages of conflict: perceived conflict
One party notices the conflict, that goals are not aligned
E.g. worker notices someone is getting paid more to do the same thing as them with the same amount of experience
Stages of conflict: felt conflict
Both parties feel the conflict; the other party recognizes it as well
E.g. boss notices unhappy worker and reaches out; someone brings the unhappy worker to the boss’s attention
Stages of conflict: manifest
One or both parties does something about the conflict (result of the conflict)
E.g. workers going on strike
Stages of conflict: resolution
The conflict is resolved (negotiation, conversation, argument, physical altercation, etc.)
E.g. boss gives a raise, rejects the request, defers the conversation
Stages of conflict: aftermath
feeds back into step 1 → latent conflict goes down (e.g. pay raise) or up (e.g. raise is rejected)
Conflict management styles
competing
avoiding
accommodating
compromising
collaborating
Conflict management style: competing
win/lose
fast way to resolve conflict
less successful in the long run because it increases latent conflict
Conflict management style: avoiding
run away
raises latent conflict
not suitable for businesses because conflict needs to be dealt with
Conflict management style: accommodating
for you
works if its not a big issue, you don’t really care, may get you some points in the future with the person
for small day-to-day things, not big issues or goal conflicts
Conflict management style: compromising
satisficing
each party gets some and gives up other stuff
Conflict management style: collaborating
win/win
the ideal management style
negotiate, collaborate, work together, and both sides win
takes more time and effort
most successful in the long run because it creates the least amount of latent conflict
Decision-making
the process of responding to a problem by searching for and selecting the best course of action
dynamism (environment) and risk tolerance (the individual) affect choices