Property Law Consolidated Reference Flashcards

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/50

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Comprehensive vocabulary flashcards covering Property Law topics including Easements, Nuisance, Takings, Adverse Possession, Finding, Initial Acquisition, Gifts, and Future Interests based on the lecture notes.

Last updated 1:57 AM on 5/2/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

51 Terms

1
New cards

Dominant Estate

The parcel or holder that benefits from an easement.

2
New cards

Servient Estate

The parcel that is burdened by an easement.

3
New cards

Easement

A nonpossessory interest that benefits a dominant estate or holder and burdens a servient estate.

4
New cards

Appurtenant vs. In Gross

A comparison of easements based on whether the benefit is attached to land (appurtenant) or to a person (in gross).

5
New cards

Prescriptive Easement

An easement arising from open, notorious, adverse, and continuous use for the statutory period, usually creating a use right rather than full title.

6
New cards

Willard v. First Church of Christ, Scientist

A case that rejects the old common-law bar on reserving an easement to a third party, allowing such reservations based on the grantor's intent.

7
New cards

Express Easement

An easement created by a written grant or reservation that identifies the burdened land, the benefited interest, and authorized use.

8
New cards

Easement by Necessity

An easement that arise on severance when commonly owned land leaves a parcel landlocked or unusable without access.

9
New cards

Easement by Prior Use

An implied easement arising on severance when a formerly unified parcel had an apparent, continuous, preexisting use that is reasonably necessary.

10
New cards

Easement by Estoppel

Also known as an irrevocable license, it arises when a landowner permits use under circumstances that foreseeably induce substantial reliance.

11
New cards

Brown v. Voss

A case illustrating that an easement appurtenant created for one dominant parcel does not automatically expand to benefit an additional non-dominant parcel.

12
New cards

Brandt

A case highlighting that some railroad rights of way are easements that terminate upon abandonment rather than leaving a reversionary interest in the government.

13
New cards

Negative Easements

Historically narrow categories limited to light, air, support, and stream flow.

14
New cards

Private Nuisance

A substantial and unreasonable nontrespassory interference with another's use and enjoyment of land.

15
New cards

Public Nuisance

Interference with rights common to the public; private plaintiffs ordinarily require a special injury distinct from the public to maintain the action.

16
New cards

Spur Industries, Inc. v. Del E. Webb Development Co.

A case involving public nuisance where a developer who "brought people to the nuisance" had to indemnify the defendant for costs of moving or shutting down.

17
New cards

Unreasonableness Factors (Nuisance)

Assessment turns on gravity of harm, avoidability, locality suitability, and competing utility of the activity.

18
New cards

Boomer v. Atlantic Cement Co.

A case allowing a nuisance to continue upon payment of permanent damages instead of an injunction when shutting down is dramatically costly.

19
New cards

Estancias Dallas Corp. v. Schultz

A case where a court may enjoin a nuisance when hardship to neighbors and residential settings justify a property-rule remedy despite the defendant's costs.

20
New cards

Property Rule vs. Liability Rule

A distinction by Calabresi and Melamed explaining remedies; property rules usually imply injunctions while liability rules imply court-set damages.

21
New cards

Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City

Ad hoc balancing for regulatory takings focused on economic impact, investment-backed expectations, and the character of the government action.

22
New cards

Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council

A per se rule for regulatory takings when a regulation deprives land of all economically beneficial use, subject to background principles.

23
New cards

Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.

A per se taking rule for government-authorized permanent physical occupations, regardless of the size or economic impact.

24
New cards

Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon (Penn Coal)

Establishes the foundational idea that regulation can become a taking if it goes "too far."

25
New cards

Kelo v. City of New London

Broadly reads the federal public-use requirement to include public purposes such as redevelopment.

26
New cards

Just Compensation

Ordinarily measured as the fair market value of what is taken, excluding subjective or idiosyncratic attachment.

27
New cards

Exactions

Government-imposed permit conditions that must satisfy an essential nexus (Nollan) and rough proportionality (Dolan).

28
New cards

Right to Exclude

Considered the central property entitlement in physical-takings and exactions cases.

29
New cards

Adverse Possession

Acquisition of title through hostile, actual, open and notorious, exclusive, and continuous possession for the statutory period.

30
New cards

Tacking

The combination of successive possessors' periods of use to satisfy the statutory period for adverse possession.

31
New cards

Open and Notorious

Possession visible enough that a reasonable owner would have notice of the claimant acting like an owner.

32
New cards

Hostility

Possession without the true owner's permission; mental state requirements vary by state (good faith versus objective).

33
New cards

Lost vs. Mislaid vs. Abandoned Property

Classification determining priority: lost property favors the finder; mislaid property favors the premises owner as bailee; abandoned property returns to first possession.

34
New cards

Relativity of Title (Armory v. Delamirie)

The principle that a finder has a possessory title good against everyone except the true owner.

35
New cards

Hannah v. Peel

A case giving the finder priority over a landowner when the item is lost and the landowner never physically possessed the premises.

36
New cards

First Possession

The baseline rule for allocating previously unowned resources based on the legal level of control or possession achieved.

37
New cards

Pierson v. Post

The rule that wild animal capture requires actual bodily seizure, mortal wounding with continued pursuit, or certain control; pursuit alone is insufficient.

38
New cards

Keeble v. Hickeringill

The principle that malicious interference with a person's lawful, profit-seeking effort to capture wild animals is actionable.

39
New cards

Discovery Doctrine (Johnson v. M'Intosh)

A rule that gave European sovereigns the exclusive right to acquire land from Indigenous nations, leaving the latter with occupancy but not alienable title.

40
New cards

Ghen v. Rich

A case recognizing title based on settled industry custom instead of immediate physical possession.

41
New cards

Inter Vivos Gift

A valid gift requires present donative intent, delivery (actual, constructive, or symbolic), and acceptance.

42
New cards

Gift Causa Mortis

A gift made in contemplation of imminent death; it is revocable if the donor survives the peril.

43
New cards

Gruen v. Gruen

A case holding that a donor can make a present gift of title while retaining a life estate in possession.

44
New cards

Life Estate

An estate that gives present possession for a measuring life, subject to the doctrine of waste.

45
New cards

Rule Against Perpetuities (RAP)

A test of whether future interests must vest within 2121 years after a life in being at creation, or within a 9090-year wait-and-see period.

46
New cards

Fee Simple Absolute

The modern default estate; it exists unless the grant language clearly creates a smaller or defeasible estate.

47
New cards

Fee Simple Determinable (FSD)

An estate using durational language (e.g., "until") that ends automatically and leaves a possibility of reverter in the grantor.

48
New cards

Fee Simple Subject to Condition Subsequent (FSSCS)

An estate using conditional language (e.g., "but if") that requires the grantor to exercise a right of entry to terminate possession.

49
New cards

Vested Remainder

A future interest given to an ascertained taker not subject to a condition precedent other than the natural end of the prior estate.

50
New cards

Contingent Remainder

A remainder where the taker is unascertained or must satisfy a condition precedent before entitlement to possession.

51
New cards

Executory Interest

A future interest in a transferee that divests another interest or follows a condition in a way that prevents possession at the natural end of a prior estate.