1/17
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
What is collusion?
It can take different forms:
agree on sales price
allocate quotas among themselves
Divide markets
Collusive practices allow firm to exert market power, artificially restrict competition and increase prices to reduce welfare
When is deviation from a collusive agreement less likely?
When the market is small
when sellers prices are observable
when deviation is detectable
when punishment is high
Folk Theorem
Freidman 1971 - When economic agents do not discount the future heavily in infinity horizons, firms can have any profit from 0 to the fully collusive profit
Factors affecting collusion
V(D) down, future value of deviating - collusion more likely
PI (D) down, today’s deviating profits - collusion more likely
PI (C) up, today’s collusive profits - collusion more likely
number of firms goes up, collusion less likely
Future discount rate goes up, collusion less likely
improved observability of competitor’s pricing facilitates collusion
Lagged timing (like more periods before deviating from the cartel is revealed) makes collusion less likely
Higher future demand, or demand growth - collusion more likely
Symmetry among firms is a factor facilitating collusion
What is the critical discount point for collusion?
DISCOUNT POINT = (PI (D) - PI (C)) / (V(C) - V(D))
What is the implications of critical discount threshold?
When firms care more about the future, they are more likely to stick to the cartel!
Price Parallelism - Collusion
Price Parallelism is not necessarily evidence of collusion, so competition authorities should only act on hard evidence
What does competition authorities do re. collusion?
prohibit unilateral communication of prices to be charged, unless to consumers
Prohibit exchange of info about prices/quantities among competitors
Prohibit firms’ attempts to introduce mechanisms which favour information exchanges
Product Differentiation - Collusion
When firms have different production costs that rise with quality, it is the price-cost margin that matters (affecting IC), so it can be higher or lower firms that chisel the cartel:
For small differences in unit production costs, low quality firms have more to gain from deviating (Bos and Marini 2019)
For high differences in unit production costs, high quality firms have more to gain from deviating (Häckner 1994)
Information Asymmetry and Collusion
Besanko and Spulber (1989) - pertinent point is that competition authorities cannot see firms’ cost functions
Besanko and Spulber (1989) - Characteristics
identical firms and marginal cost pricing
marginal cost is only known to firms.
2 types of firms (low and high cost which are random).
Competition authorities incur audit cost C and charge fine F if collusion is identified
Output is observable
Besanko and Spulber (1989) Proposition 1
It is never the case that low-cost firms behave competitively while high-cost firms collude - therefore, with asymmetric information, competition authority has to tolerate some low-cost collusion to economise on enforcement costs
Besanko and Spulber (1989) Proposition 2
Competition investigations must be launched when prices are higher - not necessarily because of collusion but to deter low-cost firms pretending to be high-cost for their own gain
Besanko and Spulber (1989) - Limiting Assumption
Assume that collusion is perfect and a competition authority cannot affect it’s sustainability, what about leniency/whistleblowing
Leniency Programmes
US since 1978, EU since 1996
Leniency Paper to Drop in
Aubert, Kovacic and Rey (2006) - competition between firms is not usually one-shot and colluding firms know they will be competing again in the future and are therefore reluctant to snitch in order to participate in collusion in the future
2 issues with leniency
1) Can cartels sustain themselves with leniency?
Chen and Rey (2013) - “collude and report”, adverse on welfare
2) How do cartels adjust their prices in response to leniency?
Hoube et al. (2015) - ex-post leniency, decrease in maximal collusive price!