Burglary and Aggravated Burglary – Theft Act 1968

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/10

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

These flashcards cover key legal concepts and case law from the lecture on burglary and aggravated burglary under the Theft Act 1968.

Last updated 11:01 AM on 4/24/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

11 Terms

1
New cards

Burglary

Defined under the Theft Act 1968, involving illegal entry with intent to commit theft, GBH, or criminal damage.

2
New cards

Effective Entry

Entry that must be effective, not necessarily complete or substantial, as per case law.

3
New cards

R v Collins (1973)

Case establishing that effective entry is required for burglary; later relaxed meaning of effective.

4
New cards

Building

Includes fixed structures, inhabited vehicles, and vessels as per s.9(4) of the Theft Act 1968.

5
New cards

Trespass

Occurs when an individual enters without consent or legal authority.

6
New cards

Mens Rea

Intent required for burglary, varies between different subsections of the Theft Act.

7
New cards

Aggravated Burglary

Committing burglary with a weapon, firearm, or explosive in possession.

8
New cards

Weapon of Offence

Defined under s.10(1) as made or adapted for causing injury.

9
New cards

R v O’Leary (1986)

Case ruling that a weapon must be possessed at the time of entry for aggravated burglary.

10
New cards

Conditional Intent

Sufficient intent to commit theft even if something is not planned to be stolen.

11
New cards

R v Husseyn (1977)

Case where loitering with intent was determined not to be clear intent at the time of entry.