Sociology as a science - realism and positivism

0.0(0)
Studied by 1 person
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/24

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

25 Terms

1
New cards

Key difference between science and sociology

  • Type of system

    • Sociology = open

    • Science = closed


2
New cards

3 reasons science is a closed system

  1. Has observable structures that → effects that can be observed

  2. Control over variables is high

  3. Predictions are precise, e.g. lab experiments


3
New cards

2 reasons sociology is an open system

  1. Variables are too complex and large-scale to measure and control

  2. Predictions are not precise


4
New cards

Disagreement with positivism

  • Doesn’t agree that science is only concerned with observable phenomena

    • E.g. black holes are unobservable yet can be observed by physicists


5
New cards

Is sociology a science?

  • Yes


6
New cards

Why sociology is a science

  • We observe unobservable phenomena like scientists and therefore can do this scientifically by observing their effects

    • Black holes = social class

      • E.g. we cannot observe social class/black holes but we can observe its effects on people/space


7
New cards

Way in which realists see Marxism as scientific

  • Observes effects (e.g. poverty) of underlying systems (e.g. capitalism)


8
New cards

Way in which realists see interpretivism as scientific

  • Interprets behaviour (effect) in terms of actors’ internal meanings (unobservable phenomenon)


9
New cards

2 realists

  1. Keat

  2. Urry


10
New cards

Sociology’s subject matter

  • Social facts


11
New cards

Verificiationism

  • Think of a theory that explains all observations

    • Use more observations to prove theory

      • Can then claim theory as a law


12
New cards

Process of inductive reasoning

  • Discovering laws that determine how society works

  • Accumulation of data about world → more knowledge → more patterns → predict events to guide policies


13
New cards

Explanation of patterns

  • All patterns can be explained by finding facts that cause them

    • Material deprivation (fact) → educational failure (pattern)


14
New cards

Scientific implications of social facts

  • Show that sociology is a unique subject matter that can be explained scientifically


15
New cards

Durkheim

  • Real laws are discoverable, e.g.:

    • Social facts of level of integration and regulation (real law) → suicide rate


16
New cards

Relationship between social facts and people

  • Social facts manipulate people like puppets on strings


17
New cards

Positivist view on science

  • Like its explanation of the natural world

  • Also like that it extends human control over nature


18
New cards

Should we use scientific methods to study sociology?

  • YES


19
New cards

Why should we use scientific methods to study sociology?

  • Nature and society are both objective, factual realities which are patterned

    • We then need to explain these patterns


20
New cards

Use of quantitative data

  • To study cause-and-effect laws and test hypotheses in a systematic and controlled way


21
New cards

Researchers

  • Detached and objective because could contaminate research

    • Because in science, scientists values/opinions make no difference to the outcome of research


22
New cards

Goal of knowledge

  • Game true objective knowledge to solve problems and progress


23
New cards

Is sociology a science?

  • YES

  • Objectively study social facts

    • Predict behaviour

    • Guide policy

    • Discover laws


24
New cards

Type of data

  • Reliable, aka checked by others


25
New cards

2 CRITICISMS of positivism — interpretivism

  1. Inadequate

  2. Unsuited to study humans