etv economic globalisation has greater impact than other types of globalisation

para

impact on n-s influence and state sov

impact on global peace and security

impact on hr

impact on ns influence and state sov

yes: econ glob increases econ interdependence among nations thru trade, investment and financial flows- can enhance the influence of economically pwrful states in globpol. china nd india gain more influence as they integrate into glob econ. can druve econ growth eg china belt and road initative. REAL argue tho can lead to erosion of econ sov bc it limits states ability to control its own econ policies bc decisions influenced by global markets. little room for tax increases fearing capital flight eg uk commitment to no corp tax increase. LIB more stable + prosperous. trump econ nationalism shows econ glob can be challenged cultural glob harder unless n-s adopt censorship eg n.korea

no: homogenisation of culture: oft leads to spread of similar cultural practices and values primarily driven by western media,consumer culture-diminish unique cultural identity and reducing influence in glob pol? n-s w strong cultural exports eg us can enhance glob influence thru soft pwr. REAL erode national identitites and weakens states ability to maintain cultural cohesion. LIB: cult glob as positive force that promotes glob understanding, cooperation and democratic values

glob peace and security

yes: dell theory, kantian triangle, rules based approach to global trade WTO ect. eg military conflict btw usa and china mutually damaging to economies thus unlikley. reffered to as “chimerica” by niall feguson. can also lead to econ inequality and exploitation -fuel social unrest act as catalyst for mass migration and conflict likely one of driving forces for russias invasion of ukraine. cult glob can create greater risks cultural clashes and resistance. econ can foster econ interdependence and deter conflicts eg support for brexit increased after global financial crisis- tension over immigration increase in instability.

no: LIB cult forster greater understanding and tolerance among diff cultures can reduce conflict and promote peace. REAL: cult glob can undermine state sov and lead to cultural clashes and resistance esp when global cultural norms r percieved as threatening local traditions and identities, can esacerbate tensions. rise of right populist direct result of cultural shifts thru migration esp in europe and north america. writers eg douglas murray “war on west” try to waarn of dangers of ilsamism and islamic inspired anti west movements. clash of civilisations

impact on hr

no: can promote hr by spreading awareness and fostering global advocacy. int media highlight hr abuses, mobilising global support for vs. LIB cult glob force for good. promote universal hr and env sstandards thru glob coop and shared values. global sporting events leading campaigns for better rights for women- womens world cup, olympics ect. can lead to cultural homogenization undermining local identity

yes: can improve hr by fostering econ growth and development- lead to better living standards and access to resources. can also lead to exploitation and inequality as multinational corps may prioritise profit over workers rights race to bottom. rana plaza.