Philosophy of Emotion: James-Lange Theory, Rationality, and Natural Kinds

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/14

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

This set of flashcards covers vocabulary and conceptual frameworks regarding the James-Lange theory of emotion, rational assessability, the comparative analysis of anger and envy, and the debate over emotions as natural kinds.

Last updated 8:41 PM on 6/10/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

15 Terms

1
New cards

James-Lange Theory

Directly identifying emotions as the felt perception of bodily changes triggered by an exciting stimulus, such as feeling sorry because we cry or afraid because we tremble.

2
New cards

Disembodied Emotion

What James describes as a nonentity or a cold and neutral state of intellectual perception that remains if bodily states are removed from the emotional experience.

3
New cards

Upstream Rationality

A distinction made by Teroni referring to whether the cognitive base or initial perceptual stimuli provide good reasons for the emotion.

4
New cards

Downstream Rationality

A distinction by Teroni referring to whether the effects of an emotion, such as subsequent judgments and behavior, make rational sense.

5
New cards

Blob-emotions

Teroni's term for natural responses to restricted stimuli that are impervious to additional evidence, functioning as pre-rational responses outside the rational/irrational frame upstream.

6
New cards

Recalcitrant Emotions

Emotions that persist despite contrary judgments, such as fearing a safe rollercoaster, which serves as a feature of the James-Lange theory where bodily responses and cognitive judgments diverge.

7
New cards

Misfit Principle

Grzankowski's principle stating that if one has an emotion while judging its formal object as absent, they are guaranteed to violate either a truth norm (judgment is false) or a fittingness norm (emotion is unfitting).

8
New cards

Fittingness

The normative standard for assessing whether an emotion correctly tracks its formal object, such as whether an object is actually dangerous in the case of fear.

9
New cards

Appraisal Theory

A framework where emotions are responses to how a situation is evaluated relative to a subject's goals, concerns, and well-being.

10
New cards

Formal Object

The specific property or evaluative rule defining what an emotion tracks, such as dangerousness for fear, offensiveness for anger, and a superior advantage in a self-relevant domain for envy.

11
New cards

Envy

A social emotion characterized by Smith & Kim as a painful feeling of inferiority, hostility, and resentment resulting from a comparative or relational status differential.

12
New cards

Schadenfreude

Taking pleasure in the misfortune of others, which is an state empirically linked to prior feelings of envy according to Smith et al. (1996).

13
New cards

Natural Kind

A category that exists independent of human conceptual activity, requiring a 1-to-11\text{-to-}1 neural or biological substrate that remains consistent across cultures.

14
New cards

Emotional Anaesthesia

A clinical condition where a patient reports functioning intellectually but lacking the faculty of feeling, used by James to support the idea that bodily resonance is necessary for emotion.

15
New cards

Feedback Loop Principle

The James-Lange concept that voluntarily performing the bodily manifestations of an emotion, such as posture or expressions, produces or intensifies the actual felt emotional state.