1/29
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
four leading to the Victim's’ Rights Movement
development of victimology, rise of crime in the 1960s and 1970s, rise of feminist movements (second wave feminism), and the growth of victim activism
federal legislation that established rights for victims in Federal courts
the Crime Victims’ Rights Act
The Crime Victims’ Rights Act
right to be reasonably protected from the accused, right t be reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of any public court proceeding or any parole proceeding involving crime or of any release or escape of the accused, right to not be excluded from any such public court proceeding unless the court after receiving clear and convincing evidence, determines that testimony by the victim would be materially altered if the victim heard other testimony at that proceeding, the right to be reasonably heard at any public proceeding in the district court involving release, plea, sentencing, or any parole proceeding, the reasonable right to confer with the attorney for the government, to full and timely restitution as provided in law, proceedings free from unreasonable delay, treated with fairness and with respect for the victim’s dignity and privacy, to be informed in a timely manner of any plea bargain or deferred prosecution agreement
criticisms of victim involvement in deciding punishment
inconsistency, burdens the CJ system, and undermine utilitarian goals of punishment
how for victim involvement undermine utilitarian goals
crime reducing effects of punishment, not catering deterrence and rehabilitation
payne v. Tennessee
Supreme Court ruled that victim impact statements are constitutional in death penalty cases
provisions of Marsy’s Law
notification and participation rights, protection from offender, input on bail, sentencing and parole, and legal standing and enforcement
main goal of cost-effectiveness evaluation
identify perspective important because determines which costs and benefits count, calculate “cost-per-outcome”
when to use cost-effectiveness evaluation
trying to evaluate multiple different strategies for one outcome
two main pieces of information needed for cost-effectiveness evaluation
the cost of implementing it at some known scale and effect size from prior evaluations at that same scale
outcome metric of cost-effectiveness evaluation
cost per unit of outcome
6 steps of cost-benefit evaluation
state the policy question, identify the perspective of analysis, identify all relevant costs and benefits, assign values to costs and benefits, compare the costs and benefits of one or more policies, and assess sensitivity of the results of critical assumptions and detail all relevant assumptions and limitations
marginal costs of cost-benefit
costs added by producing on additional unit
indirect costs
costs and benefits that are the policy’s spillovers, by-products, or externalities
tangible costs
have clear market value
intangible costs
feelings or things that aren’t easy to monetize
willingness-to-pay approach
asking people how much they would pay to reduce the chances of experiencing something
discount rates
the rate you use to convert future costs and benefits into today’s dollars, because money today is worth more than money later
information incorporated into a QALY
considers how long someone lives and their health state during those years
expansion of collateral consequences
1980s-1990s
PRQORA
allowed or required denial of certain public benefits, including TANF and SNAP, for people convicted of certain drug felonies
Megan’s Law
amended the Jacob Waterline Act to require public disclosure and notification, required sex offender registries to be public
percentage of US adults with criminal record
1 in 3 adults have a criminal record, 7-15% has a felony conviction
government benefit reforms
10% of people who re eligible for relief actually receive it, many states have removed or modified some collateral consequences from felony drug convictions, full ban on SNAP is left only in South Carolina and 7 states have restrictions on TANF
problem with ban-the-box
reduced employment prospects young black men without criminal record because of stereotypes