1/44
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
in NNT what do you do
round up
In NNH what do you do
round down
what do clinical end points reflect
survival or symptomactic status of patient
whats per protocol analysis
include only those events that occur while participant is complying with intervention
whats intention to treat
all included regardless of adherance
whats a non-inferiority design
to evaluate where trt is ‘not inferior’ to standard trt
what are systematic reviews
summarise studies
using structured, reproducible method
asses bias, confounding, study design issues
whats a meta analysis
statistical method for combinding the results of a number of studies
whats a fixed meta analysis
treatment affect the same in all studies - variation due to sampleing
whats a random effect metanalysis
heterogenicity
big studies don’t dominate as much
how to test for heterogeneity
cochran’s Q test
what is satisfaction called in economics
utility
what is health economics
the study of attempts to allocate limited healthcare resources among unlimited wants and needs to achieve the maximum health benefit for society
what are the two perspectives
healthcare system - only costs and benefity relivetnat to the healthcare system
society - costs and benefits to the whole of society
what are unidimensional benefits
don’t consider quality of life
can’t compare cost effectivness of interventions measured in units
what is QALY
generic measure of disease burden including the quanity (years) and quality of life (0-1)
one QALY = one year in perfect health
cost-minimisation analysis - just compares cost
cost consequence analysis - costs and benefits not compared mathematically in terms of numerical values
cost effectiveness plane
whats cost effectiveness analysis
costs and benefitys of two intervnetions
calculte the cost of each extra ‘unit of benefit’
calculated using ICER
whats cost utility analysis
subtype of cost effectivness analysis where benefits measured in QALYs
ICER = how many £ for each extra QALY
NICE cost effectivness threshold
25,000 - 30,000 per QALY
what are the two ways to carry out economic evaluation
trial based - collect costs alongside RCTs
economic modelling - decision tree, markov model
problems with trial based economic evaluation
follow up rarely long enough
can only compare treatments used in trial
costs vary between counties
does not use all the availbale info
whats the severity modifier
high everity - 1.7 times weighting for benefits
medium severity - 1.2 times weighting for benefity
no severity weight - 1 times
for highly specialised technology appraisals what are thresholds
<10 QALYS - 100,000 per QALY
11-29 QALYS - 100,000-300,000 per QALY
>30 QALYs gained - 300,000 per QALY
What are managed access programmes
allow people to use drugs whilst uncertainties about clinical or cost effectivness of the new treaments whilst collecting data
how long are managed access programmes and what two funding sources are there
5 years
cancer drugs fung
innovative medicines fund
what does non-differential misclassification do
underestimate effect for two exposure categories
whats a confounder
the distorition of risk estimate due to the mixture of the people in the study and population- a risl factor for the disease and is correlated with the exposure independent of disease
how to control confounding
randomisation
restriction
matching - pair cases with control
stratified analysis - separate out factors
multi variant analysis
strengths of cohort studies
efficent for rare exposures
multiple effects can be studies
less prone to bias
can calculate IR,RR
limitations of cohort studies
can have difficulties with loss to FUP
may have problems with bias
in case-control studies where should the controls come from
must be at risk of outcome but not have the outcome under study
what is bias
the introduction of a systematic error in the study
advvantages of case- control studies
results avialble quickly, cheaply
good for rare diseases with long latency
disadvantages of case control studies
inefficent for rare exposures
cant’ calculate indcidence or prevelance #
more prone to bias than cohort
what controls to use in case-control studies
hosptial controls - easy to recruit, might not come from same population
community controls - more representatvie, harder to recruit
two methods for drug safety evaluation
spontaneous reporting eg yellow card scheme
systematic evaluation
what are case reports
used in literature to report unsual medical occurances - cannot test for statistical association
3 types of adverse reaction
Type A - drug effect
Type B - patient reaction
Type C - where drug increases the frequency of spontaneous disease Type D - delayed reactions
what does proportional reporting ration do
compares how often a specific side effect is reported for ONE drug vs all drugs - shows assiciation
what 5 ways is drug safety studied in pregnant women
case-control studies
teratology information services
pregancy exposure registeries
electronic health data
clinical practice reasearch data link
issues with case-control studies in pregnancy
relies on maternal reoprting
doesn’t capture spontaneous losses
issues with pregnancy expoure registeries
self enrolment
loss to FUP
small numbers
strengths of electronic healthcare data
often provide representative sample
routinley recoreded
exposure data recorded prospectivly
internal comparators
limitations of electronic healthcare data
no OTC medicines or in patient prescirbing
dont know if medicine was taken