Global governance and IGOs

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/27

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 11:45 AM on 2/19/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

28 Terms

1
New cards

2 different theories of likelihood of global governance

  1. Social contract theory

  2. Neo-liberal theory

2
New cards

Social contract theory

  • Locke

    • Limited state created in a state of nature to prevent injutice

    • Therefore this should be applied to global politics

      • Rules-based international system would safeguard states from the problems of the anarchic international system

3
New cards

Neo-liberal theory

  • Complex interdependence (lack of hierarchy, decline in military force) → international organisations important

  • IGOs/NGOs set agenda, provide a forum and build coalitions

  • States make absolute gains in a globally governed system and cooperation is in their interest

4
New cards

The ‘international community’

  • 1999 Blair speech post-Kosovo NATO intervention

  • Defence of shared values and interests

5
New cards

Separation of national and international interest

  • Difficult

  • Should act in the international interest when there’s an external threat

6
New cards

Protection of HR by the international community

  • Should be done

  • HR applies to all humans everywhere

  • HR going unchecked → weakening of entire global system of HR

7
New cards

Necessity of states intervening in other state’s business

  • To respond to crises that require international community’s response

8
New cards

International law?

  • As long as clear and universally agreed = important basis for global politics

9
New cards

2 roles of international law

  1. Hold states accountable

  2. Ensure universal basic standards

  • UDHR sets out basic principles of HR to be respected by all states

10
New cards

Reasons for 2005 R2P

  • 1994 - 🇷🇼 genocide ineffectively prevented by 🇺🇳 peacekeepers

11
New cards

2005 R2P quote

“States have a serious responsibility to protect populations if they are suffering/likely to suffer serious harm”

12
New cards

R2P justification

  • Core principles of liberalism — only after discussion will military action be justified

13
New cards

4 considerations before R2P is enacted

  1. Purpose

  2. Timing

  3. Legality

  4. Substance

14
New cards

Purpose of R2P

  • Protection of civilians

15
New cards

Timing of R2P

  • Only post-diplomacy/negotiation

16
New cards

Legality of R2P

  • Only if authorised by UNSC resolution

    • P5 veto powers mean this could be set up as it wouldn’t be without it

17
New cards

Substance of R2P

  • Must be proportionate

  • Must be likely to suceed

  • Must not make the situation worse

18
New cards

3 difficulties of R2P being enacted in 🇨🇳 (Uighur Muslims)

  1. 🇨🇳 will not admit to commiting a genocide and therefore won’t negotiate — criteria 2 cannot be fulfilled

  2. Cannot be proven due to censorship, and even if it can be, 🇨🇳 has a UNSC veto — criteria 3 cannot be fulfilled

19
New cards

Role of non-state actors in GG

  • Make states aware of viewpoints/new policy choices

    • Add to richness of debate

  • Peacefully resolve or de-escalate inter-state disputes

20
New cards

5 important aspects of IGOs

  1. Universal and comprehensive source of IL

  2. Have more power than a state acting alone

  3. Improve integration, e.g. via free trade

  4. Forum for negotation

  5. Represent a broad range of ideas

21
New cards

Impacts of IGOs: 🇺🇳 (3)

  1. MDGs and SDGs

  2. PK missions across the 🌍

  3. Acts via military action and sanctions

22
New cards

Impacts of IGOs: IMF(2)

  1. Resolves cross-state financial crises

  2. Had a more important role and impact on the global economy post-2008

23
New cards

Impact of IGOs: WB (2)

  1. Improving international development

  2. Implementing MDGs and SDGs

24
New cards

Impact of IGOs: NATO (2)

  1. Military operations in 🇦🇫

  2. Counter-piracy in Indian 🌊

25
New cards

Impact of IGOs: AU (2)

  1. Formation of African bloc to increase African influence on the world stage

  2. Peacekeeping in Africa

26
New cards

Impact of IGOs: ASEAN (3)

  1. Increasing SE. Asian influence

  2. Countering 🇨🇳

  3. Better trade and connection

27
New cards

2 realist criticisms

  1. IGOs are only useful if they support a state’s national interest

  2. IGOs have too much power; should not be able to compel states to do things (hence vetos)

28
New cards

🇺🇸 undermining 🇺🇳 (4 ways)

  1. Denial of visas to delegates from countries they don’t like

  2. Huge funding cuts to humanitarian agencies - US AID

  3. Vetos any proposals re. SDGs, 🇮🇱

  4. Efficacy of 🇺🇳 = dependent on how interested 🇺🇸 is in the international community