1/13
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
speech
2-3 words per second, knowledge of 30000 words
language production
fulfil the communicative intention by realising details of syntax phonology and articulation
lexicalisation
producing/retrieving single words
history
freud- errors reflect unconscious desires/ psychopathology
franklin- errors reflect underlying cognitive processes
errors
speech produced doesnt match the intent
substitutions- wrong word
exchanges- confused order
preservations- taken tare of
anticipations- later sound produced early
substitutions
higher similarity in meaning and higher phoneme similarity inc error
2 stage model
message/meaning in mind to be expressed, lexical form retrieved
limitations of errors as a data source
observed inc nervousness
confirmation bias of observers
tip of tongue states self report
tip of tongue state Vigliocco et al 1999
prove that words are retrieved based on separate meaning and form as concept and properties accessed but not phonological form
more prevalent in older and bilinguals
more common for less common words
naming latencies Alario et al 2004
harder to see object= slower to name, agreement rate of others, word frequency/acquisition, number of phonemes no effect
Schriefers et al 1990
when semantically related word shown before word= harder as competition
when phonologically related word shown with/after word= easier as sound is primed
=semantics early phonology late
cascading information flow evidence
mixed errors- semantic and phonological active
blend errors- only one word should be selected at meaning and passed onto form in feedforward
feedforward models
perceptual loop of self-monitoring may seem like cascading