1/13
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Human parsing mechanism
understanding the structure of the sentence by breaking it down into its components
Garden path sentences
a grammatically correct sentence that leads readers to an incorrect interpretation (a "dead end") based on its initial phrasing, forcing a re-evaluation to understand the true meaning
Garden path model
takes place in 2 stages
1st stage: only syntax no semantics
processor draws on syntactic information only
intitally driven by principles of minimal attachment and late closure
2nd stage: if the initial parse is incompatible with semantic info then the parse is revised
Constraint-based model
different constraints mutually interact (syntax, semantic context, prosody, verb bias, frequency information)
these constraints operate at every step
eventually parsing reflects the structure most strongly supported by different sources of information
Garden path principle Late Closure
whenever possible, we prefer to attach new items to the current consitituent
Garden Path principle Minimal Attachment
new words are attached to the structure using the fewest nodes possible
relates to tree diagram
Lexical ambiguity
the word has more than one meaning (fell, idle, etc)
What happens when late closure and minimal attachment conflict
minimal attachment goes before late closure
Self paced reading study taraban and McClelland
evidence for interactivity
violates the principle of minimal attachment
semantic bias was found, meaning semantic information must play a role in how sentences are parsed
pros and cons of constraint based model
pros
accounts for the role of factors other than syntax
evidence we can consider more than one syntatic analysis at a time
my account for inidividual differences
Cons
difficult to falsify bc it doesnt make precise predictions
bilingual syntactic parsing
parsing is shaped by experience with each language
they show different parsing than native speakers
the attachment to preferences is not universal (english prefers late closure and spanish prefers earlier attachment)
Bilingual language experiences
their L1 effects how they view their L2 (or your more dominant language)
Language co-activation
semantic relationships can mediate cross-language activation in bilinguals even without shared speech phonology
arguments for both models benefit
garden path: effects that supposedly support constraint-based models arise because 2nd stage of parsing begins quickly
Constraint: techniques used by garden path researchers are not sensitive enoguh to detect the role of semantics