L5 Language Development

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/27

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Development Psychology

Last updated 1:16 PM on 5/14/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

28 Terms

1
New cards

DeCasper & Fifer, 1980

sucking behaviour indicates newborns recognise their mother’s voice compared with a stranger’s 


2
New cards

DeCasper & Spence, 1986

infants recognise a passage heard in utero compared to a new passage


3
New cards

Kisilevsky et al, 2003

measures of fetal heart rate at full term show increase to mother read vs stranger read poem


→ Evidence for very early sensitivity to speech and capacity for learning

May be based on speaker identity/intonation rather than speech processing/comprehension


4
New cards

Perception of Phonemes


At/soon after birth…

  • Infants discriminate similar-sounding phonemes (b vs p)

  • At 1-4 months, there is evidence for categorical perception – better on either side of a boundary used by adults (Eimas et al, 1971)

  • More attention to differences in phoneme than differences in voice of speaker (Kuhl, 1979)

Perceptual narrowing occurs later in the first year of life…

Werker & Tees, 1984 – Ability to discriminate phonemes in another language fades between 8-10 months 

→ Early capabilities + learning indicate “experience-expectant” system – one with an organisation that supports the learning of phonetic categories in any language 


5
New cards

Speech Segmentation 


Difficult task – sounds run into each other, sometimes words do not have pauses between them 

Infants pick up on statistical patterns in language as a cue to segmentation


6
New cards

Transitional probabilities

in continuous speech, some sound combinations are more frequent than others 


Frequent combination → likely to be within a word

Infrequent combination → likely to be between words 


7
New cards

Saffran et al, 1996

 infants rapidly learn such probabilities even in artificial languages

8
New cards

Werker & Gervain, 2013

number of other cues correlated with word boundaries (stress patterns) also learnt and employed at 7-9 months 

These mechanisms for statistical learning indicate infants come equipped to learn meaningful patterns and distinctions in the language they are exposed to 

Later, recognition of some individual words → help determine where other words exist in stream


9
New cards

Speech Production - Kuhl, 2004


Infants produce non-speech sounds (1-3 months)

Infants produce vowel-like sounds (3 months)

“Canonical babbling” (7 months)

Language-specific speech production (10 months)

First words produced (12 months)


10
New cards

Semantics

Dramatic vocabulary development from 18 months → 6 years

Comprehension of 50-100 words at 18 months

→ 900 words at 2 years

→ 8000 words at 6 years


11
New cards

Smith, 2000

Associative/Perceptual Account

Associative learning plus perceptual similarity ← picking up on statistics in the environment


12
New cards

Tomasello, 1988; Bloom, 2001

Social Account

Children need social cues such as pointing and eye gaze to learn words 


13
New cards

Hollich et al, 2000 – Emergentist Coalition Model (ECM)

A hybrid approach

  • Children learn words using perceptual, social, and linguistic cues

  • Their reliance on cues changes over time

Mostly associative in 1st year of life (Pruden et al, 2006)

Increasingly reliant on social and linguistic information (Golinkoff & Hirsh-Pasek, 2006

  • Incorporates and builds on previously documented constraints and biases 

14
New cards

Assumption of mutual exclusivity

children expect that different words mean different things (Markman & Wachtel, 1988

  • 3-4 year olds assign newly introduced nonsense syllable to a novel object they don’t yet have a word for rather than a familiar one with an associated meaning 

  • New labels provided for known objects are often attributed to a part of the object or substance it is made out of rather than an alternative name for the object 

15
New cards

Gleitman, 1990 – Syntactic Bootstrapping

Using grammar to infer word meaning

Children use a grammatical distinction to help assign meanings to the words they hear (“gorping” as opposed to “gorping with”)


16
New cards

Roy et al, 2009

 longitudinal study of a single child and his linguistic environment

Acquisition of individual words correlates with how caregivers “tune” their speech to make learning a new word easier 

17
New cards

Syntax development


Without grammar → telegraphic speech, very basic communication 

Earliest word combinations (~18 months)

With grammar → express more complex relations


18
New cards

Brown & Hanlon, 1970

 parents often correct factual mistakes, but not grammatical errors → syntax is NOT learnt through explicit corrections from parents


19
New cards

Skinner’s Operant Conditioning Model, 1957 


Language can be learned through imitation, trial and error, and reinforcement

A child acquires verbal behaviour when people react in certain ways to certain combinations of sounds/words they make


20
New cards

Chomsky’s Innate Language Acquisition Device, 1959-1965

behaviourism studies argued that internal representations are needed to produce language 

Speakers hear and use the surface structure but are comprehending the deep structure 

Rules relating to deep structure → too complex to be learned by association

→ Innate capacity for grammar – some kind of expectations/constraints for what kinds of grammars are possible in human language 

Grammatical rules are more efficient and can be applied to new words – expectations have to be remembered individually 


21
New cards

Slobin, 1985

 children’s grammatical rule learning

  • First remember specific examples

  • Learn to apply general rule

  • Over-regularise the rule

  • Individually correct over-regularised assumptions through trial and error 

22
New cards

Fiser & Aslin, 2002

evidence for the overlap of language learning mechanisms and other learning mechanisms

infants also learn co-occurrence statistics of visual stimuli – broader learning rules may underline some aspects of language acquisition


23
New cards

Rumelhart & McClelland, 1985

a general-purpose model of statistical learning could explain errors that seem specific to language (ie, over-regularisation of the past tense)


24
New cards

Dehaene-Lambertz et al, 2002

speech processing specifically localizes in the temporal lobe at 3 months

However,

  • Different cortical regions can support next to normal language acquisition in cases of early brain damage 

  • Congenitally deaf patients show different functions in areas normally supporting oral language

25
New cards

Miller et al, 1975

some auditory mechanisms involved in early speech perception are shared with other species (ie, chinchillas)


26
New cards

Brainard & Doupe, 2002

 like language, birdsong is learnt through experience, and like infants, birds have sensitive periods


27
New cards

Fisher & Scharff, 2009

 human language includes ancestral mechanisms shared with other species, and the nature of the overlap is still unclear 

28
New cards

Neuronal recycling hypothesis – Dehaene et al, 2010; Dehaene & Cohen, 2011 


Reading acquisition partially recycles a cortical territory evolved for object and face recognition 

Literate vs illiterate participants – when learning to read, representation of written words partially takes over the “visual word form area” (VFWA)