1/69
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Empiricism
preference for evidence over theory- emphasis on what is over what should be
Normative- denotes how arrangements should be in the future- disagrees with Conservatism
Hobbes key quotes and theories
Leviathan 1651- life in state of nature ‘nasty, brutish and short’, ‘war of every man against every man’
Wisdom of submission- Individuals surrender to a sovereign (Leviathan) to create an ordered society
Burke key quotes and theories
Reflections on the revolution in France 1790- stresses importance of gradual reform, change to conserve (with emphasis on empiricism, organicism, tradition)
revolution = rule by ‘swinish multitude’
Mankinds tendency to fail (imperfection) so Burke denounces idealistic society- ‘Beware the lust for new)
Criticised new French repub for centralized govt, praising a society of ‘little platoons’
Micheal Oakeshott key quotes and theories
‘On being Conservative’ 1962- ‘philosophy of imperfection need not be a philosophy of pessimism’- conservatives ‘prefer present laughter to utopian bliss’
Nautical metaphor- all sail sea in no direction, states role is to stop boat from sinking
‘Rationalism in politics’ 1962 emphasis on pragmatism
Nozicks criticism of Oakeshott’s theory
too fatalistic and underestimates our ability to shape circumstances
‘lazy’, allowed socialist ideas to develop post war
Rand key quotes and theories
Atlas shrugged 1957- talented individuals rather than ambitious governments lay at heart of any society no matter how much state extends itself
Virtue of Selfishness 1964- theory of Objectivism
belief we should be guided by self interest and rational self-fulfillment- link to New Rights revival of negative liberty and laissez faire capitalism
‘The small state is the strong state’- but order and security necessary as well as free markets so not anarchy (but defends right to choose e.g on homosexuality)
Links with atomism- society defined by autonomous individuals all seeking self fulfillment and self realisation
Nozick key quotes and theories
‘Anarchy, state and Utopia’ 1974
Growth of govt gravest threat to individual freedom
Growth of Western welfare states led to culture of dependency
Minimal (minarchist) state, with a permissive society (unlike some elements of neo-conservative)
‘Tax, for the most part, is theft’- state could play role in outsourcing public services to private companies- Distributive injustice
‘Tale of the slave’ govt control of demanding taxes likened to slavery
society predates state
similarity between Nozick and Burke
Nozick’s minarchism would allow multitude of self-sufficient communities to emerge and practice own moral counselling (e.g socialist values) alongside extension of individual freedoms- similar to Burke’s idea of ‘little platoons’
Noblesse oblige
soft paternalism (vs Hobbes hard paternalism) revived by Disraeli (Sybil/Two nations)
Conservatives and HN- moral, psychological, intellectual
moral- humankind selfish and greedy, crime stems from individual
psychological- limited and dependent creatures, fear isolation and seek security of knowing place- emphasis on importance of tradition and social order
intellectually limited- conservatives suspicious of abstract and radical systems (But undermined by New Right)
New right and economy
Nozick ‘tale of the slave’
Competition as means of driving up standards- Milton Friedman ‘power of choice’
govt job to control inflation not provide full employment
Thatcher- shrunk size of state through tax cuts and privatisation
Nozick and Rand (Friedman and Von Hayek) faith in free market- deregulated
trad cons- human nature and economy
fear of unstable nature of capitalist booms and busts and optimistic liberal view about free market= more pessimistic
reluctant support of capitalism and prepared to use protectionism/mercantilism
emphasis on private property
Onc and economy
Disraeli prepared to accept increased govt regulation of economy due to noblesse oblige e.g placing max hours on work, banning children under 9 from working 9 (warned of ‘two nations’)
20thc- prepared to embrace keynesian economics - Harold Macmillan describes as economic middle way between extremes of state managed socialism and extremes of free market capitalism
Charles murray
‘emerging British underclass’ 1987
criticizes benefit dependency, especially among single mothers
Burke on tradition
‘accumulated wisdom’ of past generations = stability and social cohesion, respect for institutions - family and monarchy
society is a partnership between ‘those who are living, those who are dead, and those who are to be born’
organic society- society is ‘a partnership in all art and science’
stress on organic hierarchy vs atomistic individualism of new right
New right strands
Neo-conservatives
concerned with society, cohesion and trad values, oppose permissiveness e.g Thatcher section 28, Trump
Neo-liberals
atomistic view of soc, free market, positive rational human nature, permissive society- concerned with economic and individual freedom
Rand rejects altruism engineered by state
To what extent is there more agreement than disagreement within conservatism?
Human nature
state and society
economy
To what extent are conservatives united in their view towards the state?
All - see place for state in society
Disagreement - Paternalistic, hierarchical state (organic state/noblesse oblige) vs Minarchist libertarian state
Trad/ONC - state is highest authority, performs paternalistic role
disagreement between extent of paternalism e.g between Hobbes and Disraeli
Disagreement - Pragmatic vs ideological governance of state
Burke- state should not attempt radical change- state should be based on empiricism
Oakeshott- ‘rationalism in politics’
VS- NR- prioritise abstract principles state should follow- laissez-faire, non-interventionism and self ownership
To what extent are Conservatives united in their view of society?
All accept degree of inequality in society - but disagree on source (Trad- based on hierarchy and tradition, NR- based on free market)
Disagreement - Organic society vs Atomistic individualism
Most- accept importance of tradition in society (apart from neo-liberals)
Egotistical individualism vs developmental individualism
Egotistical- belief individual freedom is associated with a rational sense of self-reliance and self interest- leads to classical belief in limited govt
Developmental- (classical and modern)- individual must help themselves to improve
Classical- state should interfere as little as possible in this (limited govt)
Modern- by intervening, state can assist in individuals development e.g education
Harm principle
state is justified in interfering with individual freedom when it is to prevent citizens doing harm to others
J.S Mill- On liberty 1859
Self-regarding actions should not be restricted by state even if immoral to oneself
Mechanistic theory of the state
State is not organic but created by individuals to serve them and act in their interests (modern/classical disagree over what best interests are)
John Locke- Social contract (Enlightenment) between rulers and ruled not divine right of kings creating a govt by consent, but rejects Hobbes authoritarian state
opposite of conservative view that society is an organism in which the state evolves over time
reflects liberal support for foundational and formal equality
Lockes state of nature
underpinned by ‘natural laws’, ‘natural liberties’ and ‘natural rights’
foundational equality- natural right to ‘life, liberty, property’- (two treatises of govt 1689)
Jefferson in American Declaration (1776) described inalienable rights as ‘life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness’
key principles of liberalism
freedom and liberty
individualism
liberal democracy
tolerance
limited government
rationalism
equality of rights
Locke quote on limited state
‘Government has no other end than the preservation of property’
but - views education as essential- everything we know is derived from experience as minds are a ‘tabula rasa’ (blank slate)
negative vs positive liberty
negative- freedom from state interference - classical
positive- freedom to achieve ones goals- modern (20th c idea freedom not merely absence from restraints but also potential)
This is rooted in the fact both view freedom as essential for facilitating personal autonomy (Mills- w/ personal autonomy individuals can achieve self-realisation)
Wollstonecraft
rejected view of authoritative writers at the time e.g Jean-Jacques Rousseau who wanted to deny women a formal education
womens rational nature gives ground for formal equality and education + equal rights to fully participate in democracy (liberal democracy)
‘vindication of the rights of woman’ 1792
Rawls on social justice
‘theory of justice’- state led redistribution to improve equality of opportunity (distributive justice)
liberty and equality of opportunity must exist in relatively equal economic system
‘Veil of ignorance’ theory- all would choose a just society with minimal inequality
difference principle- economic inequalities permissible if benefitting most disadvantaged e.g through incentives and productivity (genuine meritocracy e.g doctors should be paid more for incentive and benefit of society)
liberalism and democracy
Liberal = all citizens equal, democracy = majority earn right to form govt, and majority respect rights of minority
Toleration (as individuals are rational)- Voltaire ‘I detest what you say but will defend to the death your right to say it’, Locke- govt should protect ‘life, liberty, property’ but no right to meddle in ‘the care of mens souls’
Inherent distrust of overextending govt as all govts potential tyrannies against individual
Constitution is needed to enshrine natural rights e.g in Tom Paine’s Rights of man 1791
Classical vs Modern liberals on democracy
collectivist concept so may lead to tyranny, could threaten private property and individual freedom so govts need consent of people to rule (Locke’s social contract)
Modern- democracy is best way to limit govt- encourages participation, improving education- adding value to personal development
criticisms of natural rights
edmund Burke feared widespread belief in natural rights would lead to social instability
Jeremy Bentham - rights arise from actions of govts (e.g creation of laws) so not inalienable- describes natural rights as ‘nonsense on stilts’
Modern liberals e.g T.H Green argued individual rights must also be connected to common good
Liberalism in UDHR 1948
‘the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family’
To what extent do Liberals agree over human nature?
Individualism
Rationalism
Equality
J.S Mill and Kant on individualism
J.S Mill- ‘over himself, his own body and mind, the individual is sovereign’
Immanuel Kant- ‘individuals are an end to themselves not just a means’
Links to human nature as individualism emphasises rationalism
rationalism in the enlightenment and pre-enlightenment
pre-enlightenment- humans should rely on knowledge of those in power (Paternalism)
Enlightenment- reason is the ultimate source of authority and legitimacy (instead of religious, emotional, superstitious notions)
Betty Friedan
Feminine mystique - ‘the problem with no name’ deep dissatisfaction due to societys assumption female fulfillment based on marriage and children
genuine freedom for women- formal legal equality and state intervention e.g access to childcare and education
state should help remove structural barriers for women (positive liberty) which prevent women from achieving autonomy and economic independence
Conflict - liberals- state
J.S Mill ‘Nightwatchman state’ vs Rawls ‘Enabling state’ w/ distributive justice
Liberal govt reforms 1906-14 and modern liberalism
Asquith, Churchill, Lloyd-George
old age pensions, Labour exchanges set up, National Insurance Act 1911
Shift towards positive liberty- helping individuals achieve freedom than simple limited govt
enabling state as inequality removes ability of individuals to make rational decisions
Classical liberalism and the economy
Limited govt= laissez faire economy
Adam Smith- invisible hand of market
oppose mercantilism as limits individuals right to choose (Ricardo- comparative advantage)
trickle down economics
Modern liberalism and the economy
Free market economy
Egotistical individualism can lead to market failure so some state involvement needed -Keynesian economics
Distributive justice
welfare state e.g early 20thc liberal party reforms to create enabling state
Keynesian economics
assumption the govt should intervene within economy to mitigate effects of market failure
mixed economy w/ role for private and public sector
‘the man in whitehall knows best’- postwar consensus where civil servants entrusted w/ steering economy, managing full employment and controlling key industry
To what extent does liberalism have a fear of the state?
Freedom
Equality
Democracy
key principles of socialism
collectivism
workers control
social class
common humanity
equality
Marx & Engels- empiricism
argued theories were empirical and scientifically determined- explaining historical change through historical materialism: arguing economic factors driving force for change
economic base (Capitalism) forms and shapes superstructure (Culture, politics, law, ideology, social consciousness)
Dialectic- clash of ideas and perceptions between each stage of history
occurs when pre-existing set of ideas (ruling class) no longer valued by majority- new society formed from opposing tensions
Hegelian dialectic- development occurs through contradiction
Marx- class consciousness and phases of communism
Communist manifesto 1848
Dialectic struggle between proletariat (who will gain class consciousness) and bourgeoisie
argued liberal democracy was a ‘democratic swindle’ as state controlled by bourgeoisie- state uses religion, patriotism, enfranchisement, social reforms to weaken class consciousness
religion ‘opium of masses’
Dictatorship of proletariat will occur then state will wither away into classless soc based on common ownership
Human nature- revolutionary socialists
common brotherhood- humans are naturally sociable and fraternal - John Donne ‘no man is an island’
capitalism forces competition (selfishness) which is entirely unnatural, devastating and alienating impact of capitalism- working together makes moral and economic sense
e.g Rochdale pioneers- cooperative movement
interests of group should take priority over individual
economically- individual effort is wasteful/limited impact
Equality- revolutionary socialist
seek total equality by abolishing private ownership (Marx and Engels) leading to communism (equality of outcome- equal material rewards)
egalitarianism - desire to promote social equality, belief equality is the most fundamental political value
Marx- ‘from each according to his ability to each according to his needs’
Collectivism- Revolutionary socialism
support wholesale collective effort through policies e.g 5YPs or communal living- collectivism organised by state
Rosa Luxemburg- genuine equality requires revolutionary transformation not gradual reform
Social class- revolutionary socialists
Marxists emphasise class politics based on division of capital and labour- conflict between owners of wealth and proletariat is inevitable (dialectic)
Marx predicted this would lead to a proletarian revolution overthrowing capitalist state & bourgeoisie - with goal of classless equal society
Private property must be abolished to end class divisions
Marx - ‘The history of all hitherto existing societies is the history of class struggle’
Workers control- revolutionary socialists
Only way to rid workers of alienation and exploitation is to abolish capitalism all together
means of production collectivised - common ownership
workers responsible for collective decisions as state withers away (communism)
Marx four aspects of alienation (reasons for workers control)
alienation from the product of labour
alienation from the process of labour (work is unfulfilling)
alienation from species essence- humanity (capitalism creates selfish competition which is unnatural)
alienation from other individuals (social- seeing fellow workers as rivals)
20thc socialists and workers control
Syndicalists were hostile to state- saw as capitalist and inefficient, instead wanted federation of workers bodies - e.g early 20thc french syndicalism
Guild socialists- state ownership of industry in pursuit of workers control- proposed by GDH Cole
industrial self management by workers living under state socialism reinforces idea socialism should enhance conditions of w-c e.g workers councils in Yugoslavia 1950/60s
fundamental beliefs shared by all strands of socialism
importance of social equality
belief in human cooperation
need to challenge or manage inequalities created by Capitalism
Rosa Luxemburg
1913- ‘accumulation of capital’
evolutionary capitalism flawed- capitalism cannot be reformed
Marx’s historical materialism is flawed- capitalism does not need to reach final stage before abolished- communist revs could happen in less economically developed socs
Lenin’s idea of a ‘Vanguard elite’ flawed- class consciousness will develop spontaneously through struggle for democracy and strike action (direct action and mass mobilisation)
internationalism is central (consistent w/ Marx and Engels)
social democracy- human nature
accept capitalism plays a role in providing material rewards to motivate individuals
Evolutionary socialists- moral incentive to seek financial gains in order to redistribute wealth
constrain and tame capitalism to reduce inequality + promote common humanity
Social democracy -equality
accept some inequality of outcome as inevitable as accept capitalism has role in motivating human productivity
Collectivism- social democracy
support mixture of collective effort, TUs, welfare (NHS) & individual effort
social class- Social democracy
focus on narrowing gaps between social classes (growing middle class & decline in trad working class industries)
social amelioration and class harmony over social polarisation and class war - consequence of declining class solidarity
social democrats define class in terms of income and status (e.g white vs blue collar)- vs revolutionary split between labour and capital
advocate economic/social intervention to narrow class divisions
Workers control/ capitalism - Social democracy
do not wish to completely abolish capitalism as oppose to revolutionaries
systems like TUs can create greater worker control ensuring decisions over wages and conditions
nationalisation of key public industries- should be run in public interest & profits reinvested
Beatrice Webb
inevitability of gradualness- evolutionary socialist belief parliamentary democracy and not revolution will deliver inevitable socialist society due to enfranchisement of wc who will vote for socialist parties
revolutions are ‘chaotic, infefficient and counter-productive’
expansion of state vital
‘Minority report of the poor law commission’ 1909- many ideas from this report used in 1942 Beveridge report (basis of welfare state in Britain- 5 giant evils in society)
Fabian society links w/Labour- Webbs played large part in Labour party constitution 1918 incl. original Clause IV (committment to public ownership)
Anthony Crosland
‘Future of Socialism’ 1956
modern capitalism could deliver equality and justice when managed by welfare and education reforms
Marx’s analysis dialectic of historical materialism not present in post-war Capitalism with growing middle class and higher living standards
Equality of opportunity can be achieved through state education - judged existing British system ‘the most divisive, unjust and wasteful of all the social aspects of inequality’
Mixed economy w/ Keynesian economics- state managed capitalism
early utopian socialism
Robert Owen - belief in importance of a positive environment for human development and happiness- New Lanark
Third way and human nature
more prepared to accept liberal individualism
share socialist view of common humanity- accept human beings need communities - committment to communitarianism
Third way & equality
reject equality of outcome but supports strong equality of opportunity
acknowledge social factors involved in creation of wealth
economic efficiency can be combined with social justice
reduced but strategic welfare state- aimed at education, training and childcare e.g Blair’s sure start
Third Way & collectivism
acceptance of liberal individualism
but accept limited collective effort
Blair abolished Clause IV in 1995 replacing with market friendly, moderate clause
Clause IV 1918
‘secure for the workers by hand or by brain the full fruits of their industry’ ‘upon the basis of the common ownership of the means of production, distribution and exchange’
social class- third way
decline in trad working class industries- forced traditional socialist parties to revise policies in order to appeal to middle classes (Mondeo man - 1999 declared ‘the class war is over’)
define radicalism less in terms of class emancipation and more in gender equality, peace, ecological sustainability
workers control- Third way
acceptance of capitalism
workers control could refer to individual business in cooperative movement
Anthony Giddens
‘Beyond left and right’ 1994, ‘The third way: the renewal of Social democracy’ 1998
socialism must harness the benefits of irreversible free market capitalism whilst neutralising negative effects on community/fraternity
prudent taxation of free market wealth can fund spending on infrastructure, community services and public transport
‘active welfare’ e.g access to higher education, academy schools
‘socialism is dead as an economic doctrine’
socialist critics see third way as a wholesale capitulation to global, free market capitalism
essay plan - To what extent does the 3rd way effectively abandon socialist principles?
equality/social justice
collectivism/workers control
social class/extent of capitalism