1/357
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
4 things law and litigation may arise out of
federal and state constitutions
statutes
administrative regulations
judicial interpretations and rulings
Fair Labor Standards Act
minimum salary and overtime provisions for public/private sector employees
Title VII Civil Rights Act of 1964
prohibits discrimination in hiring process, working conditions and the unlawful provision of benefits based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin (also extends to hostile work environments)
Equal Pay Act
prevents sex based discrimination in wages and benefits when men and women do similar work
Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978
prohibits unequal treatment of women b/c of pregnancy or related medical conditions (ex. nausea)
Age Discrimination in Employment Act
general prohibits unequal treatment of applicants or employees based on their age, if they are age 40 years or older, in regard to hiring, firing, receiving benefits, and other conditions of employment
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
goal of legislation to remove barriers that might prevent otherwise qualified individuals with disabilities from enjoying the same employment opportunities as persons without disabilities
Section 1983
legislation that is the investment by which an employee may sue an employer for civil rights violations based on the deprivation of Constitutional rights
2 remedies that may affect public sector employees
Tort actions
Contractual claims
5 thing hiring tests commonly used to determine…
intelligence, emotional suitability and stability, physical agility, character, and drug use
Hiring tests cannot be…
discriminatory or have unequal treatment of protected groups
Critical question for hiring tests
whether they validly test types of skills needed for the job
A companion concern for tests is whether…
they are used for discriminatory purposes or have an unequal impact on protected groups
A number of private companies provide…
valid, reliable examinations for use by the public sector (ex. physical agility, background check)
Disparate treatment
illegal treating of people differently b/c of age, gender, sex, or other protected status
The Federal Equal Opportunity law prohibits the use of…
selection procedures for hiring or promotion that have a discriminatory impact on employment opportunities of women, POC, or other protected classes
Bona fide occupational qualifier (BFOQ)
rationale for discriminating on the bases of a business necessity in certain situations (ex. color blind, deaf)
“Business justification”
explanation for hiring policies that may have a disparate impact
If a disparate practice does not tie into the BFOQ…
its illegal, cannot be discriminated
Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA)
held that age should not be a BFOQ b/c youthfulness is a not a guarantee of public safety
A physical fitness standard would better serve…
the purpose of ensuring the ability to perform the tasks of the position over the ADEA
Who did Congress exempt from application of ADEA?
federal employees
Supreme Court and ADEA ruling
another agency cannot adapt same standards without showing an agency specific need
Affirmative action
actions or policies that favor persons or groups who have experienced discrimination, particularly in employment or education
Quotas for affirmative action
have been at the center of legal, social, scientific, and political controversy for more than four decades
Affirmative action plans only give preferred treatment…
to affected groups when all other criteria are equal (can be used in a series of qualifications), cannot completely discount another group
Two step test of affirmative action
must act in a remedial way to correct past imbalances OR better mirror the community
Reverse discrimination
argument that preferential affirmative action policies have resulted in unfair treatment for members of majority groups
14th amendment and property rights
provides that “nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law…”
4 elements of due process claim under Section 1983:
Person acting under color of state law
Deprived an individual
Of constitutionally protected property
Without due process of law
Courts have considered the legal view that public employees…
may have a protected right to their job, instead of being fired at will like in the past
Property right in employment
positions that individuals have for which there must be some demonstrated cause for termination (as opposed to an individual in an “at will” position)
3 things employees entitled to before firing
pre termination hearing
post termination hearing
post termination notice and opportunity to respond
Probationary employees
have little or no property interest in employment
Two types of employees exempt from protections
policymaking and probationary
Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)
establishes minimum wages and requires overtime compensation in the private sector and to state/local government employees
The FLSA comes into play when…
overtime salaries must be paid, employees on stand by must be paid
Disparate treatment in pay and benefits litigated under…
Title VII or statutes like Equal Pay Act or Equal Protection Clause
Where are criminal justice employee benefits addressed? (3)
Title VII, the ADEA, and the Pregnancy Discrimination Act
Who is exempted from coverage of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA)?
federal, state, and local governments
Criminal justice work is often dangerous in sense that…
it involves use of force and often occurs in places outside governmental control
Liability for an employees…
injury, disability, or death is a critical concern for CJ agencies
Civil tort actions in these cases can have…
a devastating impact on governmental budgets
Many CJ executives have attempted to regulate…
what their employees say to the public
Executives develop and rely on…
policies and procedures designed to govern employee speech
Supreme Court on freedom of speech, held…
“the state has interests as an employer in regulating the speech of its employees that differ significantly from those it possesses in connection with regulation of the speech of the citizenry in general”
State limits on freedom of speech
may impose restrictions on employees that it cannot impose on the citizenry, but restrictions must be reasonable
2 situations where police rules may unreasonably restrict officers’ free speech…
when the action is overly broad
when limitations are unreasonable → governmental action is applied
Most protected type of speech is…
political speech
Political behavior of their employees may be…
restricted by governmental agencies, a right upheld by Supreme Court
Hatch Act
limits partisan political activities by government employees and forbids fundraising for candidates, canvasing votes, public endorsement or opposition of candidates
Hatch Act applies to all employees EXCEPT…
president and vice president
If an agency accepts federal funding…
Hatch Act is applied and authority figures may not accept campaign donations for subordinates if running for office
It is a violation of employees 1st amendment rights to discharge them from…
non-policymaking positions solely on basis of political party affiliation
The 1st amendment protects both political and…
non-political associations
Police departments commonly prohibit…
officers from associating with known felons
Police administrations and constitutional authority
may regulate employees’ off-duty associational activities, but regulations must not be overly broad (ex. adultery outside of work may be punished)
Can social media be regulated?
Yes b/c posts reach a lot of people and can reflect negatively on the organization (ex. racist George Floyd post resulted in termination)
4th amendment protects…
“the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures”
4th amendment application to officers
typically applies when at home or off duty in the same manner is applies to all citizens
Police officers can be compelled to…
cooperate with investigations of their behavior, such as appearing in a lineup or searches of department equipment and lockers
Garrity v. New Jersey
court held info coerced from an officer could not be used against them at their criminal trial b/c the 5th amendment forbids use of coerced confessions
Under Garrity, its proper to fire an officer who…
refuses to answer questions if informed that answers will not be used later in a criminal proceeding
Majority of lower courts have held that…
an officer can be required to submit a polygraph examination
If an officer is required to confess or answer questions in a policy evaluation…
their confession cannot be used against them in criminal proceedings b/c its a compelled statement
Criminal vs. administrative investigations
criminal take precedent b/c you can use evidence from criminal in administrative, but not vice versa
Garrity vs. NJ is…
IMPLIED b/c if boss asks you a question, you are expected to answer honestly
It is generally assumed that in taking a CJ position, you agree to…
work odd shifts and abide by various unpleasant conditions
Personnel with least seniority…
generally work the most undesirable shifts
The job and one’s religious beliefs may sometimes be…
in direct conflict, employee may be forced to choose between the two
An alternative to accepting agency demands on religion, some may…
litigate the work-religion conflict
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act prohibits…
religious discrimination in employment
Accommadations for religion
can sometimes be made but must be reasonable
Sexual impropriety in CJ work can range from…
casual flirting while on job to romantic involvement with foreign agent trying to learn delicate matters of national security
Two extremes of sexual incidents…
officers posing nude in magazines’
major departments being compelled by mayors to recruit officers for sexual orientation
Departments try to maintain high standards of…
officer conduct
Officers may litigate sexual cases if…
they believe their right to privacy was intruded upon
Residency requirements
many governmental agencies specifying that all or certain employees must live within city or county of employment
3 possible justifications for residency requirements
employees should become familiar with and be visible in jurisdiction
employees should live where they are paid by taxpayers to work
employees must live within certain proximity of work in order to respond quickly in event of emergency
Residency requirement exception arguments
areas where housing is unavailable or exceptionally expensive
Moonlighting
second job in addition to one's regular employment, agencies often place limitations on amount or kind of outside work employees can perform
Rationale against moonlighting…
if outside employment seriously interferes with keeping the (police and fire) departments fit and ready for action at all times
Police empowered to use…
lethal force when justified
Misuse of firearms may be prevented by…
agency policies regulating use by officers both on and off duty
Regulations on use of firearms must be…
reasonable
3 issues addressed by firearm regulations
requirements for safeguarding
guidelines for carrying off duty
limitations on when it may be fired
Courts and juries becoming harsher in dealing with…
officers who misuse their firearms
Reasoning for alcohol and drug limitations
employees must be able to perform their work with a clear, unaffected head
Police department and prison manuals often specify that…
no alcoholic beverages be consumed within a specified period prior to reporting for duty
3 most controversial drug testing issues
whether testing should be permitted with no indication of drug problem
whether testing methods are reliable
whether a positive test proves on-the-job impairment
2 important cases for drug testing
National Treasury Employees Union v. Von Raab
Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives’ Association
Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives’ Association (1989)
upheld mandatory drug and alcohol testing for railroad workers after accidents or violations, allowing suspicionless testing in safety-sensitive jobs to protect public safety.
National Treasury Employees Union v. Von Raab (1989)
upheld drug testing without suspicion for U.S. Customs employees in safety-sensitive roles (like carrying firearms) to protect public safety
Purpose of procedural safeguards for officers
to protect against what officers perceive as arbitrary infringement on their rights
Peace Officers Bill of Rights (POBR)
legislation mandating due process rights for officers who are subject of internal investigations that could lead to disciplinary action
3 common provisions of POBR state legislation
written notice, right to representation, polygraph examination
Written notice
officer must be given written notice of the nature of the investigation, summary of alleged misconduct, and name of investigating officer
Right to representation
officer may have an attorney or representative of their choosing present during any phase of questioning or hearing
Polygraph examination
officer may refuse to take a polygraph examination and is found to be telling the truth
Employee Polygraph Protection Test
employees cannot be required to take a polygraph test as part of employment → federal state and government employees exception