1/29
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
dangerous sport
risk central human functional capabilities
e-sports and danger
high risk of low-yield injuries
normal human life (4)
live to end of normal length life
good health
move freely from place to place
use senses to imagine, think, and reason in a human way
CTE
degenerative brain disease caused by repeated head impacts
reason to play dangerous sport 1:
problems
public recognition and glory
more people don’t get this recognition, the fact that you get recognition suggests there’s already something valuable about the sport
instrumental value
valuable because it gets you something else valuable
intrinsic value
valueable in itself
reason to play dangerous sport 2:
problems
pleasure and satisfaction
why not just do things that aren’t dangerous but still give pleasure
reason to play dangerous sport 3:
problems
breed courage
is it courage or recklessness
reason to play dangerous sport 4:
problems
outlet for aggression
are they an outlet or do they encourage aggression
Russel view
intrinsic value to danger in sport
learn limits under conditions of duress and danger - satisfaction
self-affirmation
living in the moment
three-pronged approach to ethics of football
harm to players
objectification of the players
harm to others done by the players
when can CTE be diagnosed
autopsy
symptoms of CTE
memory loss, impaired judgement, progressive dementia
harm principle
only interfere with decisions cof competent, consenting adults if they are harming others
counterarguments to nothing is wrong with football due to harm principle
stop kids from playing
can players properly consent without all info about brain injuries
slavery analogy
slavery analogy
should you have the freedom to sell yourself into slavery?
no because then you would no longer have freedom
freedom maximized by not having freedom to sell yourself into slavery
-> serious brain injury from football = lose ability to make free choices -> max freedom by not allowing people to play football
plantation problem
huge amounts of money made off work of black athletes who barely profit
response to plantation problem
college athletes paid in room, board, education
critics of culture of football
football values aggression, violence, and masculinity
violence and football
males who accept that they will get injuries from sport are more likely to engage in outside physical aggression
why has youth football decreased
increased awareness of risks
benefits of children in risky sports
optimal development - risk assessment and management skills - courage, perserverance, resilience
Findler view
youth football is not a reasonable risk
NFL rules to manage head injuries
no tackling during offseason
only 14 full-contact practices during regular season
youth rules to manage head injuries
no national rules
natural behavior used to justifu youth football
counterargument
children and animals have natural inclination toward risky play
natural does not mean permissible
most compelling argument for allowing physical risk to child
the world is physically dangerous, child needs to learn
argument against the benefits that danger provides children - kids like risky play
are these cases analogous to football
its not clear that dangers of football are needed to teach these skills
head injuries undermine decisions and risk management
selt affimation
pressing boundaries and defining self understandings