The Prime Factors

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/76

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 12:41 AM on 5/12/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

77 Terms

1
New cards

Prime factors

Affect x-ray emission and are under DIRECT CONTROL OF RADIOGRAPHER

milliamperage-second (mAs)

kilovoltage (kV)

distance (d)

2
New cards

quantitative factors

-milliamperage-second (primary quantitative)

-kilovoltage

-distance (further away, radiation spreads out more)

-filtration (more stuff in between)

3
New cards

Qualitative factors

how strong it is

Kilovoltage

Filtration

4
New cards

mA

quantity of electrical current flowing through a circuit

5
New cards

how is mA described as

the rate representing the number of electrons passing down a wire per second

6
New cards

mA control of machine

selection which taps different series of resistors in filament circuit to control the intensity of the flow of electricity

7
New cards

when selecting higher mA

greater flow rate of electricity

more electrons in shorter amount of time

8
New cards

Intensity=

quantity

9
New cards

the intensity rate of x-ray beam is

directly controlled by the mA sstation set at console

10
New cards

Number of x-rays created is a product of

number of electrons crossing tube and amount of time electrons are allowed to cross (mAs)

11
New cards

change in mA or mAs

affects the number of electrons

BUT NOT the kinetic energy of electrons flowing from cathode to anode

12
New cards

mAs

product of mA and exposure time (s)

13
New cards

if either mA station or set exposure time is doubled

the total radiation exposure is doubled to both the detector and the patient

14
New cards

mA and exposure time are

inversely proportional

15
New cards

if mA is doubled

time is halved

16
New cards

mAs=

mAs

17
New cards

formula for mAs

mA1xs1=mA2xs2

18
New cards

mAs is the primary controller of

quantity/intensity of x-ray photons (directly proportional)

19
New cards

in film, mAs was

density (directly proportional)

20
New cards

mAs and exposure relationship

direct

if mAs goes up, detector exposure/exposure index goes up

21
New cards

Insufficient mAs produces

underexposed image

quantum mottle

22
New cards

excessive mAs produces

overexposed image

saturation

harder to discern in digital systems but will provide inappropriate EI numbers

23
New cards

kilovoltage (keV or kV)

measure of the electrical force or pressure behind a current of electricity, which causes it to flow

-measure of electrical energy

-greater the potential difference, the more pressur exerted

24
New cards

Due to AC electricity

kV is measured in terms of average value/peak value

(Kilovolt peak KVP)

25
New cards

X-ray beams with higher average energy

Capable of penetrating through different types of tissue

26
New cards

Most important function of kVp

to provide at least partial penetration through all tissues to be recorded

27
New cards

kVp is primary controller of

total quality of x-ray photons

28
New cards

kVp in film

contrast

29
New cards

kVp impacts this as well indirectly

quantity of photons due to more interactions by incident electrons in target material

UNDESIRED SIDE AFFECT

30
New cards

kVp is primary controller of differences in radiographic densities/IR exposures, known as

image contrast (brightness)

31
New cards

As we increase kVp

Increased penetrability, which will result in image with less contrast (think of an abdomen)

32
New cards

15% rule

an increase in kVp by 15% will cause a doubling in exposure'

a decrease by 15% will cause a halving of exposure

33
New cards

If maintaining a particular exposure is desired, but more penetration is needed

increase kVp by 15%

cut mAs in half

34
New cards

kVp adjustments should NOT

be used to control radiographic exposure

35
New cards

Do not oversimplify 15% rule to

10-kVp rule, stating that with every 10 kVp, changes in exposure occur by factor of 2

36
New cards

since kVp controls both quality and quantity of x-ray photons

there will be some increase in patient exposure

37
New cards

using 15% rule to increase kVp increasess

patient exposure by 1/3 (28-38% avg 33%)

38
New cards

however if using 15% rule and cutting mAs in half

then exposure is offset by this 50% cut in quantity of photonss

39
New cards

Using 15% kvp rule averages a

net savings in patient dose of about 1/3

net result for apply 15% rule is exposure averaging about 67% of the original

40
New cards

distance

x-ray photons from a point source begin to spread out or diverge with distance

-causes decrease in intensity

41
New cards

x-ray beam is

divergent

42
New cards

x-ray intensity is measured with a dosimeter

previously recorded in roentgens (R or mR)

now recorded in milliGray (mGy)

43
New cards

more distance

decrease in intensity

44
New cards

As SID is increased and collimators are closed further to maintain field size

Further cutting photons and decreasing intensity

45
New cards

Inverse square law

As distance increases, beam intensity decreases

Amount of exposure received is less

46
New cards

The intensity of radiation at a given distance from the point source iss

inversely proportional to the square of the distance

47
New cards

Inverse square law concerning distance and intensity formula

I1/I2=D2squared/D1squared

I1= original intensity (mR)

I2= new intensity (mR)

D1= original distance

D2= new distance

48
New cards

The concentration of radiation will be

inversely proportional to the square of the distance (at twice the distance, the radiation will be 1/2squared or 1/4 as intense)

49
New cards

Doubling the distance

allows the x-ray beam to spread out over a fourfold area, reducing exposure intensity to one quarter the original

isotropically- evenly all the way around

50
New cards

mAs and detector exposure relationship to distance

As distance increase

Intensity decreases

Decreases IR exposure

Direct Square Law

51
New cards

formula for mAs, detector exposure relationship, and distance

direct square law

-to compensate for SID changes

-determines amount of mAs necessary to provide enough photonss to create an image after SID changes

52
New cards

Direct relationship is necessary to

compensate for the changes in intensity and IR exposure

53
New cards

Direct square law is also known as

exposure maintenance formula

and density maintenance formula (for film)

54
New cards

Exposure maintenance formula

mAs1/mAs2=D1^2/D2^2

or

mAs2= mAs1 x D2^2/ D1^2

55
New cards

Exposure maintenance dissected

Direct square law also applies to each individual component of mAs- ma or s separately

mA1/mA2= D1^2/D2^2

T1/T2= D1^2/D2^2

56
New cards

Increasing SID

-reduces patient dose

-increases spatial resolution

-reduces magnification

-because of reduced magnification of anatomy within field, more of body part can be included with projection

57
New cards

Technique changes mobile radiography application

knowt flashcard image
58
New cards

with digital imaging systems

the relationship of kvp being contrast and mAs being density has been decoupled

59
New cards

brightness and contrast are now controlled primarily through

post-processing

60
New cards

milliamperage

measures the rate of electricity flowing through the X-ray tube, and controls the x-rays emitted from it

61
New cards

mA stations at console

select from diffrent resistors to control amount of amperage flowing through the filament to maintain a steady space charge boiled off by thermionic emission

62
New cards

mAs overall

controls the totaly amount of x-rays delivered from x-ray tube during exposure

63
New cards

mAs is preferred controlling factor for

total exposure/intensity

64
New cards

overexposure from excessive mAs

is not apparent in digital images, and can only be monitored by checking the expossure indicator readout

65
New cards

mAs is not considered a factor in controlling

contrast

66
New cards

mAs has no direct relationship with recognizability factors such as

sharpness, magnificaation, distortion

however, shorter exposure times make unsharpness due to motion less likely to occur

67
New cards

the predominance of different tissues within a body part

determine minimum kVp that should be used

68
New cards

no amount of radiation intensity can ever compensate for

insufficient penetration of x-ray beam

69
New cards

a 15% change in kVp

alters intensity of radiation reaching detector by a factor of 2

70
New cards

optimum kVp

level well above the minimum needed for sufficient penetration, which strikes a balance between saving patient exposure and preventing excessive scatter

71
New cards

kvp has no direct impact on the geometrical aspects of image

sharpnesss, magnification, distortion

72
New cards

increasing SID

reduced exposure intensity at detector by inverse square of distance, because x-rays spread out isotropically

73
New cards

when should technique be adjusted to compensate SID

any change greater than 15%

74
New cards

adjustment for radiographic technique for changes in SID follows

direct square law

75
New cards

rule of thumb for distance changes from 40'' to 72''

adjust technique by 3x

76
New cards

increased SID

if increase in SSD

77
New cards

because source to skin distance changes by a greater ratio than SID

increased SID can be used to reduce patient skin dose