1/68
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
National Org & Culture
Collect mental programming in different social environments
Culture is hard to change b/c embedded in identity
Culture reduced uncertainty and gives us a higher sense of control, which makes us feel more secure
Differences in National Org & Culture
•Individualism-collectivism
•Power distance
•Uncertainty avoidance
•Masculinity - femininity
What happens if we try to change culture?
People get upset like when you take a blanket from a baby b/c people don’t like change (like knowing what’s going to happen, norms)
Orgs want to change culture when they’re doing well or bad. When they’re doing bad, employees want to feel certain, and changing the culture makes them feel uncertain.
Individual-collectivism
Individuals put individuals before the group, personal identity is the most important. For collective put groups first, and social identity is the most important.
High power distance
It makes them uncomfortable to disagree or interject with superior
High uncertainty avoidance
Rely on procedures and knowing all the information
Masculinity - Femininity
Patriarchy or matriarchy
Organizational Culture Defined
Shared values, norms, and assumptions
What is important/unimportant
Allows us to predict behavior, increase perceived control, decrease uncertainty
How do you know what an organizational culture is?
Think of the iceberg.
Organizational Culture Artifacts:
What you can see above the water (tip of the iceberg): These are signals
Structures, language, rituals and ceremonies, stories
Under the water, Organizational Culture:
Shared values and norms (informal rules)
Shared assumptions
Content of Organizational Culture
Researchers have a hard time measuring b/c there are a lot of different values a company might have, ignore shared assumptions, and assume culture is clear.
When measuring, don’t try to get a complete picture of the culture (1 or 2 elements only)
There are subcultures anyway
Dominant Culture
Values/assumptions shared most consistently and widely
Subcultures
Located throughout the organization.
May support, oppose, or not affect the dominant culture.
Countercultures oppose aspects of the dominant culture.
Some firms have subcultures without a dominant culture
Two functions of countercultures:
Surveillance and critical review.
Source of emerging values.
Organizational Culture Strength
How much do employees hold culture’s values and assumptions?
Most employees embrace the culture, which is supported by artifacts (stories, language, structure)
Functions of strong cultures?
Control system: everyone is watching your behavior to see if you fit in
Social glue: cohesiveness, people feel like they fit in
Sense making: provides norms to reduce uncertainty so we can predict how people are going to behave
Stronger culture = more effort should put in to fit in
Culture & Organizational Effectiveness
Functions of strong cultures impacts organizational performance and employee well-being.
Benefits of culture strength depends on if it fits the environment, not cult like, and if its adaptive.
When there is a merger, there are 4 things that can happen:
Assimilation, Deculturation, Integration, Separation
Assimilation
Acquired firm staff embrace acquiring culture.
Deculturation
Acquiring firm imposes its culture and practices.
Integration
Composite culture preserves best of both firms’ cultures.
Separation
Merged firms keep their own corporate cultures and practices.
Which strategy for merging cultures is best?
It depends
Changing & Strengthening Organizational Culture
Align artifacts with desired culture
Culturally consistent rewards (what gets measured and is rewarded is done well, but what if the narcissist is getting rewarded)
Support workforce stability and communication (helps manage expectations)
Model desired culture through founders and leaders
Use attraction, selection, and socialization
People don’t like when culture changes
Attraction Selection Attrition Theory
Culture strength increases when:
•Attraction: Applicants self-select based on compatible values.
•Selection: Firms select applicants with compatible values.
Attrition: Employees with incompatible values quit/removed
Culture Fit vs Add
Culture Fit:
Encourages unfair discrimination hiring (“mirror” approach).
Creates a corporate cult.
Culture Add:
Congruent with culture, but not aligned to increase diversity
Organizational Socialization
Newcomers are taught the values, expected behaviors, and social knowledge from coworkers
Stages of Organizational Socialization
Preemployment socialization: learn about org and expectations (sociological contract)
Encounter (new hire): Test expectations against reality (cognitive dissonance)
Role management: Once we realize not what we expected, manage role that we have and make the best of it with work relationships
Socialization outcomes: Higher motivation, loyalty, and satisfaction. Lower stress & turnover
Motivation
Is not a trait, so people aren’t inherently motivated or unmotivated
Expectancy Theory
Acting in a certain way depends on the strength of an expectation that the act will be followed by a given outcome and on the attractiveness of that outcome to the individual
Effort-Performance: Do employees believe they can achieve the goal? If not, need more support and training to obtain the skills they need. Otherwise, any program implemented will fail.
Performance-Reward: Do employees believe they will get the reward promised? If they don’t, not motivated to try.
Reward-Personal goal: How motivated are you by free t shirts? If you don’t want the reward, won’t be motivated. Money is a good incentive.
Effort→performance→organizational reward→personal goals
Expectancy Theory Example
We want BMW employees to put the antennas on cars faster:
If they try harder can they stick antennas on the car faster?
Maybe or maybe not
If they perform at a higher layer, will it make stock price go up?
Probably not
If stock price goes up, does it help personal goals?
Give employees more money, which is motivating
Reinforcement Theory
A person engages in a specific behavior because that behavior has been reinforced by a specific outcome.
This brings up the idea of punishment. If person behaves counter productively, punish behavior.
Does it work? No.
Discipline programs should be progressive and documented.If you don’t have consistent programs, behavior repeats, and other employees pick them up.
Rewards: Raises are motivating at first, but effect diminishes. Should still have raises, but raises alone wont have long term positive impacts on motivation.
Hierarchy of Needs
Results in higher needs motivates us. Instead of paying employees more, make them feel special.
Not supported by research (if test question asks)
Social Learning Theory
Observational learning where people learn behaviors by observing others and then modeling the behaviors perceived as being effective
How we learn the most at work
Cognitive Evaluation Theory
Giving people rewards for things they were already internally rewarded to do decreases level of motivation.
Need to raise test scores.
Can be raised through more reading. How to motivate kids to read? Give pizza.
Long term implication of this? If I already loved reading, motivation changes because reading because you love it turns to I read for pizza.
Goal Setting Theory
Working towards a goal as source of motivation
They tell us what to do and what effort is needed
SMART Goals
When a goal becomes impossible, relationship between effort and performance goes to 0.
You want to use goals to increase sales, currently sell 15 cars. New goal should be 20 goals.
Procedural justice
Are policies and procedures fair and do we follow them?
(Following your own rules)
This minimizes discrimination
Distributive justice
Are we happy with what we get? (Salary, raise, bonus, healthcare plan)
Interactional/interpersonal justice
High interpersonal is when we treat people with respect.
Informational justice (transparency)
Explaining to people why something is happening. If we don’t get the explanation, signals that we don’t matter.
Equity Theory
Comparing my outcome/input ratio to other’s.
Want a balance between inputs and outputs.
If we believe my inputs are greater for the same output as other people’s, then will ask for more outputs (like pay).
If there is a refusal, counterproductive behavior, revenge cognitions.
Is stress bad?
Potentially threatening or demanding events. Stress we can’t handle (strain) is bad
Stress Response Process
There is a stressor
Cognitive Appraisal: how much stress?
Think of coping mechanism
If we can’t cope, there is strain
Strain leads to poor well-being
Modern Work Roles
Contain physical and psycho social stressors.
People are less evolved to deal with psycho social stressors.
Psycho Social Stressors
Conflicting roles (work, family, school)
Role related demands
Role Conflict
One role is incompatible with demands of another role (Need to work, but have to pick up kids from school)
intra sender: mixed messages (ask to do creative inquiry in job, but will get fired if not publishing research)
inter sender: 2 bosses (multiple people give directions and the information about what you do conflicts)
inter-role: Different roles conflict (work vs family)
person-role: skills & values the role requires differs from the skills you posses (quit the role that is conflicting with your values, transition to a different role, change the role)
Organizational Constraints
Occurs when:
Lack of resources
Interferes with task performance
Situational elements beyond control
Perceived organizational obstruction
Role Ambiguity
Don’t know responsibilities, task, performance goals
Role Overload
Quantitative:Too much to do and not enough time
Qualitative: Not able to do the job
Role Underload
Quantitative: Not enough work
Qualitative: Job is boring
Burn Out
Results from chronic workplace stress that’s not properly managed
Causes depression, anxiety, distraction, difficulty regulating emotions
Why is burn out not addressed in the US?
In the US, pull yourself up by your bootstrap culture means burn out is not addressed
Is burn out our fault?
Can be if you don’t set boundaries & take a job you don’t like
Stages of Burn Out
Emotional exhaustion: At the end of the day you feel drained out and tired
Depersonalization: Cynical, tend to be less personal with other people
Diminished Personal Achievement: Reduced performance
U Model of Arousal
Rust Out: Not enough work to do, low performance
Eustress: Optimal arousal
Burnout: Too much work, low performance
NOT MOTIVATION APEX - DON’T CHOOSE THAT ANSWER CHOICE
Cross Over
If you spend time with people burnt out, more likely to get burnt out yourself
Become more engaged if around others who are more engaged
Emotional Contagion
Automatic process.
Walk down the hall and someone smiles at you, smile back
Mirror neurons
Interpersonal Effects
Cross over, emotional contagion, displaced aggression
Displaced Aggression
Mistreat someone because someone mistreats us.
Boss yells at employee, employee yells at spouse
How to reduce stress & negative outcomes from stress?
Less stress & less negative outcomes from stress when:
Active & healthy life style
Good coping strategies
Low neuroticism, high extroversion
High self esteem, self-efficacy, internal locus of control
Not a workaholic or perfectionist
What to do about stress
Think about what your thankful for
Exercise
Disconnect from stress
Have social support
Can avoid strain by thinking of stress positively
Job Demand-Control Model
Relationship between having control over demands and job strain
Self Compassion
Reduces strain and burnout.
3 parts:
Self Kindness: Warm towards yourself, not judgement
Common Humanity: Everyone makes mistakes
Mindfulness: Acknowledge pain, but not letting it be overwhelming
Mindfulness
When you experience failure, “this is a moment of struggle”
Prevents repression
Common Humanity
“I am not the only person who feels that way”
Prevents feeling of isolation
Self-Kindness
“What do I need to hear right now” and give yourself a supportive touch
Mindfulness vs Hopefulness
Sometimes being mindful is worse than being hopeful. Need to look positively to the future rather than where it sucks in the present.
What does a leader have
Tough to assign a value since it can vary so much
They all have followers
Trait Theories of Leadership
What are the traits that become a leader and become effective in that role?
(Little success in predicting which traits)
Big Five
Non trivial correlations with leadership emergence and effectiveness.
This means openness to experience, agreeableness, etc. are not related to how effective a leader will be once in the role.
Dark and Bright Traits w/ Leadership
Narcissism: Abuse subordinates
Psychopathy
Machiavellian: Seek control over others
They want to become leaders, but may not be effective because they take risks to glorify themselves.