mens rea

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/50

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 9:32 AM on 6/13/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

51 Terms

1
New cards

What is mens rea?

The mental element of a crime.

2
New cards

What are the main forms of mens rea?

Intention, recklessness and sometimes knowledge/belief.

3
New cards

What is direct intention?

Where a consequence is D's aim, purpose or desire.

4
New cards

Which case defines direct intention?

Mohan (1976).

5
New cards

Facts of Mohan?

Drove a car at a police officer. Direct intention exists where a result is D's aim or purpose.

6
New cards

What is oblique intention?

Where the result is not D's aim but is virtually certain to occur.

7
New cards

Which case established the modern oblique intention test?

Woollin (1998).

8
New cards

What is the Woollin test?

The jury may find intention if death or serious injury was a virtual certainty and D appreciated that fact.

9
New cards

Which case first discussed virtual certainty?

Nedrick (1986).

10
New cards

Facts of Nedrick?

D set fire to a house and a child died. Virtual certainty could amount to intention.

11
New cards

What is recklessness?

Consciously taking an unjustified risk.

12
New cards

Which case established the modern test for recklessness?

R v G (2003).

13
New cards

What is the R v G test?

D must actually foresee a risk and unreasonably take it.

14
New cards

Facts of R v G?

Two boys started a fire. They did not foresee the risk, so were not reckless.

15
New cards

Which case established the old objective recklessness test?

Caldwell (1982).

16
New cards

Why was Caldwell overruled?

It unfairly convicted people who did not actually foresee the risk.

17
New cards

What is subjective recklessness?

D actually foresaw the risk.

18
New cards

What is objective recklessness?

D ought to have foreseen the risk.

19
New cards

What is transferred malice?

D's mens rea can transfer from the intended victim to the actual victim.

20
New cards

Which case established transferred malice?

Latimer (1886).

21
New cards

Facts of Latimer?

D struck one person but hit another. Intent transferred.

22
New cards

What is coincidence of AR and MR?

The actus reus and mens rea must occur at the same time.

23
New cards

Which case established the continuing act principle?

Fagan v MPC (1969).

24
New cards

Facts of Fagan?

D accidentally drove onto a police officer's foot but then refused to move. The act was treated as continuing.

25
New cards

Which case established the single transaction principle?

Thabo Meli (1954).

26
New cards

Facts of Thabo Meli?

Ds thought victim was dead and disposed of the body. The events were one transaction.

27
New cards

What is strict liability?

An offence where mens rea is not required for one or more elements.

28
New cards

Which case concerns strict liability and age?

Prince (1875).

29
New cards

Facts of Prince?

D took a girl believed to be older than she was. Liability despite mistake as to age.

30
New cards

What is a mistake of fact?

A mistaken belief about facts which may negate mens rea.

31
New cards

When can a mistake provide a defence?

When it prevents the required mens rea from being formed.

32
New cards

Which case shows an honest mistake can be a defence?

Williams (Gladstone) (1984).

33
New cards

Facts of Williams?

D honestly believed he was preventing a crime and lacked mens rea.

34
New cards

What is intention for murder?

Intention to kill or cause GBH.

35
New cards

Which case established that intent to cause GBH is enough for murder?

Vickers (1957).

36
New cards

Facts of Vickers?

Intent to cause serious injury is sufficient mens rea for murder.

37
New cards

What is Cunningham recklessness?

Foreseeing a risk and going ahead anyway.

38
New cards

Which case established Cunningham recklessness?

Cunningham (1957).

39
New cards

Facts of Cunningham?

D tore a gas meter from a wall and gas escaped into a neighbouring property.

40
New cards

What are the two elements of recklessness under R v G?

Foreseeing the risk and unreasonably taking the risk.

41
New cards

Which offences commonly require recklessness?

Criminal damage, assault, battery and some non-fatal offences.

42
New cards

What is knowledge?

Awareness that a fact or circumstance exists.

43
New cards

What is belief?

Acceptance that something is true even if it later proves false.

44
New cards

What is the difference between direct and oblique intention?

Direct intention is D's aim; oblique intention concerns virtually certain consequences.

45
New cards

What is the difference between intention and recklessness?

Intention aims at a result; recklessness foresees a risk of a result.

46
New cards

What are the key mens rea cases?

Mohan, Nedrick, Woollin, Cunningham, Caldwell, R v G, Latimer, Fagan, Thabo Meli, Vickers.

47
New cards

What is the mens rea for theft?

Dishonesty and intention to permanently deprive.

48
New cards

What is the mens rea for robbery?

The mens rea for theft plus intention to use force to steal.

49
New cards

What is the mens rea for burglary s9(1)(a)?

Intention to steal, inflict GBH or cause criminal damage at the point of entry.

50
New cards

What is the mens rea for criminal damage?

Intention or recklessness as to the damage.

51
New cards

What is the mens rea for murder?

Intention to kill or cause GBH.