1/21
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Words can ammount to an assult
R v Constanza
Silent phonecalls can be an assult
R v Ireland
Slight touch can ammount to a battery
Collins v Wilcock
Touching clothes can be a battery
R v Thomas
indirect battery
DDP v K
poured acid in a hand dryer
"ordinary jostling" in everyday life (like bumping into someone on a crowded train) is not a battery because there is implied consent to the physical contact of daily life.
Wilson v Pringle
it only matters that the victim feared immediate force even if treat wasnt real
Logdon v DPP
Any hurt/injury that interferes with the health and comfort of the vitctim is ABH
R v Miller
Loss of consciousnes ammounts to ABH
T v DDP
DPP v Smith
ABH includes damage to a persons hair
A wound must break 2 layers of skin
JJC v Eisenhower
GBH means “really serious harm”
DPP v Smith
Serious psychiatric harm can ammount to GBH
R v Burstow
R v Smith
Immediate was defined as the victim not knowing what the defendant will do next.
actus reus and mens rea of s.20
wounding or inflicting GBH
intention or recklessness as to causing some harm
actus reus and mens rea of s.18
wounding or causing GBH
Intention to cause GBH or resist/prevent arrest
intention to wound is not enough for mens rea of s.18
R v Taylor
In s.20 there is no requirement for D to intend or be reckless about inflicting a wound or GBH
R v Pamenter
indirect intention test- Woolin
The reasonable person could foresee GBH was virtually certain to occur from such actions and the defendant realised this
inflict gbh
Actus reus of s.20
cause gbh
Actus reus of s.18
A combination of injuries can be GBH
Brown and Stratton