Non fatal offences

0.0(0)
Studied by 3 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/21

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Last updated 9:02 AM on 4/14/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

22 Terms

1
New cards

Words can ammount to an assult

R v Constanza

2
New cards

Silent phonecalls can be an assult

R v Ireland

3
New cards

Slight touch can ammount to a battery

Collins v Wilcock

4
New cards

Touching clothes can be a battery

R v Thomas

5
New cards

indirect battery

DDP v K

poured acid in a hand dryer

6
New cards

"ordinary jostling" in everyday life (like bumping into someone on a crowded train) is not a battery because there is implied consent to the physical contact of daily life.

Wilson v Pringle

7
New cards

it only matters that the victim feared immediate force even if treat wasnt real

Logdon v DPP

8
New cards

Any hurt/injury that interferes with the health and comfort of the vitctim is ABH

R v Miller

9
New cards

Loss of consciousnes ammounts to ABH

T v DDP

10
New cards

DPP v Smith

ABH includes damage to a persons hair

11
New cards

A wound must break 2 layers of skin

JJC v Eisenhower

12
New cards

GBH means “really serious harm”

DPP v Smith

13
New cards

Serious psychiatric harm can ammount to GBH

R v Burstow

14
New cards

R v Smith

Immediate was defined as the victim not knowing what the defendant will do next.

15
New cards

actus reus and mens rea of s.20

wounding or inflicting GBH

intention or recklessness as to causing some harm

16
New cards

actus reus and mens rea of s.18

wounding or causing GBH

Intention to cause GBH or resist/prevent arrest

17
New cards

intention to wound is not enough for mens rea of s.18

R v Taylor

18
New cards

In s.20 there is no requirement for D to intend or be reckless about inflicting a wound or GBH

R v Pamenter

19
New cards

indirect intention test- Woolin

The reasonable person could foresee GBH was virtually certain to occur from such actions and the defendant realised this

20
New cards

inflict gbh

Actus reus of s.20

21
New cards

cause gbh

Actus reus of s.18

22
New cards

A combination of injuries can be GBH

Brown and Stratton