1/5
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Outline Bowlby’s monotropic theory of attachment
Attachment is innate (we are born with it).
It is evolutionary because it increases an infant’s chances of survival.
Babies seek proximity to a caregiver for protection and safety.
Infants form one special attachment called monotropy.
The primary attachment figure acts as a secure base for exploration and comfort
What are social releasers and the sensitive period?
Babies are born with social releasers such as crying, smiling and gripping.
These behaviours encourage adults to provide care.
Through reciprocity, caregivers respond to the infant's signals.
Bowlby proposed a sensitive period of approximately the first 2 years of life.
Attachments formed during this period are important for healthy development
What is Bowlby’s internal working model?
The internal working model is a mental template for future relationships.
It develops from the child's first attachment.
Secure attachments lead to more positive future relationships.
Insecure attachments may lead to relationship difficulties.
This idea is known as the continuity hypothesis
What evidence supports Bowlby’s theory?
Animal studies support the idea of a sensitive period.
Lorenz's geese showed attachment occurring shortly after birth.
Research has found links between early attachment and later relationships.
This supports the continuity hypothesis and internal working model.
What evidence challenges Bowlby’s theory?
Schaffer and Emerson found that infants often form multiple attachments.
Many babies become attached to several caregivers, not just one.
This challenges Bowlby's concept of monotropy.
Suggests attachment is more flexible than Bowlby proposed
How does learning theory challenge Bowlby?
Learning theory suggests attachment develops through conditioning.
The caregiver who provides food becomes associated with reward.
This is known as the cupboard love explanation.
It challenges Bowlby's claim that attachment is innate and evolutionary