Tort Law: Negligence, Liability, and Nuisance

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/32

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

This set of vocabulary flashcards covers key concepts, legal tests, and case law definitions for the law of torts, including Negligence, Occupiers' Liability, Private Nuisance, Rylands v Fletcher, and Vicarious Liability.

Last updated 9:02 AM on 5/26/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

33 Terms

1
New cards

Negligence

A legal concept defined in Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks as "failing to do something which the reasonable person would do or doing something which the reasonable person would not do."

2
New cards

Duty of Care

A step in establishing negligence that aims to create a legal relationship between parties and acts as a tool for widening the scope of liability.

3
New cards

The Robinson Approach

The principle that a judge should first look to existing precedent or a statutory obligation when deciding whether a duty of care exists.

4
New cards

The Caparo Test

A 33 part test applied in novel situations where no precedent exists to determine a duty of care, involving reasonable foreseeability, proximity, and whether it is fair, just, and reasonable to impose a duty.

5
New cards

Reasonable Foreseeability

An objective test asking if a reasonable person in the defendant’s position would have foreseen that their act or omission might harm others.

6
New cards

Proximity

The 'closeness' between the claimant and defendant, which can be established in a physical sense (time and space) or through a legal relationship.

7
New cards

Fair, Just and Reasonable

The final part of the Caparo test involving a policy-based decision by judges to consider the best interests of society and limit the scope of negligence claims.

8
New cards

Breach of Duty

Occurs when a defendant fails to act as a reasonable person would, involving a comparison of conduct against the standard of care and consideration of risk factors.

9
New cards

The Reasonable Person

A person of average intelligence, self-control, skill, and experience who is neither excessively cautious nor unusually risk-taking.

10
New cards

Factual Causation

Determined by the 'but for' test, asking whether the claimant would have suffered damage but for the defendant's act or omission.

11
New cards

Novus Actus Interveniens

An intervening act that breaks the chain of causation, such as the unreasonable conduct of a third party in Knightley v Johns.

12
New cards

Remoteness of Damage

A rule stating that a claimant can only recover loss that is a reasonably foreseeable result of the defendant's breach.

13
New cards

Egg-shell Skull Rule

The principle that if the type of injury is foreseeable, the defendant is liable for the full extent of the harm even if the claimant had a pre-existing condition, such as in Smith v Leech Brain (19621962).

14
New cards

Occupier

In Occupiers’ liability, the person who has a sufficient degree of control over the premises, as established in Wheat v Lacon.

15
New cards

Premises

Broadly defined in s.1(2)1(2) of the Occupiers' Liability Act to include land, buildings, vehicles, and fixed or moveable structures like lifts or ladders.

16
New cards

Lawful Visitor

A person with express or implied permission, or a contractual or legal right, to enter a premises.

17
New cards

Standard of Care (OLA 19571957)

Under s.2(2)2(2), the duty to take such care as is reasonable to keep the visitor reasonably safe for the purpose for which they are invited.

18
New cards

Independent Contractor Defence

Under s.2(4)(b)2(4)(b) of OLA 19571957, an occupier is not liable for contractor negligence if it was reasonable to hire them, they were competent, and work was inspected if possible.

19
New cards

Trespasser

A person who has no permission to be on the premises or one who has exceeded the permission granted.

20
New cards

Occupiers' Liability Act 19841984

Legislation governing the duty owed to trespassers for personal injury, provided the occupier is aware of the danger and the trespasser's proximity.

21
New cards

Private Nuisance

As defined in Fearn v Tate Gallery, a use of land which substantially interferes with the ordinary use and enjoyment of neighbouring land.

22
New cards

Loss of Amenity

A form of substantial interference in nuisance involving inconvenience that affects the ordinary comfort of human existence, such as smells or noise.

23
New cards

Prescription

A defence in private nuisance where the defendant has carried out the activity for at least 2020 years without complaint after it became an actionable nuisance.

24
New cards

Statutory Authority

A defence used when the nuisance is created by a public body acting under an Act of Parliament, such as in Allen v Gulf Oil.

25
New cards

Abatement

A remedy in nuisance allowing the claimant to take reasonable steps to deal with the nuisance themselves, such as unblocking a drain.

26
New cards

Rylands v Fletcher

A tort of strict liability where a person who brings a dangerous thing onto their land for a non-natural use is liable if it escapes and causes foreseeable damage.

27
New cards

Non-natural Use

An extraordinary and unusual use of land that brings increased danger to others, rather than ordinary domestic use.

28
New cards

Vicarious Liability

A form of liability where an employer is held liable for a tort committed by an employee in the course of their employment.

29
New cards

Control Test

A traditional test for employment focusing on the employer’s power to direct the way work is performed, as in Mersey Docks.

30
New cards

Integration Test

A test for employment status where a worker is an employee if their work is fully integrated into the business rather than just accessory to it.

31
New cards

Economic Reality Test

A test for employment status considering if the worker provides skill for a wage and is subject to employer control and other contractual factors.

32
New cards

Close Connection Test

Used to determine if a tort was committed in the course of employment by asking if the wrongful conduct is closely connected to authorized acts.

33
New cards

Frolic of their own

An instance where an employee causes damage while doing something unrelated to their employment, relieving the employer of vicarious liability.