Logical Inquiry Exam 1

0.0(0)
Studied by 2 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/18

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Last updated 5:45 AM on 9/25/23
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

19 Terms

1
New cards

What are the value assumptions?

assumption regarding the authors relative importance of conflicting priorities.

2
New cards

What is an ambiguous term?

a word or phrase that is capable of being reasonably understood as having more than one plausible meaning even given context.

3
New cards

What are the descriptive assumptions?

an assumption of fact about the way the world was, is, or will be of states of affairs.

ex) i will study for my exam so that i will get a good grade.

4
New cards

Attention Fallacy

A fallacy is a reasoning “trick” that someone might use

while trying to persuade you to accept a conclusion.

5
New cards

Fallacy: Ad Hominem:

An attack on the person, rather than directly addressing the person’s reasons.

6
New cards

Fallacy: Narrative:

Assuming incorrectly that because we can tell a story that seems to explain the occurrence of a set of facts, we now understand the links relating the facts to one another.

7
New cards

Fallacy: Slippery Slope:

Making the assumption that a proposed step will set off an uncontrollable chain of undesirable events, when procedures exist to prevent such a chain of events.

8
New cards

Fallacy: Searching for Perfect Solution:

Falsely assuming that because part of a

problem remains after a solution is tried, the solution should not be adopted.

9
New cards

Fallacy: Appeal to Popularity (Ad Populum):

An attempt to justify a claim by appealing to sentiments that large groups of people have in common; falsely assumes that anything favored by a large group is desirable.

10
New cards

Fallacy: Appeal to Questionable Authority:

Supporting a conclusion by citing an authority who lacks special expertise on the issue at hand.

11
New cards

Fallacy: Appeal to Emotion:

The use of emotionally charged language to distract readers and listeners from relevant reasons and evidence. Common emotions appealed to are fear, hope, patriotism, pity, and sympathy.

12
New cards

Fallacy: Straw Person:

Distorting our opponent’s point of view so that it is easy to attack; thus we attack a point of view that does not truly exist.

13
New cards

Fallacy: Either-Or (or False Dilemma):

Assuming only two alternatives when there are more than two.

14
New cards

Fallacy: Explaining by Naming:

Falsely assuming that because you have provided a name for some event or behavior, you have also adequately explained the event.

15
New cards

Fallacy: The Planning Fallacy:

The tendency for people or organizations to underestimate how long they will need to complete a task, despite numerous prior experiences of having underestimated how long something would take to finish.

16
New cards

Fallacy: Glittering Generality:

The use of vague, emotionally appealing virtue words that dispose us to approve something without closely examining the reasons.

17
New cards

Fallacy: Red Herring:

An irrelevant topic is presented to divert attention from the original issue and help to win an argument by shifting attention away from the argument and to another issue. The fallacy sequence in this instance is as follows: (a) Topic A is being discussed; (b) Topic B is introduced as though it is relevant to topic A, but it is not; and (c) Topic A is abandoned.

18
New cards

Fallacy: Begging the Question:

An argument in which the conclusion is assumed in

the reasoning.

19
New cards

equivocation

when an argument relies on the shifting meaning of some key term to be convincing or to work at all