1/16
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
types of uncertainty
job loss with no notice
stock markets boom or bust unpredictably
unanticipated social security reforms may affect age of retirement or size of pension
accounting for uncertainty
intertemporal consumption choices make explicit assumptions about the nature of the uncertainty that consumers face, regarding income, duration of life, fire ect.
what must we first determine about economic models under uncertainty
whether there are markets for individuals to take insurance for the risk they face
complete markets
a complete set of contingent consumption claims traded before uncertainty is resolved, two individuals in good and bad states agree to share income, the one in the good state shares income with the one in the bad state to eliminate risk
reasons why we do not have complete markets
aggregate risks
frictions
aggregate risks
these are risks that affect everyone, pandemic, you cannot be insured as there is no one to pay you
frictions
private information → cannot truly tell if someone is unlucky or just lying, everyone could claim even though they may not have experienced it
limited commitment → people may refuse to pay when they are meant to
reasons for limited commitment (Alvares and Jermann, 2000)
high persistence of income shocks
low time preference
near-zero variance of income shock
low risk aversion
distinction of risk and uncertainty (Knight, 1921)
risk → can assign a probability, so it is insurable
uncertainty → cannot assign probability, so it is harder to value
incomplete markets
the two period model exists within this, this model is the reality
precautionary saving
consumers will save extra money as a buffer against bad outcomes
modeling uncertainty
in period 1 there is only two possible outcomes
good state yg1with probability π
bad state y1b with probability 1 - π
expected income equals
Ey1=y0
consumer’s problem under incomplete markets
in period 0 the household chooses consumption today, savings, or consumption tomorrow
saving transfers purchasing power from period 0 to period 1
markets are incomplete → cannot buy insurance that pays out differently in good or bad states
savings only move across time not nature
changes in risk with saving
when risk increases precautionary saving increases (more saving today, lower current consumption)
precautionary saving literature Hubbard et al., 1994; Aiyagari, 1994
income uncertainty encourages extra saving
UK evidence (Angelopoulos, Lazarakis, Malley, 2020)
Higher income risk → higher savings → lower wealth inequality. (People who face more uncertainty save more, which can reduce differences in wealth across households.)