1/185
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Theory of Mind
4 or 5: rudimentary but organized set of ideas about people’s behavior
Desires and beliefs = motivations for actions
At 5 understand that people will act on even false beliefs
Harder for autistic children
Moral Judgment
Piaget’s heteronomous morality where young children think rules can’t change and emphasize consequence
Piaget’s autonomous stage where rules can change and understand importance of motivations
Piaget = imperfect but foundation
Kohlberg’s preconventional, conventional, and postconventional = discontinuous stages reflecting cognitive growth
Not clear with continuity or across cultures
Social domains = environmental influences → moral, societal, personal
Conscience develops slowly
Parental standards are effective with secure attachments and no abuse of power
Temperament relevant
Prosocial Behavior
Voluntary, intend to benefit another
Emerge after 1 and increase
Individual differences
Heredity affects empathy and behavior
Positive relationships and examples from adults → prosocial children
School-based interventions for cooperation and perspective-taking
Antisocial Behavior
Aggression starts before 1 and increases
Physical aggression goes down in preschool
Elementary school: relational aggression and stealing
Boys > girls from preschool on
Early individual differences and conduct problems → later antisocial
Biological factors
Social cognition: aggressive children have and assume hostility
Family issues, stress, and inconsistency
Antisocial peers…aggressive children often seek them out
Aggression varies culturally
Conduct disorder or ODD → severe problems
Interventions for high-risk schools = social and emotional help
Theory of Mind: Frontal Lobe
Development drives info processing skills
Development also related to social cognition
Theory of Mind: Social Cognition
Role of cognitive processes in social interaction
Cognitive representations of social info
Bi-directional influence
Relevant to social psych
Theory of Mind
The construal of people as psychological beings
Seeing oneself and others in terms of mental states
Mental States
Intentions/goals, beliefs, desires/preferences
Theory of Mind: Timing of Development
Piaget: concrete operational stage (7-11) with mountain task as evidence
Children demonstrate understanding others’ intentions and desires during infancy and toddlerhood
Hand reaching
Emotional desires
Different kids understand things at different times
Beliefs are difficult
Theory of Mind: Understanding Mental States
1. Infants recognize people as distinct from objects
2. Understand goals/intentions
Theory of Mind: 3. Recognize diverse desires/preferences
Repacholi and Gopnik
14 month-olds gave experimenter own preferred food
18 month-olds gave experimenter her preferred food
Inhibiting own preference is necessary
This takes longer
Theory of Mind: 4. Recognize diverse beliefs
Complex
Beliefs can be false and do not reflect true reality
Beliefs about beliefs
False-belief understanding
Demonstrates children’s ability to distinguish minds from the external world
Theory of Mind: False Contents Task
Box, should have smarties
Actually pencil
What does new character think is in the box?
3-year-olds: pencils
4/5-year-olds: smarties
Theory of Mind: False Location Task
Sally puts marble in Sally’s basket
Anne moves to her box when Sally is gone
Where will Sally look?
5-year-olds can recognize her false belief > reality, Sally will look in her basket
Shift from younger preschool → older preschool / elementary school
Theory of Mind: Limitations of False Belief Tasks
Wording of question
Limited short-term memory abilities
Performance partly due to executive functions
Looking time implicit tasks with expected and unexpected
Looked longer at unexpected, have implicit understanding in infancy
Lying, Prosocial, and Antisocial Behavior: Social Implications of Theory of Mind
Skills → more socially competent?
How so?
Correlational studies
Prosocial behavior
Interpersonal interaction
Peer acceptance and popularity
Unsure about directionality
Lying Behavior
Ding et al
Would theory of mind training change lying likelihood?
Goal of lying = give someone false belief
Participants = 3-year-olds without lying tendencies
Being taught skills increased ability to lie
Prosocial Behavior
Behaviors performed to benefit others
Sharing
Helping
Comforting
Informing
Clear in children’s everyday life and in labs
As young as 14 months
Some think children are naturally immoral, aggressive, and selfish and need to be taught generosity
Others think children are naturally kind, fair, and become selfish through development, teaching, or socialization
More evidence
Prosocial behavior is intuitive and early-emerging
People are happiest after giving to others > self-serving
Emotion reinforces behavior
Lying, Prosocial, and Antisocial Behavior: Empathy and Sympathy
Empathy = experiencing someone else’s emotion
Sympathy = feeling bad or supportive of someone
Children experience these
Learning to regulate and use for good
Navigating with others
Lying, Prosocial, and Antisocial Behavior: Induction
Point out effects of misbehavior on others
Note others’ distress
Make clear the child caused the distress
Empathy-based guilt (can be repaired)
Guilt = adaptive emotion
Lying, Prosocial, and Antisocial Behavior: Aggression
Classifying by motive
Proactive
Reactive
Classifying by form
Direct
Relational
Hostile attribution bias
Proactive Aggression
Behaving aggressively to reach specific goal
Reactive Aggression
Response to threat
Direct Aggression
Obvious, overt, physical or yelling
Relational Aggression
Focused on damaging relationships, less obvious and harms reputation and self-esteem
Hostile Attribution Bias
Tendency to see others’ behavior as hostile
Children with this see accidental behaviors as threats → aggression
Moral Reasoning: Kohlberg’s Theory
Cognitive developmental theory
Emphasis on moral reasoning, particularly about moral dilemmas
Stage theory based on Piaget’s cognitive stages
Preconventional → conventional → post
The way an individual reasons about dilemma → stage
More important than answer to dilemma
Moral Reasoning: Preconventional Stage
Punishment and self-interest
Preoperational stage
Morality = conformity for self-interest
Accept rules of authority figures
Judge actions by consequences
Moral Reasoning: Conventional Stage
Group norms and harmony
Concrete operational stage
Morality = conformity for greater good
Actively maintain social order
Ensure positive human relationships
Moral Reasoning: Postconventional Stage
Universal human rights and ethics
Formal operational stage
Morality = abstract principles and values
Question laws and rules of society
Seek values that apply across stations and societies
Moral Reasoning: Limitations of Kohlberg’s Theory
Most adults don’t reach postconventional stage
Cultures
Reasoning is not the same as behavior
Decisions involve emotions too
Emotion → judgment → reasoning when faced with dilemmas
Moral Evaluation in Infancy
“Mean puppet” and “nice puppet”
Infants prefer to play with “nice”
6 months
Depends on whether target of helping is similar or different from the infant
Snack preferences
Enemy of enemy = friend
Self-Concept
Concrete (physical and behavior) and usually positive
More about internal and relationships as children age
More realistic, integrated, abstract, and complex over time
Imaginary audience and personal fable
Self-Esteem
Genetics, relationships, attractiveness, academics, and social factors have influence
Differs cross-culturally
Ethnic and Racial Identity
Identify self as member of group
Understand group constancy
Ethnic-role behaviors
Learn about group
Belonging to group
Family and community have influence
Adolescent exploration
Diffused/foreclosed → search/moratorium
Some will embrace ethnicity/race, some will go towards majority, and some will be bicultural
S*xual Identity
Special difficulties for LGB children
Recognition → test and exploration → identity acceptance → identity integration
Stages can be nonlinear or nonexistent
Developing Self-Awareness: Enduring Self
Toddlerhood → preschool and elementary
Maturing of language skills allows children to develop autobiographical memories through conversations with parents
These memories reflect on self as having a life history
Developing Self-Awareness: Description of Self
Preschooler (4): physical, external
Elementary (9): cognitive, emotional, may compare self to others and be more realistic about abilities
Developing Self-Awareness: 3-5 Years
Observable characteristics
External factors
Overly positive
Typical emotions and attitudes
Developing Self-Awareness: 6-10 Years
Psychological characteristics and personality
Internal facts
Positive and negative
Social comparison
Self-Esteem
Judgments we make and feelings we have about our own worth
Whole self or parts of self
Developing Self-Esteem: Children’s Self-Esteem
Scholastic competence
Behavioral conduct
Athletic skills
Peer likability
Physical appearance
Developing Self-Esteem: Preschool (3-5)
Usually rate own ability very high
High self-esteem adaptive → intitiative
Developing Self-Esteem: Early Elementary School (6-7)
Decline due to social comparison
Balances out when children develop personal achievement goals
Promoting Realistic Self-Esteem: Increasing Self-Efficacy
Adult belief that child is capable
Effort statements > trait statements
Learning goals > performance goals
Important for both succeeding and non-succeeding children
Growth mindset → less likely to develop learned helplessness
Promoting Realistic Self-Esteem: Encouraging Accurate Perceptions
Accurate feedback
Caring feedback
Parents, teachers, coaches
Gender Cognition and Identity: Children’s Early Awareness
3 months: distinguish masculine and feminine faces
9-11 months: associate voices and faces
2-3 years: categorize unfamiliar children with gender labels
Stereotypical appearance cues
Gender Cognition and Identity: Stereotypes
Toy and activity preferences (2-3)
Girls like dolls, help mother, cook dinner, clean house (2-3)
Boys like cars, help father, build things (2-3)
But when asked “boys, girls, or both” children are a bit more flexible
3-5: saying both 55% of time
6-8: saying both 65% of time
Gender Cognition and Identity: Stereotyping in Play
Preschoolers associate everything (toys, clothes, jobs) with gender
Early childhood strengthens these beliefs
Don’t want friends who violate stereotypes
Don’t want to attend school where violations are allowed
Even children of intentional parents show this in early childhood
Rigid time, cognitive limitations
Broader cultural narratives
Gender Cognition and Identity: Gender Segregation in Play
Preschool: seek own gender
Boys = rough and tumble
Girls = verbal
Rooted in self-identification
Trans children will identify with own gender > birth gender
Gender Cognition and Identity: Why Gender is Important to Kids
Society tells them it’s important
Using labels every day
Gender Cognition and Identity: Functional Use In Classroom → Stereotyping?
Hillard and Liben
3-5 year-olds in lower salience school
“High salience condition” with verbal labels and physical dichotomies
“Low salience condition” with no verbal labels or physical dichotomies
Shift to increased stereotyping and preferences for high-salience
Gender Cognition and Identity: Gender Schema Theory
Children’s gendered behavior and expectations are influenced by schemas they have for “boy” and “girl”
Created based on particular society/culture child is brought up in
Will move onto interest filter if schema allows certain things
Identification > birth
Gender-schematic children emphasize gender as first filter
Gender aschematic children emphasize interests as first filter
Gender salience filter overall?
Identity Development in Adolescence and Beyond: Constructing an Identity
Identity vs role confusion
NOT identity crisis, more exploration
Marcia’s Identity Statuses: Identity Achievement
High commitment
High exploration
Marcia’s Identity Statuses: Identity Moratorium
Low commitment
High exploration
Marcia’s Identity Statuses: Identity Foreclosure
High commitment
Low exploration
Marcia’s Identity Statuses: Identity Diffusion
Low commitment
Low exploration
Identity Development in Adolescence and Beyond: Identity Status and Psychological Well-Being
Achievement and moratorium are healthy routes to mature self-definition
Long-term foreclosure and diffusion are maladaptive
Ruminative moratorium (anxiously obsessing about all possibilities) can also lead to high distress
Family Structure
Recently: parents are older, more single mothers, smaller families, more cohabitation, divorce, and remarriage
Adolescent mothers are more likely to be low-income and children are at risk
Better if mothers have parenting knowledge and if children have a warm relationship with father
No evidence for risk for children of same-sex parents
Hostile and dysfunctional interactions → negative outcomes for children of divorce
Remarriage can be positive or negative
Children do best when all parents are supportive
Family Dynamics
Socializing children through direct instruction, modeling, and managing experiences
Discipline emphasizing reasoning > punishments like spanking
Authoritative balances warmth and control → promotes social competence
Parenting styles and effects vary across cultures
Child characteristics influence parenting
Economic stress → undermines interaction qualities
Increases risks for children
Mothers interact with children more than fathers
Fathers do more physical play
Siblings learn from each other, support, and have conflict
Sibling relationships are most stable when parents treat equally and have good relationships with children
Child Maltreatment
Puts children at risk for cognitive delays, antisocial behavior, and mental health issues
Leads to long-term changes in brain structure and functioning
Neglect = most common form
Family Socioeconomic Context
Nonviolent > violent across cultures predicting better outcomes
Economic resources → parenting behaviors → child development
15% of children live below poverty line in US → at risk for cognitive and behavioral problems
Maternal employment has few negative effects if children are in quality, supervised care
US makes work choices hard due to lack of paid family leave
Childcare effects depend on child characteristics, relationship with mother, and care quality
Parenting Styles
The combination of parenting behaviors that occur over wide range of situations can be classified into 1 of 4 styles
Central Dimensions of Parenting: Nurturance
Acceptance
Sensitivity
Attention
Care
Love
Central Dimensions of Parenting: Discipline/Control
Expectations
Rules
Structure
Supervision
Appropriate autonomy
Parenting Styles: Authoritative
High nurturance
Very accepting, caring, loving
Positively attentive to child’s life
Appropriate discipline/control
Limits/rules are reasonable
Expectations clearly communicated
Parenting Styles: Authoritarian
Low nurturance
Cold
High expectations for what child should do and who they should be
High discipline/control
Strict limits/rules and are not negotiable
Heavy punishment/force when child does not comply
Parenting Styles: Permissive
High nurturance (but lack of emotional connection)
Accepting, caring, and loving
Minimal discipline/control
No limits on child behavior
Allows child complete freedom to make decisions
May think parenting = no limits set
May also have a lack of confidence in setting limits
Parenting Styles: Rejecting-Neglecting
Minimal or no nurturance
Inattentive to child
Lacking displays of love, care, or emotional support
No discipline/control
Child neglected and ignored
Left to raise themselves
Severe cases = child abuse
Parenting Style Outcomes (WEIRD): Authoritative
Independent
Creative
Self-assured
Socially skilled
Parenting Style Outcomes (WEIRD): Authoritarian
Dependent
Passive
Conforming
Parenting Style Outcomes (WEIRD): Permissive
Irresponsible
Conforming
Immature
Parenting Style Outcomes (WEIRD): Disengaged
Impulsive
Behavior problems
Early s*x and drugs
Parenting Style Outcomes (WEIRD): Culturally and Critiques
Likely different
Variations by culture, ethnicity, and SES
Different children may fit best with different parenting
Ex: More/less structure
Parents may use different styles when children are different ages
Each parent may adopt a different style
Parenting Style Outcomes (WEIRD): Agreements
Consistency = most important
Provide parenting that matches child’s needs
Goodness of fit
Provide parenting that matches societal conditions
Discipline: Corporal Punishment
Spanking
Positive punishment
Extreme: maltreatment/abuse
Low levels: can be beneficial and effective
Discipline: Psychological Control
Withdrawing signals of love
Negative punishment
Low levels > extreme
Discipline: Overall
Should be consistent so children know what to expect
Developmentally appropriate
Understanding what’s typical
Culturally appropriate
White American children don’t do well with corporal because it is often angry and responsive
Norm: less reactive for African Americans, calm yet stern and include conversation about why, often due to environments that are risky
Psychological control = norm in East Asia, effective
Childhood Maltreatment
Endangerment to child’s physical or emotional well-being
Physical abuse, neglect, emotional abuse, or sexual abuse
Destructive to young child in variety of ways
Internalizing vs externalizing problems
Mental health issues for parent and difficult quality of life → risks
Children who are difficult or slow-to-warm-up → risk
Different types of abuse have different effects on brain
Resilience: some children more or less affected
Changes to Family Systems
¼ of kids live with single parent
Increasing, harder for them
Moving away from traditional nuclear family (not necessary)
More blended families
Adoption
Homosexual parents
Grandparents raising children
Unmarried parents
Changes to Family Systems: Divorce
Global studies show children = more at risk for difficulties
Parental conflict/alienation is the most important factor
Alienation from one parents is extremely harmful
Parents need to regulate emotions and be respectful in co-parenting
Staying married can be harmful if there is high conflict
Teenage Push for Autonomy: Relations with Parents/Family
Most happy times = with family, though these are uncommon
Tension/conflict surrounding push for autonomy
Initial push: keeping secrets and being distant
Closeness decreases to 9th grade
Decreases slowly for boys after
But increases for girls after
Teenage Push for Autonomy: Cultural Similarities
Keeping some secrets
Feeling “in-between” child and adult
Some feelings of love/warmth for caregivers/family
Teenage Push for Autonomy: Cultural Differences
Not all had push for autonomy
Not all had emotional conflict
Play
Voluntary activities, motivation is enjoyment
Benefits many areas of development
Social play increases in complexity with age
Basis for mental health and trauma interventions
Friendships
Peers often similar in age, sex, race, and behavior
Matters less with age
Even young children prefer some friends > others
Preschoolers have more complex and cooperative play but also more conflict with friends
Young children = more about activities
Older children = more about trust and understanding
Self-discipline and intimacy
Internet and social media → lead to more friends, anonymity and feelings of control
Friends → positive development, but not when they engage in negative behaviors
Time with unrelated peers varies across cultures
Peer group ←→ risky behaviors
Bullying is common, bullies have power and status while victims struggle
Status in the Peer Group
Varies based on social behavior and thinking, attractiveness
Can change over time
Popular = high in social skills, regulation, and aggression
Rejected = aggressive or withdrawn
Neglected = less sociable, less aggressive, and less disrupted
Not noticed
Controversial = characteristics of both popular and rejected
Similar across cultures but used to be more valued to be quieter in East Asia
Parents’ Role in Children’s Peer Relationships
Secure attachment → positive behavior and social skills → more liked
Bidirectional between parents and child
Positive relationship with parent(s) can be a buffer against negative effects of peer relationships
Peer Acceptance
The extent to which a child is viewed by a group of same-age children as a worthy social partner
Popular children
Rejected children
Relational aggression and popularity are positively correlated, especially for girls
Popular Children
Do better in school
Prosocial
Kids may want to copy / be like them
Children assume a link to wealth
Think they’re mean
Rejected Children: Socially Aggressive
More likely to be aggressive physically
More often boys
Stay stuck in rejection
May have hostile attribution
Rejected Children: Socially Withdrawn
May have social anxiety / lack of confidence
May not make effort to reach out
Could be awkward or seem different
Passive, expecting negative treatment
Self-fulfilling prophecy
Tend to be bullied
Bullying Causes / How to Stop
More likely to happen if peer group allows it
Bystanders need to not accept bully
Consequences for Victims of Bullying
Anxiety, depression, poor self-concept
Loneliness and powerlessness → can lead to s*idcidal thoughts
Absenteeism → academic decline
Cyberbullying
Less research
Schools may decide it’s not their problem
Larger audience
Anonymity
No immediate consequence
Friendship: With Bullying
Children need one good friend
Can be a protective factor
Friendship: Development
Young children: playing together
Even once, very open
Elementary/Middle School: trust
Not obligated like family, choice
Friendship: Benefits
Protection from home and school issues
Enhance happiness
Practice managing emotions and handling conflicts