WWII Paper 3 Info for Finals

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/16

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 12:58 AM on 6/15/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

17 Terms

1
New cards

impact on women and minorities

Thesis: Although women minorities were able to rejoin the workforce and establish their place in American society, both groups faced opposition to their new roles and lives, causing a negative impact that stunted their newfound growth

BTs:

1) Due to high numbers of men going off to war, women and minority groups were able to obtain jobs they had been pushed out of previously, consequently leading to them refining their position in American society.

  • Emma Petcher received a job at Brookely Fields where she learning about airplane accessories so she couldn't help repair military airplanes.

    • she was able to get this job as the men who usually did this were gone off at war

  • Braceros program: opening up temp migration from Mexico to allow Mexican workers to make up for larger worker shortage due to war.

    • years earlier, many mexicans had been deported due tp lack of opportunities and high job competition sparked by GD

    • this program caused business who wanted the workers ro provide good housing and medical care > govern able to raise standard go living for Braceros program workers> consequently strengthening their place in american society

2) Despite the oppurtunties women gained due to WII, women had to deal with immense emotional burden along with pushback from the media, consequently resulting in a negative impact that overshadowed growth.

  • Emma Petcher remembers how other women she lived with in the YWCA in Mobile went put with soldiers only to become immensest frustrated after they became pregnant and had no support from the man their had intercourse with (emotional toll)

    • limitation: not all women were able to interact with soldiers due to their location in the country

    • strength: sheds light on emotional hardships due to cause of men going off to war > overshadows oppurtunities women gained as this was a more universal experience

  • magazines and journals focused on how many children were left in government funded centers and daycares. Media went as fa as to dub the kids as “8 hour orphans” > achievements of women overlooked as media that america consumed portrayed women as poor mothers

3) Similar to women, minorities were able to receive new opportunities due to WII, racism in a widespread scale harmed them immensely, consequently resulting in the overshadowing of their progress as well.

  • japanese internent staring as a result of WII

    • camps in poor conditions > Toku Machida Shimomura wrote in a journal that described the condition Minidoka in Idaho

    • described how her blood pressure read 185/100 in the camp. the reading in severe and calls for immediate and quality medical help as the risk of life threatening complications (did not have access rot this at Minidoka)

    • also depicts horrible conditions of the sick rooms. Rogeer, a boy in the isolation ward for sick people due to contracting chicken pox dealt with temp reaching 120 degrees

2
New cards

Treatment of Japanese Americans, Japanese Latin Americans and Japanese Canadians

Thesis:

The internment of Japanese Americans during WII created severe physical and psychological harm because the U.S. government forced relocation into poorly designed camps where inadequate medical care, overcrowding, and extreme living conditions endangered the health and wellbeing of internees.

The internment of Japanese Americans

During WWII, governments in the Americas forcibly removed and detained people of Japanese descent, and exposed internees to harsh living conditions, inadequate medical care, and systemic neglect that severely harmed physical and social wellbeing.

BTs:

In the United States, the incarceration of Japanese Americans in camps such as Minidoka National Historic Site created severe health crises and medical neglect, as overcrowded and under-resourced facilities failed to provide adequate treatment for serious illnesses, leaving internees exposed to life-threatening conditions.

  • Toku Machida Shimomura recorded a blood pressure reading of 185/100, showing a severe hypertensive crisis requiring urgent medical intervention

  • Internee accounts describe no access to proper emergency or specialist medical care

  • Isolation ward conditions included temperatures reported up to 120°F, worsening illness and recovery

  • A child in isolation suffered from chickenpox in extreme heat with poor ventilation

  • Camp infirmaries were overcrowded and understaffed, delaying or limiting treatment

In Canada, Japanese Canadians—primarily concentrated in British Columbia—were forcibly uprooted from their homes and subjected to state-sanctioned dispossession and confinement, where the destruction of property, forced relocation with minimal notice, and inadequate camp infrastructure demonstrated a systematic violation of civil rights driven by wartime fear and racial prejudice.

  • On 4 March 1942, Japanese Canadians were given 24 hours’ notice to evacuate the coast of British Columbia

  • Approximately 22,000 Japanese Canadians were forcibly removed

  • The government confiscated fishing boats, homes, and businesses

  • Confiscated property was sold below market value, often without owner consent

  • Families were housed in tents or poorly insulated wooden shacks unsuitable for Canadian winters

  • Internees were forced to share stoves and basic facilities due to overcrowding

In Latin America, particularly in countries such as Peru and Brazil, Japanese communities were targeted through coordinated wartime policies influenced by the United States, resulting in mass arrests, deportations, and the transfer of civilians to internment camps in North America, where they were treated as security threats despite a lack of evidence of espionage or sabotage.

  • Around 2,300 Japanese Latin Americans were arrested across 13 countries during WWII

  • Approximately 1,800 Japanese Peruvians were deported to the United States

  • Many were held in U.S. camps such as Crystal City Internment Camp (Texas)

  • Two major prisoner exchange operations (1942–1943) transferred over 800 Japanese Latin Americans to Japan

  • About 900 individuals were deported to Japan after the war when home countries refused repatriation

  • Peru had a pre-war Japanese population of approximately 26,000 people, one of the largest in Latin America

3
New cards

Reasons for involvement of any two countries of the Americas in the Second World War

Thesis:

Canada and Mexico entered and participated in the Second World War primarily because of their political and economic alignment with the Allied powers, especially the United States and Britain, but while Canada became deeply involved due to its status as a British Dominion committed to direct military support in Europe, Mexico’s involvement was more limited and driven mainly by regional security concerns and economic dependence on the United States.

BTs:

Canada’s involvement in World War II was driven largely by its constitutional ties to Britain and its commitment to supporting the British Empire militarily, which led to full-scale participation in global combat operations.

Specific evidence:

  • Canada declared war in 1939 alongside Britain, reflecting its status as a self-governing Dominion still closely tied to the British Empire.

  • Over 1 million Canadians served in the military out of a population of about 12 million.

  • Canada played a major role in key British-linked operations such as the Battle of the Atlantic, protecting supply convoys to Britain.

  • Canadian forces participated in major British-led campaigns including Dieppe (1942), Italy (1943–45), and Normandy (D-Day, 1944).

  • The British Commonwealth Air Training Plan made Canada a central training hub for Allied airmen, showing its direct imperial military contribution.

Mexico entered World War II mainly due to growing economic and political alignment with the United States and concerns over regional security in the Western Hemisphere, rather than direct military obligation in Europe.

Specific evidence:

  • Mexico initially remained neutral but moved toward cooperation with the U.S. through hemispheric solidarity agreements in the 1930s and early 1940s.

  • The U.S. and Mexico signed agreements in April 1941 for mutual defense and cooperation, including U.S. use of Mexican air bases and pilot training.

  • Mexico expelled German diplomatic agents in August 1941, signaling alignment with the Allies.

  • Mexico declared war after German submarine attacks on its oil tankers, including the sinking of the Potrero del Llano in May 1942.

  • Mexico’s military participation was limited, with the main contribution being Escuadrón 201 (Aztec Eagles), which served in the Philippines in 1945, while most involvement was economic support and resource supply to the U.S.

4
New cards

Results of involvement of any two countries of the Americas in the Second World War

Canada’s and Mexico’s involvement in the Second World War produced major long-term political, economic, and social transformations, but while Canada emerged as a strengthened industrial and military “middle power” with expanded global influence and a reinforced national identity, Mexico experienced accelerated industrialization and closer integration with the United States, alongside significant economic side effects such as inflation and corruption.

Canada’s participation in WWII fundamentally transformed it from a relatively limited military power into a major Allied contributor with a modern industrial economy, expanded armed forces, and a stronger sense of national identity and international influence.

  • Canada’s wartime economy expanded dramatically, with government spending rising from $118 million in 1939 to $4.6 billion in 1945, reflecting a massive shift toward wartime industrial production and state-controlled mobilization.

  • The war ended the effects of the Great Depression, as Canada reached full employment by 1942, showing how military production revitalized the economy and workforce.

  • Canada developed one of the most powerful Allied militaries outside the major superpowers, expanding its navy from 6 destroyers to 471 warships and over 100,000 sailors, making it essential to Atlantic naval operations.

  • Canadian forces played a critical role in key Allied campaigns, including the Battle of the Atlantic (protecting supply routes to Britain), Dieppe (1942), the Italian Campaign (1943–45), and D-Day at Normandy (1944), where Canadians landed on Juno Beach and advanced further inland than other Allied forces on the first day.

  • Canada’s military contribution also extended into air operations through the British Commonwealth Air Training Plan, which trained thousands of Allied pilots and reinforced Canada’s strategic importance within the Allied war effort.

  • The shared wartime experience helped unify the country politically and socially, as soldiers from different linguistic and regional backgrounds fought together, strengthening Canadian nationalism despite tensions such as the conscription crisis.

Mexico’s involvement in WWII was primarily driven by security concerns and economic alignment with the United States, and while it led to industrial growth and stronger international cooperation, it also deepened economic dependence on the U.S. and contributed to domestic issues such as inflation, corruption, and social strain.

  • Mexico initially maintained neutrality but gradually aligned with the Allies through hemispheric solidarity policies with the United States, including a 1941 mutual defense agreement that allowed the U.S. access to Mexican air bases and supported pilot training cooperation.

  • Mexico strengthened political ties with the United States through economic agreements, including the sale of strategic minerals, a $40 million loan, and guaranteed U.S. purchases of Mexican silver, tying Mexico more closely to the American wartime economy.

  • Mexico formally entered the war after direct Axis aggression, especially the sinking of Mexican oil tankers such as the Potrero del Llano in May 1942, which pushed public opinion and the government toward declaring war on the Axis powers.

  • Mexico’s military involvement remained limited but symbolically important, particularly through Escuadrón 201 (Aztec Eagles), a 300-man air squadron trained in the U.S. that fought in the Philippines in 1945, participating in combat missions in Luzon and Formosa.

  • The war encouraged industrialization and infrastructure development, including improvements in highways, ports, agriculture, and military capacity, marking a shift toward a more modernized economy.

  • However, rapid wartime growth also created negative consequences, including rising inflation and increased corruption, as government spending and contracts expanded quickly.

  • Mexico also became more economically dependent on the United States after the war, as wartime trade patterns reinforced long-term reliance on U.S. markets and investment.

5
New cards

Diplomatic effects of the Second World War in ONE country

WWII changed United States diplomacy by moving it away from isolationist framework toward a more interventionist foreign policy, in which wartime security demands and postwar planning reshaped the Americas as a cooperative unit under US leadership, consequently setting the groundwork for a shift to superpower dominated diplomatics.

WWII pushed the United States to redefine Latin America as a strategic security zone rather than an area of strict non-intervention, expanding military and intelligence cooperation in ways that significantly undermined the Good Neighbor principle and established the precedent that US security concerns could override earlier diplomatic commitments.

  • By 1939–41, the US shifted from strict Good Neighbor non-intervention to active hemispheric security planning, coordinating defence strategy across the Americas in response to Axis expansion in the Atlantic and Pacific.

  • The creation of the Office of the Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs (OCIAA) in 1940, led by Nelson Rockefeller, institutionalised US influence by managing propaganda, intelligence sharing, and cultural diplomacy across Latin America to counter Axis influence.

  • The US expanded Pan-American military coordination agreements, allowing the construction and use of strategic airbases and naval facilities in countries such as Brazil and across the Caribbean, strengthening US control over key Atlantic routes.

  • After Pearl Harbor in 1941, the US used diplomatic pressure through the Pan-American system to push Latin American governments to sever relations with Germany, Italy, and Japan, with most states complying by 1942 (except initial holdouts like Argentina).

  • US hemispheric diplomacy increasingly framed neutrality as unacceptable, effectively redefining the Western Hemisphere as a collective defence zone under US leadership rather than a group of independent neutral states.


WWII transformed hemispheric relations by replacing informal cooperation with US-led diplomatic agreements aimed at collective defence, consequently integrating US leadership into significant inter-American structures

  • The US helped formalise wartime hemispheric diplomacy through conferences such as the Havana Conference (1940), where American states agreed that European colonies in the Americas could be placed under collective protection if threatened, expanding the idea of joint hemispheric security.

  • At the Pan-American conferences during WWII, the US pushed for unified diplomatic positions, leading to most Latin American states aligning with US policy by breaking relations with the Axis powers after 1941, turning cooperation into near-continental consensus.

  • The Act of Chapultepec (1945) established the principle that an attack on one American state would be treated as an attack on all, marking a major step toward formal collective security in the hemisphere.

  • These wartime agreements directly laid the groundwork for postwar institutions such as the Rio Treaty (1947) and the Organization of American States (OAS, 1948), institutionalising US-led diplomacy beyond WWII.

  • US leadership in these frameworks meant that diplomatic coordination was no longer ad hoc but embedded in permanent multilateral institutions dominated by Washington.


WWII deepened US economic diplomacy by integrating Latin American economies into wartime trade and resource networks, causing an increase in dependency on US markets and reinforcing American dominance in the postwar regional economic order.

  • During WWII, the US dramatically expanded imports of strategic raw materials from Latin America, including oil, copper, tin, and rubber, integrating the region into the US war production system.

  • Through programs like Lend-Lease (extended to Latin America in wartime form), the US provided loans, equipment, and infrastructure support to ensure political alignment and secure access to essential resources.

  • The Export-Import Bank played a major role in financing transport, mining, and agricultural development projects tied directly to wartime supply chains, increasing US financial influence in the region.

  • Countries such as Brazil became key military and economic partners, supplying materials and joining the Allied war effort with the Brazilian Expeditionary Force (1944), showing how economic ties translated into military cooperation.

  • By the end of WWII, Latin American economies were increasingly structured around US markets and dollar-based trade networks, reinforcing long-term dependency that extended into the postwar period.

6
New cards

Reactions to the events in Europe and Asia

Thesis: Although most countries in the Americas initially focused on attempting to remain neutral in foreign conflicts, the rise Axis Power aggression during the 1930s gradually drew them into global affairs, revealing the limits of isolationism regarding foreign policy.

The Japanese invasion of Manchuria demonstrated that countries in the Americas could not remain completely detached from international conflicts due to becaming involved in diplomatic efforts despite their reluctance to take direct action, highlighting how isolationism was not always feasible

  • In 1931 Japan invaded Manchuria after using an explosion on the South Manchurian Railway as a pretext for military occupation.

  • The United States immediately condemned the invasion and refused to recognize Japanese control of Manchuria.

  • Although not a member of the League of Nations, the United States appointed General Frank McCoy to serve on the League's Lytton Commission.

  • The Lytton Commission concluded that Japan was guilty of aggression.

  • Canada participated in League discussions and struggled to balance British and American positions regarding Japan.

  • The crisis showed that nations in the Americas were already becoming involved in international disputes even while claiming neutrality.

The failure of collective security during the Italian invasion of Ethiopia exposed divisions within the Americas and highlighted the weakness of neutral policies when confronting aggressive dictatorships.

  • When Italy invaded Ethiopia in 1935, President Roosevelt applied the Neutrality Act and banned arms sales to both countries.

  • This policy effectively treated the aggressor and the victim equally.

  • Canada was deeply divided over how to respond to the invasion.

  • Canadian representative Walter Riddell supported sanctions against Italy, while the government in Ottawa preferred a more cautious approach.

  • The inability of the League of Nations to effectively punish Italy further weakened international cooperation.

  • The crisis demonstrated that neutrality often failed to stop aggression and encouraged authoritarian states to continue expanding.

The growing threats posed by Nazi Germany and the outbreak of World War II pushed the United States and Canada toward greater international engagement, ultimately proving that isolationism could not protect the Americas from global conflict.

  • Reactions to Adolf Hitler were mixed throughout the Americas, but Roosevelt was increasingly concerned about Nazi racial policies and militarism.

  • Roosevelt opposed German expansion and criticized Hitler's actions in Europe.

  • In 1938 Roosevelt publicly stated that the United States would help defend Canada if its security were threatened.

  • The failure of appeasement became clear when Germany occupied the rest of Czechoslovakia in 1939 after the Munich Agreement.

  • Roosevelt sent a telegram warning Hitler against further aggression.

  • After Germany invaded Poland on September 1, 1939, Britain and France declared war.

  • Canada quickly entered the war against Germany, while the United States moved steadily away from strict neutrality.

  • These events demonstrated that the Americas could no longer avoid involvement in world affairs.

7
New cards

Cooperation and neutrality

Thesis:

World War II steadily dismantled neutrality across the Americas as escalating global conflict and Axis aggression pushed governments toward deeper cooperation that consequently integrated the Western Hemisphere into the Allied war effort

While the United States officially maintained neutrality in the early years of WWII, Roosevelt increasingly weakened that stance by introducing policies that tied America to the success of the Allied powers, making cooperation with them strong before actually entering the war.

  • Neutrality Acts attempted to keep the USA out of foreign conflicts.

  • 1939 "Cash and Carry" policy allowed Britain and France to buy American weapons if they paid cash and transported them themselves.

  • Roosevelt requested $1 billion for defense spending and expanded the navy.

  • 1940 Selective Service Act established the first peacetime military draft in U.S. history.

  • March 1941 Lend-Lease Act provided approximately $7 billion initially and eventually $50 billion in aid to Britain, the Soviet Union, China, and France.

  • August 1941 Atlantic Charter committed the USA and Britain to common war aims before the USA officially entered the war.


The countries in Latin America increasingly cooperated with the United States as wartime pressures and shared concerns about Axis influence encouraged closer coordination, leading to policies that aligned their governments more closely with U.S, diminishing the concept of neutrality

  • The Pan-American Union promoted hemispheric solidarity against Axis influence.

  • After the fall of France and the Netherlands, American republics agreed that French and Dutch colonies in the Americas would not become Axis possessions.

  • The Office of the Coordinator of Inter-American Affairs (CIAA) was created in 1940 to strengthen inter-American relations and combat Axis propaganda and espionage.

  • The USA purchased strategic raw materials from Latin America, including Chilean copper, Mexican oil, Peruvian cotton, Bolivian and Venezuelan petroleum, and Colombian platinum.

  • Military cooperation expanded through U.S. air bases in Natal, Brazil, and military aid to Brazil, Panama, Cuba, Mexico, Colombia, Ecuador, and the Dominican Republic.

  • The Hyde Park Declaration coordinated Canadian and American production for Lend-Lease assistance to Britain.


After Pearl Harbor, neutrality collapsed across the Americas as the attack on the United States caused a coordinated regional response, leading to many countries to align themselves with the Allies and directly support the war effort against the Axis powers

  • Japan attacked Pearl Harbor on 7 December 1941, leading the USA to declare war on 8 December.

  • Germany and Italy declared war on the USA on 11 December 1941.

  • All Central American and Caribbean nations quickly declared war on the Axis.

  • At the 1942 Rio Conference, most American nations agreed to sever relations with the Axis powers.

  • Mexico declared war in May 1942 after German submarine attacks on its ships.

  • Brazil declared war on 22 August 1942 after German U-boats sank 18 Brazilian ships.

  • Brazil sent more than 25,000 troops to fight in Italy and participated in the Battle of the Atlantic.

  • Chile severed ties with the Axis in 1943 and declared war in February 1945.

  • Argentina, the strongest defender of neutrality, finally declared war on the Axis in March 1945.

8
New cards

Women in GD

while women challenged prior notions regarding gender during the GD, the shift away from men led caused a rise in prejudice against women in workplace and neglect of women of color, consequently leaving any progress overshadowed

BT1:

BT2:

BT3:

9
New cards

Minorities in GD

while minorities in America were able to establish a sense of culture and identity during the GD, heightened racism from the dire living situation caused minority groups across the country to be ostracized

BT1:

BT2:
BT3:

10
New cards

A&E

During the Great Depression, many women became the ones working, and in response to this, films begun to reiterate gender norms and emphasis and man’s place over a women through their characters, diminishing any progress made for women

BT1:

BT2:
BT3:

11
New cards

political and economic causes for GD in Americas

12
New cards

Critics of the New Deal

13
New cards

mpact of the New Deal on US political and economic systems

14
New cards

political instability and challenges to democracy of GD on LAC

15
New cards

economic and social challenges of GD on LAC

16
New cards

Latin American responses to the Great Depression

17
New cards

Nature and Efficacy of Solutions to GD

Although the federal response to the Great Depression was a significant expansion of government involvement in the economy, it caused a stabilization and preservation of American capitalism rather than economic adaptability, limiting the country’s ability to achieve a full economic recovery.

While Hoover and Roosevelt expanded federal intervention to help the public, their measures caused a restoration in confidence in existing capitalist institutions rather than replace them, demonstrating the fundamentally conservative nature of federal recovery efforts.

Despite government programs provided stabilization, policymakers continued to be constrained by a commitment to fiscal responsibility and balanced budgets, preventing federal intervention from reaching the scale necessary to generate sustained recovery.

Though federal initiatives mitigated some of the Depression's most severe social and economic consequences, they failed to address the underlying structural weaknesses of the American economy, causing full recovery to be dependent on the economic mobilization of World War II.