1/29
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Need to belong
Optimal wellbeing requires close positive relationships
Fundamental and universal need
Had evolutionary benefits for survival and reproduction
Groups share resources and care for offspring
Help protect against large animals
Close relationships are associated with
overall greater life satisfaction
Longer lifespan
Better health
Loneliness (definition)
Discrepancy between the level of contact with others one has and the level one desires
often occurs during transitions, may be relative
Associated with worse life quality and suicidal ideation
4 main factors that predict initial attraction
proximity
Mere exposure effect
Similarity
Age, health, physical similarity
Easier to talk to people
Reciprocity
We like ppl who like us
Physical attractiveness
Attractive ppl tend to be more socially skilled
May relate to perception of health and fertility
Which factor plays the biggest indicator of attraction
reciprocity
Mere exposure effect
We like things more when we see them more
Matching hypothesis
we tend to end up with others whose attractiveness level (or desirability level) is simaler to our own
What is beautiful is good effect/Halo effect
if we see an attractive person we tend to attribute positive traits to them
Shacters Two factor theory of emotion
we feel things in our body and the we assign an emotional/cogntive value to it
Ppl can be mistaken inferences about what is causing them to feel the way they do
Ppl can misattribute physical excitation in environment for attraction
Why does the passion fade in long term relationships
We start to feel relaxed around ppl, relaxation and arousal are opposite ends of the spectrum
Do weird new stuff together
Implicit Theories of Relationships
Destiny/soulmate beliefs
Growth/work it out beliefs
Evolutionary Theory of Close Relationships
Passing on our genes is only goal of relationship
tools like makeup are used to enhance traits that are genetically profitable
What does Evo Theory of Close Relationshops say about sex differences in mate selection
women seek resources
Men seek physical investment
Men are more likely to be upset by sexual infidelity (paternal uncertainty)
Women by emotional infidelity (loss of resources)
Attachment style
How a person typically interacts with significant others, as guided byy models developed based on early experience with primary caregiver
Bowlby's Attachment Theory
evolution has ‘wired’ humans to seek closeness and thereby emotional security
Types of attachment styles
Secure attachment = happy and trusting in relationships, stable, stay in relationships longer (cry when mom leaves, stop crying when mom comes back)
Anxious attachment = fearful of rejection, negative self worth, obsession and desire for union (keep crying when mom comes back)
Avoidant attachment = fear of intimacy, low desire for closeness, less trusting of partner (wont be too upset)
Can attachment styles vary over time
Yes
Investment model
how satisfied we are in a relationship is a function of costs and rewards of that relationship
might feel that ur relationship is better if others around you have worse relationships
Satisfaction effects commitment and investment levels in relationship
How do ppl in relationships handle attractive alternatives
maintenance responses = bc ppl are motivated to maintain relationship so they dampen threat of attractive temptation
devalue them
Pay less attention
Mentioned partner more often
Idealization
ppl in committed relationships tend to idealize partners
faults become virtues
Make partner more positive in their eyes
Motivated inaccuracy
instances where couples are motivated to be less accurate about their partners thoughts and feelings
can be beneficial
related to lower relationship closeness
4 hoursemen of breaking up
criticism = complaining abt partner in a way that attacks them
defensiveness = défense from real or perceived criticism, no responsibility
contempt = mockery, sarcasm, hostile humour
stonewalling = actively disengaging from a conversation by looking away, not responding to questions
can predict likelihood of diverse over 14 years with 93% accuracy
Does relationship satisfaction tend to increase or decrease over time
Decrease
Positive illusions and longevity
For ppl w low idealization of partner, ppl tend to break up sooner
see their partner as more distance from their ideal
Finkel’s Marriage Suffocation Model
fundamental purpose of marriage has changed over time, our expectations of marriage have grown
Used to be mostly political and economic
Feelings of suffocation develop when expectations are not being met
There are lots of expectations about helping partner meet personal growth needs
Maybe bc ppl have less friends outside of relationships now
Reoxygenating the marriage
get some expectations of partner met outside
Do new things together
Investing more resources relationships
spend more time together
do activism together
What factors make divorce more likely
First marriages have lower divorce rates than second and thirds
Divorce is more common in places with greater socioeconomic developments and gender equality
people are more likely to divorce if they work in a sector with lots of opposite sex ppl
Fear of being single
some ppl rly dont like the idea of being alone
associated with settling for less in romantic relationship
less likely to initiate dissolution of a less satisfying relationship
Avoidance goals
motivation to maintain social connections by avoiding conflict or disagreement
tend to be more happy in a relationship
Approach goals
try to maintain social relationships by enhancing intimacy and fostering relationship growth