1/23
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
company/stock-specific factors
factors characterizing the firm/stock of the firm
private company specific factors (7) (IN GENERAL)
stage: early w/ minimal capital/assets/employees
size: smaller w/ higher risk premium/lower growth opportunities
SH/management: overlapping
quality/depth of management: less attractive to management candidates
financial info quality: less required, higher burden for prospective investors
investor pressure: less pressure, can focus on LR investment
taxes: more important
private company stock specific factors (3) (IN GENERAL)
liquidity: less liquid (less SHs, not publicly registered)
capital concentration: less SHs
share restrictions: potential agreements prevent SHs from selling
key takeaway from private firms company/stock specific factors
generally, stock-specific factors are a negative for private firms and company-specific factors can be negative or positive
3 purposes of private valuation
transaction related
compliance related
litigation related
transaction related
events affect firm ownership/financing
types of compliance related purposes
financial reporting
tax reporting
3 private valuation approaches
income approach
market approach
asset-based approach
income approach
values asset as the PV of income expected from it
3 forms of the income method
FCF method
CCM method
EEM method
FCF method
values asset based on PV of future CF estimates
capitalization CF method (CCM)
values by using a single representative estimate of economic benefits divided by capitalization rate
Vf = FCFF/(WACC-g)
Ve = FCFE/(r-g)
stable growth, single-stage FCF used for smaller private firms w/ low growth prospects
capitalization rate
r-g
excess earnings method (EEM)
estimates value of all intangibles by capitalizing future earnings in excess of estimated return requirements associated w/ WC and fixed assets
used for small private companies w/ significant unrecognized intangibles
size premium
premium added for smaller market cap firms
CAPM for private firms
same but ß is based on market data of public comps
expanded CAPM
r = CAPM + prem(small size) + prem(company-specific risk)
Build up approach
r = E(Rf) + E(Rm-Rf) + prem(industry risk) + prem(small size) + prem(company-specific risk)
ß assumed to be 1
used when public comps are questionable
market approach
values asset based on pricing multiples from sales of comps
asset-based approach
values firm based on values of underlying assets of the entity less the value of related liabilities
rarely used for GC firms
what approach to choose for private firm valuation
based on life cycle stage
early: asset-based
hard to predict FCF
GC uncertain
mature/stable: market approach
high-growth development: income approach
ex. disruptive firms (ex. uber) have no comps
diversification/conglomerate discount
a diversified firm (MS) on avg has a lower market valuation than an equivalent collection of focused firms (SS)
measuring conglomerate discount
q ratio = MV of total A/BV of total A
compare actual q against q of synthetic benchmark firm constructed w/ matched SS firms
discount exists if actual q < imputed q
excess value
log(actual q/imputed q)
discount: xv < 0
no dis/prem: xv = 0
premium: xv > 0