1/6
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Aim
To see if participants would feel pressured into conforming to an obviously wrong answer
Procedure
Participants were asked to match 1 standard line to 3 possibilities
Control study - 36 participants taking part in 20 trials each, only 3 mistakes made over 720 trials
Experiment study - 50 male college students tested in groups of 7,8 or 9. All members of group were confederates which gave wrong answer on certain critical trials (12/18).
Participant was always last or 2nd to last to guess
Findings
32% basic conformity rate
5% conformed on every critical trial
74% conformed at least once
26% didn’t conform at all
Conclusions
NSI - participants only conforming so they don’t look different means they didn’t internalise answer & would return to original belief
AO3 No 1 - useful applications
Useful applications
Public voting may be affected by NSI & it may be better to vote privately
Taken on board by trade unions who no longer ask for show of hands when voting
Instead now use private ballots, showing that knowledge of NSI has improved democratic process
AO3 No 2 - Culture bias
Culture bias
Smith & Bond analysed 100+ studies like Asch’s & found collectivist cultures more likely to conform than individualist cultures.
Asch’s research was done on individualist culture so less conformity is expected however in a collectivist culture more conformity is expected due to emphasis on inter-dependance
Asch’s results don’t generalise to non-western cultures or collectivist sub-cultures in western society
AO3 No 3 - Mundane realism
Lacks mundane realism
Judging length of a line is meaningless to participants & not an emotive issue
However people may not conform in a real life situation which may involve compromise of their values, for example laughing at an offensive joke.
Meaning someone may be less likely to conform in real life & that Asch may have overestimated conformity, so his results aren’t very generalisable