1/11
Flashcards covering key vocabulary, concepts, and landmark Supreme Court cases related to a defendant's competence to waive the right to counsel and represent themselves.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Sixth Amendment
A fundamental right in the justice system that guarantees a defendant's right to counsel and protects their choice to represent themselves.
Decisional Competence
The ability to make a specific decision with an understanding of its consequences, crucial for evaluating competence to waive counsel.
Parens Patriae
Latin for 'state as parent,' referring to the state's authority to intervene when a person cannot care for themselves.
Pro Se
A legal term meaning to represent oneself in court without the assistance of a lawyer.
Mental Health Red Flags (in self-representation)
Indicators such as a defeatist attitude, paranoid ideation, fantastic objectives, or irrational beliefs that may suggest a defendant is not competent to waive counsel.
Faretta v. California (1975)
A landmark Supreme Court case that recognized a defendant's Sixth Amendment constitutional right to represent themselves in their own criminal trial, emphasizing autonomy.
Autonomy (in self-representation)
The principle, highlighted in Faretta v. California, that an individual should be free to choose their defense, even if that choice is unwise or harms their chances of a fair trial.
Godinez v. Moran (1993)
A Supreme Court case that ruled the standard for competence to waive counsel is no different from the standard for competence to stand trial, requiring a knowing and voluntary waiver.
Competence to Choose vs. Competence to Perform
A distinction clarified in Godinez v. Moran, where the focus for waiving counsel is on a defendant's understanding of the decision, not their ability to effectively perform trial tasks.
Indiana v. Edwards (2008)
A Supreme Court case that added a limitation, holding that competence to stand trial does not automatically mean competence to self-represent, especially for defendants with severe mental illness who may lack the ability to carry out trial demands.
Second Layer of Competence
A concept introduced by Indiana v. Edwards, suggesting that a defendant needs not only competence to make the decision to self-represent but also competence to carry out the actual demands of a trial.
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
A landmark Supreme Court case that established the right to court-appointed counsel for indigent defendants who cannot afford a lawyer.