Competence to Waive Right to Counsel and Self-Representation

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/11

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Flashcards covering key vocabulary, concepts, and landmark Supreme Court cases related to a defendant's competence to waive the right to counsel and represent themselves.

Last updated 8:17 PM on 9/20/25
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

12 Terms

1
New cards

Sixth Amendment

A fundamental right in the justice system that guarantees a defendant's right to counsel and protects their choice to represent themselves.

2
New cards

Decisional Competence

The ability to make a specific decision with an understanding of its consequences, crucial for evaluating competence to waive counsel.

3
New cards

Parens Patriae

Latin for 'state as parent,' referring to the state's authority to intervene when a person cannot care for themselves.

4
New cards

Pro Se

A legal term meaning to represent oneself in court without the assistance of a lawyer.

5
New cards

Mental Health Red Flags (in self-representation)

Indicators such as a defeatist attitude, paranoid ideation, fantastic objectives, or irrational beliefs that may suggest a defendant is not competent to waive counsel.

6
New cards

Faretta v. California (1975)

A landmark Supreme Court case that recognized a defendant's Sixth Amendment constitutional right to represent themselves in their own criminal trial, emphasizing autonomy.

7
New cards

Autonomy (in self-representation)

The principle, highlighted in Faretta v. California, that an individual should be free to choose their defense, even if that choice is unwise or harms their chances of a fair trial.

8
New cards

Godinez v. Moran (1993)

A Supreme Court case that ruled the standard for competence to waive counsel is no different from the standard for competence to stand trial, requiring a knowing and voluntary waiver.

9
New cards

Competence to Choose vs. Competence to Perform

A distinction clarified in Godinez v. Moran, where the focus for waiving counsel is on a defendant's understanding of the decision, not their ability to effectively perform trial tasks.

10
New cards

Indiana v. Edwards (2008)

A Supreme Court case that added a limitation, holding that competence to stand trial does not automatically mean competence to self-represent, especially for defendants with severe mental illness who may lack the ability to carry out trial demands.

11
New cards

Second Layer of Competence

A concept introduced by Indiana v. Edwards, suggesting that a defendant needs not only competence to make the decision to self-represent but also competence to carry out the actual demands of a trial.

12
New cards

Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)

A landmark Supreme Court case that established the right to court-appointed counsel for indigent defendants who cannot afford a lawyer.