Quantitative Research Final

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/63

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 7:50 PM on 5/11/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

64 Terms

1
New cards

random assignment

ensures that each participant has an equal chance of being placed in a condition

2
New cards

random sample

ensures that each member of the population has an equal chance of being chosen for a study

3
New cards

are random sampling and random assignment the same thing?

No, if you don’t have random sample, you can use random sampling to still be considered a simple random sample

4
New cards

validity

concerned with accuracy, how well researchers measure what they intend to measure… is argued for conceptually

5
New cards

reliability

concerned with consistency, measuring something in a consistent and stable manner… is assessed numerically

6
New cards

internal validity

accuracy of conclusions drawn from a particular study

7
New cards

external validity

the generalizability of the findings from a research study

8
New cards

one tailed hypothesis

predicts a significant difference in one direction (ex. dogs are more intelligent than cats… our projects)

9
New cards

two tailed hypothesis

predicts a significant difference without indicating the direction (ex. there will be a difference between dogs and cats in terms of intelligence)

10
New cards

null hypothesis

makes a prediction about NO difference or NO relationships

11
New cards

alternative hypothesis

makes a prediction about a difference or a relationship

12
New cards

hypothesis of difference

predicts a difference (causation)

13
New cards

hypothesis of relationship

predicts a relationship (correlation)

14
New cards

variable level: nominal

categories (ex. types of sports)

15
New cards

variable level: ordinal

ranked but don’t know difference (ex. relationship status 0-6 months, 6-12 months, 12+ months)

16
New cards

variable level: interval

ranked and know magnitude of difference between categories (ex. likert scale)

17
New cards

variable level: ratio

categories are ranked, know difference, and has absolute zero point (ex. anything that can be counted and be zero, exam scores, temperature, age)

18
New cards

If P is greater than .05 there is…

no difference or no relationship

19
New cards

if P is less than .05 there is…

a difference or a relationship

20
New cards

what is the purpose of a t test?

to determine if 2 groups means significantly differ on an interval/ratio level

21
New cards

what is the first question you ask when interpreting a t test output file?

is there a difference between the variances (is data spread out around its mean)

22
New cards

when answering the first question of a t test what do we want to find?

we want no difference in the variances so we can assume equality (P> .05, data is spread out evenly around mean)

23
New cards

where to find answer to question 1 of t test

look at sig under levene’s test for equality of variances

<p>look at sig under levene’s test for equality of variances</p>
24
New cards

what is the second question when interpreting a t test output file?

is there a difference between the means

25
New cards

what do we want to find when answering question 2 of t test

we want to find a difference P<.05 (statistically significant difference between the two variables)

26
New cards

how to find answer to question 2 of t test?

look at box labeled t-test for equality of means and find sig 2-tailed column

<p>look at box labeled t-test for equality of means and find sig 2-tailed column</p>
27
New cards

what is the third question when interpreting t test output file?

what is the effect size?

28
New cards

what do we want to find when answering question 3 of t test?

bigger is better but anything will do (cohens d)

29
New cards

what are the sizes of cohens d?

small=.2, medium= .5, large=.8

30
New cards

how to report t test information?

The study revealed that IV1 (M=mean) are more/less DV than IV2 (M=mean), t(df)= t#, P sentence…, cohen’s d= #. Thus the hypothesis was supported/not supported.

31
New cards

what is the purpose of an ANOVA test

to determine if 3 or more groups means significantly differ an an interval/ratio level

32
New cards

what is the first question you ask yourself when interpreting an ANOVA output file?

is there a difference between the means of the IVs (write out the three levels)

33
New cards

what do we want to find when answering question 1 of ANOVA?

we want to find a difference between the means P<.05

34
New cards

how to find answer to question 1 ANOVA

look at the Tests Between Subjects Effects box, find sig column, use IV row

<p>look at the Tests Between Subjects Effects box, find sig column, use IV row</p>
35
New cards

what is second question when interpreting ANOVA and what do you want to find?

what is the effect size… bigger is better but anything with do (partial eta squared)

36
New cards

ANOVA levels of partial eta squared

small=.01, medium=.06, large=.14 (look at partial eta squared box for IV column

<p>small=.01, medium=.06, large=.14 (look at partial eta squared box for IV column</p>
37
New cards

what is the third question when interpreting an ANOVA output and what do we want to find?

where does the difference lie… we want to be in line with our hypothesis

38
New cards

how to find answer to question 3 ANOVA

look at multiple comparisons box in sig column for any p-value less than .05… if you find one see which IV levels are involved then check descriptives statistics box to see which mean is higher to find answer

<p>look at multiple comparisons box in sig column for any p-value less than .05… if you find one see which IV levels are involved then check descriptives statistics box to see which mean is higher to find answer</p>
39
New cards

How to report ANOVA findings?

This study revealed that IV1 (M=mean#) are more/less DV than IV2 (M=mean#), F(df#, error#) = F#, p sentence>/<, partial eta2= eta#. Thus, the hypothesis was partially supported.

40
New cards

what is the goal of a correlation test

to determine if there is a relationship between two interval/ratio variables

41
New cards

what is the first question you ask when interpreting a Correlation output and what do you want to find?

is there a relationship, we want a relationship (p<.05)

42
New cards

how to find answer to question 1 Correlation?

look at sig row in the box that crosses both variables

<p>look at sig row in the box that crosses both variables</p>
43
New cards

what is the second question for correlation output and what do we want to find

what is the direction, we want it to be in line with the hypothesis

44
New cards

how to find answer to question 2 correlation

look at pearson correlation # to see if it is positive or negative

<p>look at pearson correlation # to see if it is positive or negative</p>
45
New cards

what is the third question when interpreting a correlation output?

what is the strength -1 — 1 continuum

46
New cards

what do we want to find when answering question 3 of correlation?

stronger is better but anything will do (closer to -1 or 1 than 0 then strong in that direction, if closer to 0 than weak relationship)

<p>stronger is better but anything will do (closer to -1 or 1 than 0 then strong in that direction, if closer to 0 than weak relationship)</p>
47
New cards

how to report correlation findings?

This study revealed that as one variable increases/decreases, their other variable increases/decreases, r(N-variable#)= pearson’s correlation#, p sentence.

48
New cards

research validity

accuracy of project as a whole, what you concluded, how accurate it was

49
New cards

measurement validity

how accurate researchers measure what they intend to measure

50
New cards

content validity

do the items properly sample the entire topic/what we intent to measure

51
New cards

criterion related validity

does the technique used match results of previous different techniques (use two different techniques then match scores)

52
New cards

construct validity

does the instrument measure what it is supposed to? (ex. give old validated likert scale and new one to see if scores are related)

53
New cards

ways to manipulate the IV

experimental vs control group, written materials, audio/visual materials, confederates (people in study), and hypothetical scenarios/role playing

54
New cards

4 features of an experimental design

  1. random assignment 2. manipulation of the IV 3. measurement of DV 4. control

55
New cards

things that affect control

threshold effect, experimenter effect, hawthorne effect, extraneous variables

56
New cards

threshold effect: affects control

idea that manipulation of IV needs to reach a certain threshold before it changes the DV (ex. video games are violent but only after 4 hours of play)

57
New cards

experimenter effects: affects control

something related to the experimenter impacts the results of the study

58
New cards

hawthorne effect: affects control

doing an observational study and the participants figure out they are being observed and behave differently

59
New cards

extraneous variables: affects control

something unrelated to the study causes a change in the DV

60
New cards

historical flaw: threat to validity

something unrelated to study is happening in the world and causes participants to behave differently (ex. study on alcohol but student dies from alcohol)

61
New cards

maturation: threat to validity

idea that participants matured naturally and not as a result of manipulation of IV

62
New cards

testing flaw: threat to validity

problem when you give measurement more than once and participants become test wise

63
New cards

selection threat to validity

participants participate in study for nefarious reasons (ex. $100 reward so don’t take study seriously)

64
New cards

attrition threat to validity

when people drop out of your study because it is too long, too personal, etc (happens in longitudinal study)