1/134
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Attitudes
-global evaluations toward some object or issue
Beliefs
-pieces of information about something (cognitively)
why we have attitudes
-they help us to take action
-Mainly used to sort things into “good” and “bad” categories
-Helpful in making choices
-Increase ease, speed, and quality of making choices and decisions
Dual Attitudes
-Different evaluations of the same attitude object held by the same person
-deliberate
-automatic
Automatic attitudes
-Very fast, evaluative
-“gut-level” responses that people don’t think a great deal about
Deliberate attitudes
-Reflective responses that people think more carefully about
how attitudes are formed
-mere exposure effect
mere exposure effect
-tendency to come to like things simply because they are encountered repeatedly
-does not work on things that we have an initial dislike
-effect of physiology on attitude formation study
-showed that our bodily movement can effect our attitudes
-it tricked the participants brains into thinking they felt one way about something, either shaking their head or nodding it
Embodied attitudes
-Bodily movements shape people’s attitudes
Classical conditioning
-Learning through repeated pairings
-a neutral stimulus comes to evoke a conditioned response
operant conditioning (Skinner)
-learning in which people are more likely to repeat behaviors that have been rewarded
-Less likely to repeat behaviors that have been punished
social learning (Bandura)
-learning which occurs when people are more likely to imitate behaviors if they have seen others rewarded for them
-Less likely to imitate behaviors if they have seen others punished for
them
attitude polarization
-people’s attitudes become more extreme as they reflect on them
-May generate new ideas or insights not considered when initial attitudes were formed
-People who hold strong attitudes on certain issues are likely to evaluate relevant evidence in a biased manner
Cognitive dissonance theory
-inconsistencies produce psychological discomfort
-Leads people to rationalize their behavior or change their attitudes
-People want to maintain consistency
-people feel motivated to resolve the dissonance
-we can change our attitudes or behaviors to match the other
-ex you vape everyday but know it’s bad for you so you feel discomfort around the topic, you might try to justify your attitude that vaping isn’t bad for you b/c its easier than changing our behavior
cognitive dissonance study (festinger)
-experimenter asked participants to lie that a boring task was interesting to a new test taker by giving them 1 dollar or 20 dollars, once they told the lie the experimenter asked how interesting the task was for 20 dollars and didn’t lie but one dollar group did and made it favorable, 1 dollar isn’t much so they tried to convince themsleves it was worth it to lie
believing versus doubting
-Believing is automatic
-Doubt may require controlled, conscious thought
assumptive worlds
-people live in social worlds based on certain beliefs about reality
-the world is good/kind
-the world is fair and just
-I am a good person
coping
-how people attempt to deal with stressful traumas and go back to functioning effectively in life
cognitive coping
-idea that beliefs play a central role in helping people cope with and recover from misfortunes
-downward and upward comparisons
gordon allport
-attitude is an important concept in psychology
alan wicker
-attitudes are a trivial peripheral phenomenon
-A-B problem
A-B problem
the problem of inconsistency between attitudes (A) and behaviors (B)
general attitudes and specific behaviors
-attitudes can predict specific behavior, but only when very specific attitudes are measures
behavior agression
-combining attitudes across many different behaviors on different occasions
broad attitudes in context
-an influence specific behaviors when interpreted here and now
-ex. you may be asked about the homeless and say its a valid cause but when asked to serve at a soup kitchen your behavior is different and yo don’t want to
Normative influence
-being liked and accepted
Solomon Asch
-group acceptance is more important than being correct
-line study
Informational influence
-being correct
Muzafer Sherif
-going along with the group because you think they know more than you
-autokinetic effect
groupthink
-a person in a group feels different than others on a topic but doesn’t speak up because they don’t want to disagree
information social influence produces private acceptance
-genuine inner belief that others are right
normative social influences produces public compliance
-inner belief that the group is probs wrong but outwardly going along with the group
commitment and consistency techniques
-foot in door
-Low-ball technique
Foot-in-the-door technique
-Start with a small request to gain eventual compliance with a larger request
Low-ball technique
-Start with a seemingly low-cost request and only later reveal hidden additional costs
Reciprocation techniques
-door-in-the-face technique
-that’s-not-all technique
door in the face technique
-start with large ask then go down to smaller one
that’s not all technique
-Begin with an inflated request, but before the person can respond, sweeten the deal by offering a bonus or discount
Scarcity techniques
-the limited-number technique
-fast-approaching-deadline technique
Limited-number technique
-an item is in short supply (only a limited number available)
Fast-approaching-deadline technique
-an item or price is only available for a limited time
Capturing and disrupting attention
-pique technique
-disrupt-then-reframe technique
Pique technique
-Capture people’s attention by making a novel request
Disrupt-then-reframe technique
-introduce an unexpected element that disrupts critical thinking and then reframe the message in a positive light
mindful persuasion and the Pique technique study
-had a homeless (confederate) person ask for money with specific amount (IV) but when other confederates asked for an atypical amount people were more likely to give money (DV)
-found that there was 60% more likelihood for people to give money to unusual request becasue it get’t their attention than a normal amount
persuasion
attempt to change a persons attitude
components of persuasion
-Who: the message source (credibility and likability are important elements)
-Says what: the message (reason, facts vs appealing to emotions)
-To whom: the audience (what are the characteristics of the members of the audience)
who: the source
source: individual who delivers message
-credible or not: expertise and trustworthiness
-source likability: influenced by similarity and physical attractiveness
-halo effect
halo effect
-the assumption that people with one desirable trait (e.g., attractiveness) also possess many other desirable traits (ex. intelligence)
says what: the message
-Reason versus emotion: Present the cold, hard facts or appeal to emotions (e.g., good mood, humor,and fear)
-One-sided versus two-sided messages
-One-sided messages: more effective when audience members are less educated or have already made up their minds
-Repetition: repeat exposure influences memory
-Advertisement wear-out
audience characteristics
-know characteristic of audience
-distraction: get the conscious mind out of the way
central route persuasion
-involves deliberate mind
-careful thoughtful consideration of the content of the persuasive message
peripheral route persuasion
-involves automatic mind
-influenced by a simple cue
resisting social influence
-attitude inoculation
-forewarned is forearmed
-stockpile resources
attraction
-anything that draws two or more people together
Social acceptance
-Other people have come to like you, respect you, approve of you, and include you in their groups and relationships
Rejection
Others exclude you, so that you are not able to form or keep a social bond with them
Forming bonds is a big part of human life
-Vital to form and maintain some relationships
-Involves securing acceptance
Belongingness as a basic need
-Desire to form and maintain close, lasting relationships
-Drives people to affiliate, commit, and remain together
two parts of belonging
regular social contacts
stable frameowrk of some ongoing relationhsip: mutual concern for each other
Not belonging is bad for you
-Higher rates of disease, affects mental/physical health, and increases death risks
ingratitation
-what people actively do to try to make others like them
Dissimilarities in Physical Attractiveness study
-the more dissimilar couples were, the more liekly they were to break up
Social rewards
-you make me feel good
Reinforcement theory
-people and animals will perform behaviors that have been rewarded more than they will perform other behaviors
Social allergy effect
-a partner’s annoying habits become more annoying over time
“You again”
-mere exposure
-People grow to like people whom they encounter on a regular basis (propinquity)
What is beautiful is good effect
-physically attractive people will be viewed as superior to others on many other traits (halo effect)
online dating advantages and dissadvantages
-Expands range of potential partners
-Enables communication before meeting
-Allows searching for best matches
-People do not always tell the truth in their online profiles
-Is not a magic recipe for finding love
ostracism
-being excluded, rejected, and ignored
effects of rejection
-inner reactions
-Pain
-illness
-depression
-suicidal thoughts
-eating disorders
-helplessness,
-promiscuity
-low self-esteem
-feelings of worthlessness
rejection sensitivity
-expecting rejection from others and to become hypersensitive to possible rejection
social exclusion weakens restraint studies.
-rejected people ate more cookies but drank less of a healthy but bad-tasting beverage
-rejected people are more likely to eat fattening or junk food
-rejection undermines self-regulation
behavioral effects of rejection
-Show decrease in intelligent thought
- Approach new interactions with skepticism
-Are less generous, cooperative, and helpful
-Are more willing to cheat or break rules
-Act in short-sighted, impulsive, and even self-destructive ways
Why some people kill or harm
-rejection leads to aggression
-Aggression leads to rejection
rejection in young kids
-due to aggression, withdrawal, being different
loneliness
-painful feeling of wanting more human contact or connection than you have
unrequited love
-One person loves another, but the other does not return that love
romantic rejection
-Men are more often in the rejected role
—can lead to stalking
-women are more often in the rejecting role
stalking
-Persisting in romantic, courtship, or other behaviors that frighten and harass the rejecter in a relationship
interpersonal attraction
-affiliation
-belonging
sexual fluditity
-people can change their sexual orientation throughout their lives
what is love and intimacies
-love changes over time
Love-based marriages are more fragile than arranged marriages
-love is not a feeling
-Real love grows while superficial love will fade
-our language for love is inadequate
-love is often misdiagnosed
-love is paradoxical
-giving love is receiving love
Sternbergs love triangle
-passion
-intimacy
-commitment
types of love
-liking
-infatuated love
-empty love
-romantic love
-companionte love
-fatuous love
-consummate love
parts of a relationship
-discernment
-initiation
-negotiation
-cohibition
-commitment
theories that help explain how systems shape relationships
-anatonormativity
-compulsory sexuality
-cisheteronormality
what do we know works
-love
-intimacy
-trust
-appreciation
prejudice
-a negative feeling toward an individual due to their group
membership
racism
-prejudiced attitudes toward a particular race
Explicit vs. subtle racism
-Microaggressions: commonplace daily verbal, behavioral or environmental slights, whether intentional or unintentional, that communicate hostile, derogatory, or negative attitudes toward stigmatized or culturally marginalized groups
Aversive racism
-simultaneously holding egalitarian values and negative feelings toward people of other race
Discrimination
-unequal treatment of different people based on their group membership
ABCs of intergroup relationships
-Affective component: prejudice
-Behavioral component: discrimination
-Cognitive component: stereotyping
stereotypes
-beliefs that associate groups with certain traits
-comes from evolution; see someone who could put you in dnager you stereotype
-subtypes
-categorization
-social categorization
Subtypes
-categories for people who don’t fit a general stereotype
Categorization
-the natural tendency to sort objects into groups
Social categorization
-sorting people into groups on the basis of common characteristics (e.g., race, gender, age, sexual orientation, and religion)
police shooting study (stereotyping)
-looked at police decision to use lethal force or not
-found that officers, both white and black, were more likely to make wrong decisions when the suspect was black comapred to white
-training is important to counteract stereotypes