kohlberg

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/8

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 3:56 PM on 3/24/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

9 Terms

1
New cards

kohlberg: sample

  • 75 American boys 

  • Aged 10-16 at the beginning of the study 

  • Aged 22-28 at the end 

  • Also studied people from Great Britain, Taiwan, Mexico and Turkey 

2
New cards

kohlberg: methodology

  • Kohlberg used interviews to assess the moral reasoning of the boys 

  • Longitudinal study:  over a period of 12 years, interviews were re done every 3 years 

  • Cross cultural comparison 

3
New cards

kohlberg: strength, longitudinal

  • Longitudinal: shows moral development over time, same sample of boys helps reduce impact of participant variables 

  • HOWEVER, takes too long with a high risk of sample attrition, Kohlberg may lose contact 

4
New cards

kohlberg: strength, cross cultural

  • Cross cultural: allows us to see if moral development is universal or culturally relative 

  • HOWEVER, Kohlberg took dilemmas and questions that were American and used them in other cultures where they weren’t relevant  

5
New cards

kohlberg: strength, interviews

  • Interviews: used open ended questions for boys to give their reasoning on moral dilemmas, resulted in qualitative data allowing Kohlberg to understand the moral reasoning in detail 

  • HOWEVER, difficult to analyse the data as boys reasoning for each dilemma may have been different 

6
New cards

kohlberg: weakness, identity

  • Boys may struggle to identify with the dilemma, not relevant (steal drugs for wife) - this may mean the answers they give don’t accurately reflect their moral reasoning 

  • This lowers the validity of the study 

7
New cards

kohlberg: weakness, hypothetical

  • The dilemmas were hypothetical, so it's not true how they might act if this moral dilemma was happening 

  • This makes the study lack ecological validity 

8
New cards

kohlberg: ethics, right to withdraw

  • May have been given the right to withdraw 

  • HOWEVER, some participants may have felt obligated to continue due to longitudinal method, feeling like they must stay for the 12-year duration 

9
New cards

kohlberg: ethics, informed consent

  • It's assumed that parents gave informed consent 

  • HOWEVER, children can’t give informed consent as they are unlikely to understand the study