1/72
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Public international law
The collection of rules that regulate the relations between states, all of which are based on state acceptance
i.e. aims for coexistence, cooperation, equality, stability between states that are independent but interdependent
Determining the competence of each international actor
Ratione territorii, ratione temporis, ratione personae, ratione materiae
Ratione territorii
“by reason of place” - is this within the territory that the court has authority?
Ratione temporis
“by reason of time” - is this within the period of time that the court has authority?
Ratione personae
“by reason of person” - do the courts have authority over these legal / natural persons?
Ratione materiae
“by reason of subject matter” - does the court have authority to hear the case based on its subject matter?
What the ICJ applies
international conventions
international custom
general principles of law
judicial decisions and teachings of highly qualified publicists of many nations
International customary law
universal obligations arising from established, consistent state practice (objective element) and the belief that the action is legally required (opinio juris, subjective element)
it is not written down, so states may disagree on how it is applied and followed
Persistent objector rule
states are not bound if they persistently object to this law during its formation
General principles of international law
international law derived from principles of law that are widely recognised across major legal systems
used to close the gap when there is no treaty or customary rule
the ICJ can apply a ruling based on this even to a state that does not have the principle of law in its own domestic legal system
ex aequo et bono ICJ
The ICJ will rule “according to what is good and just” rather than according to the law if both parties consent
Treaty definition
agreement between states where all members legally bind themselves
Other name for treaty
convention, international agreement, general act, charter, statute, declaration, covenant
Jus cogens
“preemptory norms”: universally-accepted principles of public international law
treaties that try and bypass them are null and void (by the Vienna Convention Article 53)
How a treaty is acceded to
states cannot invoke a conflicting domestic law to avoid a treaty obligation
signature: not binding
definitive signature: binding
ratification: binding. A formal step (often involving parliamentary approval) where a state officially notifies other parties it is bound.
accession: binding. If allowed, a state can join a treaty after the initial signing
Internal self-determination
a people's right to pursue political, economic, social, and cultural development within an existing state
External self-determination
a people’s right to determine international status, including independence, association, or integration (often in post-colonial or remedial contexts)
Sovereignty
exclusivity: lack of other authorities in the same territory
effective: real achievement of power
inalienable: cannot be given to other states
1648 Peace of Westphalia
replaced feudal, religious, and imperial power structures with a system of equal, independent nation-states
states are the most dominant legal entity, all non-state actors derive their legal status from states
Attribution of powers held by international organisations
they may only act within the limits of powers explicitly assigned to them by states in a founding document (treaty, charter)
Implied powers of international organisations
presumed to have the necessary powers to achieve its objectives, even if they are not written explicitly
presumption is sometimes needed for ICJ interpretation
Actors in international law
state, supranational organisation, international organisation, NGO, transnational organisation (global corporation), individual
UN: founding date, goal
1945, no more world wars
UN: founding document
UN Charter: a multilateral treaty, organises the rights & obligations of member states, its purposes & principles, its functions & limitations
UN Charter Article 2
principles
sovereign equality
everybody has obligations so everybody can have rights
no arguments that threaten international peace & security or justice
no threats or uses of force against states
everybody helps the UN in its actions e.g. no assistance for states under preventative/enforcement action
UN will impose principles upon non-member states if they are threatening international peace & security
UN cannot intervene in domestic matters
UN Charter Article 4
UN Membership
membership open to any peace-loving state that accepts the obligations
UN Security Council recommends a prospective member, then General Assembly accepts or dismisses
UN Charter Article 51
self-defence
members can defend themselves / each other in response to an armed attack in the time it takes for the UN Security Council to decide on what to do
UN: principal organs
General Assembly
Security Council
Economic & Social Council
Trusteeship Council
Secretariat
International Court of Justice
UN General Assembly
parliamentary body of the UN
all member states represented & have 1 vote
UN General Assembly resolution
a formal, written proposal adopted by a majority of members to express the collective will / opinion
International Covenant on Civil & Political Rights
A UNGA treaty, adopted 1966
part of the International Bill of Human Rights
guarantees rights such as the right to life, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, fair trials, and privacy
UN Security Council powers
determines the existence of any threat to / breach of peace
can employ measures that don’t involve armed forces, and others if deemed necessary
UN Security Council members
5 permanent members, all of whom have veto rights: US, UK, France, Russia, China
10 temporary members: UN members on a rotating basis
UN Security Council resolutions
at least 9 members agree & no veto → resolution binding on all UN members
International Court of Justice acceptance of rulings
jurisdiction dependent on the state accepting it, which can also be withdrawn
Means of dispute resolution in public international law
diplomacy
arbitration (parties elect a third party to make a binding decision)
ICJ (though no binding precedent)
specified dispute settlement bodies (e.g. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea)
Council of Europe: founding date & focus
1948, focused on human rights, democracy, rule of law
Council of Europe: sub-groups
has European Court of Human Rights & European Social Committee
not a part of the EU
History of EU Treaties
1952 ECSC (Treaty of Paris)
1957 EEC, Euratom (Treaty of Rome)
1987 Single European Act
1992 Treaty on the European Union (Maastricht Treaty)
1997 normalising majority voting (Treaty of Amsterdam)
2001 Charter of Fundamental Rights (Treaty of Nice)
2004 EU constitution failed
2009 Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (Treaty of Lisbon)
Copenhagen criteria
standards for membership
stable institutions that guarantee democracy, rule of law, human rights for population
market economy and ability to cope with competitive pressure of the EU
ability to implement all EU law
EU membership process
all members must accept the state as a potential member
preparations to implement all the EU law
all EU members need to sign and ratify the agreement that the state is a new member after preparations
List of EU institutions
European Commission, European Council, European Parliament, Council of the EU, Court of Justice, European Central Bank
All listed EU institutions are headed by…
a president
European Council
defines the EU’s general political direction
members are the heads of state/government (whoever represents the nation’s political power)
Council of the EU
legislative power
members represent their nations
they are ministers of relevant topics
European Commission
executive power
does the bulk of EU administrative work, 32 000 staff
members include one commissioner per member state, not representing their nation, appointed by EP
Court of Justice
judiciary power
as the EU operates on a common law system, the court makes binding interpretation
has limited direct actions (to enforce judgement?)
European Parliament
legislative power
approves budget, supervises European Commission
720 members, they represent citizens of the EU rather than their state, elected directly
European Central Bank ECB
executive power
manages national bank cooperation, EU monetary policy, price stability
Where EU has exclusive competence
customs, competition rules, monetary policy
Where competence is shared between EU and domestically
internal market, consumer protection, labour, environment
Where EU only has supporting competence to domestic law
health, culture, employment, education
Principles for EU competences
principle of conferral, of subsidiarity, and of proportionality
Principle of conferral
to act only within the power granted by member states
Principle of subsidiarity
to act in non-exclusive areas (shared competences) only if member states cannot effectively achieve the goal otherwise
Principle of proportionality
to not act beyond what is necessary to achieve treaty goals
Spillover
a secondary goal needs to be achieved in order to complete the primary one
Spillover in EU context
spillover can mean that while trying to achieve one goal, the EU is extended into more and more issues
e.g. completion of the single market needs harmonisation of taxes
Spillback
the achievement of one goal is prevented by a blockage in another area
Spillback in EU context
EU might be unable to achieve one goal if it does not have the competence over another area that is necessary to achieve it
EU ordinary legislative procedure
European Commission proposes a law → European Parliament & Council of the EU approve → EU legislation
Hierarchy of EU legislation
lex superior: primary > secondary law
EU primary law
Treaty of the European Union TEU
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU
Unwritten general principles
EU secondary law
regulations (immediately, directly binding on all legal subjects)
directives (need to be transposed into national law to be binding)
decisions (binding only to whom it is addressed)
Can an individual company invoke EU law against a member state?
Van Gend & Loos 1963
Dutch state tried to impose a customs duty on a company. Company refused because of EU law preventing this.
CJEU ruled in favour of the company
Can an individual invoke EU law against a member state?
Costa v. ENEL 1964
Italy nationalised electricity into a monopoly. Costa refused to pay the bill on the basis that EU law outlawed state monopolies.
CJEU ruled in favour of Costa. This established the lex superior: EU law > national law
Can an individual invoke EU law against an individual company?
Defrenne II 1976
CJEU ruled that yes they can, companies must comply with EU law
EU principle of primacy
in case of conflict: lex superior is EU law > national law, including constitution
legislative: member states must not enact rules contradicting EU law
executive & judiciary: must interpret national provisions in line with EU law
EU principle of direct effect
EU rules to be directly applied by domestic courts and authorities if they are unconditional and sufficiently precise.
this principle is always applicable in vertical cases (private person/company v. state)
principle not always applicable in horizontal cases if it concerns a directive
EU principle of mutual recognition
Cassis de Dijon 1979: established the principle of “mutual recognition” -goods lawfully produced and marketed in one EU Member State must generally be allowed in all others.
Member states can only restrict the free movement of goods through national law standards if they are “necessary” (e.g. for public health, for consumer protection)
Consequences of free movement of goods, services, people, capital
goods: prohibition on restrictions to trade of goods
services: prohibition on restrictions to trade of services
people:
capital: effectively requires a common currency & monetary policy
Negative integration of the EU
integration of trade & markets by removing national barriers (tariffs, regulations) often driven by court rulings
Positive integration of the EU
integration of trade & markets by establishing common EU-wide policies and institutions, often driven by EU directives
minimum harmonisation can be enforced (an “at least” rule, leaving nations the option to go above and beyond)
full harmonisation can be enforced (every nation must obey the exact rule)