RWE: Market structure

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/35

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 8:41 PM on 5/9/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

36 Terms

1
New cards

Who (monopoly)

google

2
New cards

what (monopoly)

Has 90% of market share in search engine market

3
New cards

where (monopoly)

globally

4
New cards

when (monopoly)

2020’s

5
New cards

why (monopoly)

Due to high barriers to entry, other firms are unable to enter this market

6
New cards

how (monopoly)

They have created brand loyalty by paying Apple and Samsung approx 25 billion dollars per year to ensure Google is the default search engine on these phones.

7
New cards

who (natural monopoly)

skanetrafiken

8
New cards

what (natural monopoly)

It’s considered a natural monopoly as it holds 100% control over the regional public transport

9
New cards

where (natural monopoly)

skane, sweden

10
New cards

when (natural monopoly)

2000’s

11
New cards

why (natural monopoly)

Operating as a natural monopoly, it coordinates a single network to avoid the wasteful cost of building overlapping train tracks and bus stops.

12
New cards

how (natural monopoly)

High fixed costs for infrastructure create massive barriers to entry

13
New cards

who (collusive oligopoly)

11 yoghurt firms (Laita, Alsace Lait, etc)

14
New cards

what (collusive oligopoly)

Eleven firms face 193 million euros fine due to being in a cartel

15
New cards

when (collusive)

2015

16
New cards

where (collusive)

france

17
New cards

why (collusive)

These firms were colluding by fixing a price for yogurt in supermarkets

18
New cards

how (collusive)

They met up for smoking, had burner phones

19
New cards

who (non collusive)

 Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi

20
New cards

what (non collusive)

Controlled near 90% of the insulin market

21
New cards

where (non collusive)

USA

22
New cards

when (non collusive)

2010-2015

23
New cards

why (non collusive)

Sanofi was the ‘dominant leader’. As it increased its price first, the other two firms followed. 

24
New cards

how (non collusive)

High barriers to entry as insulin has high production costs, filed patents on their productions. 

25
New cards

who (Monopolistic Competition)

pizza shop owners

26
New cards

what (Monopolistic Competition)

Around 30 shops competing for the same customers by offering slightly differentiated pizzas.

27
New cards

when (Monopolistic Competition)

still happening

28
New cards

where (Monopolistic Competition)

helsingborg sweden

29
New cards

why (Monopolistic Competition)

Low barriers to entry allow many small businesses to start up, preventing any single shop from owning the entire market.

30
New cards

how (Monopolistic Competition)

They use product differentiation (unique recipes, specific locations, or premium ingredients) to act as "price-makers," allowing them to charge different prices (e.g., 115 SEK vs 175 SEK) without losing all their customers to a cheaper rival.

31
New cards

who (Perfect Competition)

strawberry sellers

32
New cards

what (Perfect Competition)

Strawberries are sold at the same prices across all stores and strawberry stands during the summer season

33
New cards

where (Perfect Competition)

helsingborg sweden

34
New cards

when (Perfect Competition)

june-august

35
New cards

why (Perfect Competition)

Very low barriers to entry, homogeneous products coming from the same crop, multiple sellers

36
New cards

how (Perfect Competition)

 Sellers are price takers. The market price is usually 100 SEK per liter. If a seller tries to sell it for more than the market price, consumers go to another stall.