1/19
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Johnson response to the TET offensive
consulted advisors - plan of de Americanisation of conflict - leave it to ARVN
1968 - announced seeking peace
-didn’t stand for a re-election
Nixon
President in 1968
“peace with honour”
MAD-man theory
concerned over wavering public opinion
-peace talks but continued to bomb Cambodia
Nixon’s aims from the peace treaty
-needed to make sure it didn’t look like a waste of US time
set Le Duc Thieu (SV) in a good position to remain non-communist
pledged to keep econ support but not troops
Vietnamisation
aimed to strengthen SV army, so US troops could withdraw in 1969
1970 - 150,000 left
1971 - only 150,000 remained
1972 - 47,000
ARVN grew to 1m via conscription but thousands also deserted
negotiation compromise
aimed for Vietnamisation would increase willingness North to negotiate
-also invaded Laos and Cambodia to try get NV to negotiate
How successful ?
1972 Spring offensive by NV - ARVN 8000 casualties vs NV 40,000
US continued to support via bombing
-ARVN ineffective force which still heavily relied on US
-SV had little sense of nationalism, corruption, low morale, desertion
Cambodia - Operation menu 1969
bomb areas regarded as safe in Cambodia
-attempt to get NV to negotiate
-disrupt Ho chi minh trail
-retain SV confidence, during Vietnamisation period
General Lon Nol
1970 - Prince Norodom Sihanouk (head of state) overthrown by General Lon Nol
NV backed Khmer Rouge led by Pol Pot
Nixon’s fear + response
Nixon feared of communist rule in Cambodia
-cross boarder raids of SV + US air support into Cambodia
April 1970 - US 20,000 group troops support
shows us strengthened commitment to war
Laos
-Nixon determined to further disrupt ho chi minh trail in LAOS
-congress banned US troops, so used US air force + SV forces
Operation Lam Son 719
Feb 1971
-30,000 ARVN attacked - 3000 casualties
-NV force far superior, forcing ARVN to withdraw
Result of Laos
-highlighted lack of leadership + weakness of ARVN
only had a chance of success with US support
-failed to move to “peace with honour”
Relations with china
-Nixon + Kissinger saw importance of sino-american relations
-china also realised of self-imposed isolation was no benefit
-current tensions between china and USSR e.g. border disputes
USA - Artichoke approach
gradual reduced relations in layers
1969 - US removed trade controls + relaxed travel restrictions
promote idea of US willingness to improve relations
China’s role - Zhou Enlai
China PM - helped shift policy away from dual confrontation
-MAO did not reject US threat but saw USSR threat as greater
Kissinger
believer in detent + improved sino-american relations
July 1971 - visit Beijing - made agreement for presidential visit
OCt 1971 - 2nd trip - Kissinger failed to persuade China to pressure NV into peace processes
1968-72 Beginning of Paris Peace talks
March 1968 - Johnson said intention to negotiate settlement with NV
talks broke down, during NV force on defensive during TET - don’t want to appear weak
sides non convinced of full commitment
1970-72 Meeting between US and NV in Paris
1970 FEB - Kissinger + Le duc tho (special advisor for North) met to negotiate
Le Duc Tho - insisted on replacement of SV president + coalition gov in Saigon that included NLF
US response
didn’t agree as:
-ousting Nguyen Van Thieu would destabilise SV + leave US allies vulnerable
-NFL political wing of Vietcong - had done great damage to US
OCT 1972 NV position
NV moderates position on Thieu’s removal
-strat of keep talks going, while continuing ground war