Rsearch methods Final flashcards

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/259

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 10:01 PM on 4/23/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

260 Terms

1
New cards
Producers of research
People who conduct studies, collect data, analyze results, and create new scientific knowledge.
2
New cards
Consumers of research
People who read, interpret, evaluate, and apply research findings, even if they do not conduct studies themselves.
3
New cards
Why are producers of research important?
They generate new knowledge, test theories, solve problems, and expand what we know scientifically.
4
New cards
Why are consumers of research important?
They use research to make informed decisions, evaluate claims, apply evidence in real-world settings, and avoid being misled by weak or false claims.
5
New cards
Empiricism
The approach of using systematic observation, measurement, and evidence to understand the world.
6
New cards
Why is empiricism important in research?
It bases conclusions on evidence rather than intuition, opinion, or anecdote.
7
New cards
Theory-data cycle
The scientific process in which theories lead to hypotheses, hypotheses are tested with data, and the data support, change, or refine the theory.
8
New cards
Theory
A broad explanation or set of principles that organizes observations and predicts outcomes.
9
New cards
Hypothesis
A specific, testable prediction derived from a theory.
10
New cards
Role of data in the theory-data cycle
Data provide evidence that supports, weakens, or refines hypotheses and theories.
11
New cards
Basic research
Research conducted to enhance general knowledge and understand fundamental principles, without an immediate practical goal.
12
New cards
Example of basic research
A study examining how memory works in the brain.
13
New cards
Applied research
Research conducted to solve a specific, practical problem.
14
New cards
Example of applied research
Testing whether a new therapy reduces anxiety in college students.
15
New cards
Translational research
Research that uses knowledge from basic research to develop practical applications.
16
New cards
Example of translational research
Using discoveries about brain functioning to design treatments for depression.
17
New cards
Main goal of basic research
To understand and explain behavior or mental processes.
18
New cards
Main goal of applied research
To address a real-world issue directly.
19
New cards
Main goal of translational research
To bridge the gap between basic science and practical use.
20
New cards
How is research different from personal experience?
Research uses systematic methods and often comparison groups, while personal experience is unsystematic and usually lacks a comparison group.
21
New cards
Why is experience weaker than research as evidence?
Experience is limited, biased, and usually does not allow us to compare outcomes systematically.
22
New cards
How is research different from intuition?
Research is based on evidence and systematic testing; intuition is based on gut feeling or immediate judgment.
23
New cards
Being swayed by a good story
Believing a claim because it is vivid, compelling, or memorable, even if evidence is weak.
24
New cards
Availability heuristic
The tendency to judge how common or likely something is based on how easily examples come to mind.
25
New cards
Why can the availability heuristic be misleading?
Memorable events are not always the most common or accurate representation of reality.
26
New cards
Confirmation bias
The tendency to notice, seek, and remember evidence that supports what we already believe, while ignoring contradictory evidence.
27
New cards
Bias blind spot
The tendency to think other people are biased while believing we ourselves are objective.
28
New cards
Why is research better than intuition?
Research uses structured methods to reduce bias and test ideas objectively.
29
New cards
Empirical journal article
A scholarly report of a research study that includes the study’s question, methods, results, and conclusions.
30
New cards
Purpose of the abstract
Gives a brief summary of the study’s question, methods, results, and conclusions.
31
New cards
Purpose of the introduction
Explains the background, theory, previous research, and the study’s hypotheses.
32
New cards
Purpose of the method section
Describes how the study was conducted, including participants, measures, and procedures.
33
New cards
Purpose of the results section
Presents the statistical analyses and findings of the study.
34
New cards
Purpose of the discussion section
Interprets the results, explains implications, notes limitations, and suggests future directions.
35
New cards
Purpose of the references section
Lists the sources cited in the article.
36
New cards
Reading with a purpose
Actively identifying the study’s argument, evidence, methods, and conclusions instead of reading passively.
37
New cards
Argument in a research article
The main claim or conclusion the authors are making.
38
New cards
Supportive evidence in a research article
The data, methods, and results that back up the authors’ argument.
39
New cards
Variable
Something that can vary or take on different values.
40
New cards
Constant
Something that does not vary in a study.
41
New cards
Manipulated variable
A variable the researcher controls or changes.
42
New cards
Measured variable
A variable the researcher observes and records without changing it.
43
New cards
Conceptual definition
The abstract, general meaning of a variable.
44
New cards
Operational definition
The specific way a variable is measured or manipulated in a study.
45
New cards
Example of a conceptual definition of stress
Stress as a psychological state involving pressure or tension.
46
New cards
Example of an operational definition of stress
Score on a stress questionnaire or cortisol level.
47
New cards
Frequency claim
A claim that describes the rate or level of a single variable.
48
New cards
Example of a frequency claim
Thirty percent of students experience test anxiety.
49
New cards
Association claim
A claim stating that two variables are related.
50
New cards
Positive association
As one variable increases, the other also increases.
51
New cards
Example of a positive association
More study time is associated with higher exam scores.
52
New cards
Negative association
As one variable increases, the other decreases.
53
New cards
Example of a negative association
More stress is associated with lower sleep quality.
54
New cards
Zero association
There is no relationship between the two variables.
55
New cards
How can association claims be used for prediction?
If two variables are related, knowing one variable may help predict the other.
56
New cards
Causal claim
A claim stating that one variable causes a change in another.
57
New cards
Four validities
Construct validity, external validity, statistical validity, and internal validity.
58
New cards
Construct validity
How well a study’s variables are measured or manipulated.
59
New cards
External validity
The extent to which the findings generalize to other people, settings, or times.
60
New cards
Statistical validity
The extent to which the statistical conclusions are accurate and reasonable.
61
New cards
Internal validity
The extent to which a study supports a cause-and-effect conclusion.
62
New cards
Which validities are most important for frequency claims?
Construct validity and external validity.
63
New cards
Why does a frequency claim need construct validity?
Because the variable must be measured well.
64
New cards
Why does a frequency claim need external validity?
Because the estimate must generalize to a broader population.
65
New cards
Which validities are most important for association claims?
Construct validity, external validity, and statistical validity.
66
New cards
Which validities are most important for causal claims?
All four, especially internal validity.
67
New cards
Null hypothesis
The idea that there is no effect or no relationship.
68
New cards
Alternative hypothesis
The idea that there is an effect or a relationship.
69
New cards
Type I error
Concluding there is an effect when there really is not one; a false positive.
70
New cards
Type II error
Concluding there is no effect when there really is one; a false negative.
71
New cards
Three criteria for a causal claim
Covariation, temporal sequence, and ruling out third variables.
72
New cards
Covariation
The two variables must be related.
73
New cards
Temporal sequence
The cause must come before the effect.
74
New cards
Third variables or confounds
Other variables that could explain the relationship between the two main variables.
75
New cards
Three main types of measurement
Behavioral, physiological, and self-report.
76
New cards
Behavioral measure
A measure based on observing actions or behaviors.
77
New cards
Example of a behavioral measure
Number of times a person checks their phone.
78
New cards
Physiological measure
A measure based on biological or bodily data.
79
New cards
Example of a physiological measure
Heart rate, blood pressure, or cortisol level.
80
New cards
Self-report measure
A measure in which people answer questions about themselves.
81
New cards
Example of a self-report measure
A depression inventory or survey.
82
New cards
Converging measures
Using multiple kinds of measures to assess the same construct.
83
New cards
Why use converging measures?
They strengthen confidence that the construct is being captured accurately.
84
New cards
Reliability
The consistency or stability of a measure.
85
New cards
Test-retest reliability
The consistency of scores when the same people take the same measure at two different times.
86
New cards
How is test-retest reliability evaluated?
By correlating Time 1 scores with Time 2 scores.
87
New cards
What does a reliability coefficient around .70 suggest?
Generally acceptable reliability.
88
New cards
How can a scatterplot help evaluate test-retest reliability?
If the points cluster around a line, scores are consistent across time.
89
New cards
Internal consistency reliability
The extent to which items on a measure are consistent with one another.
90
New cards
What does high internal consistency mean?
The items are all measuring the same general construct.
91
New cards
Validity in measurement
The extent to which a measure actually measures what it claims to measure.
92
New cards
Face validity
Whether a measure appears, on the surface, to assess what it is supposed to assess.
93
New cards
Content validity
Whether a measure covers all important parts of the construct.
94
New cards
Which kinds of measures are often evaluated with face and content validity?
Subjective measures, especially self-report scales.
95
New cards
Difference between content validity and internal consistency
Content validity asks whether the measure covers the full construct; internal consistency asks whether the items hang together statistically.
96
New cards
Why might a measure have strong internal consistency but poor content validity?
Because all items may be similar but may fail to cover the whole construct.
97
New cards
Convergent validity
When a measure correlates with other measures of the same or similar construct.
98
New cards
Discriminant or divergent validity
When a measure does not correlate strongly with measures of different constructs.
99
New cards
Why are convergent and divergent validity considered empirical?
Because they are tested using actual data and relationships among measures.
100
New cards
Random sampling
Selecting participants so every member of the population has an equal or known chance of being chosen.