1/7
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
what is internal labour market
labour isnt controlled by supply and demand
operates where pricing and allocation of labour operates under a series of administrative procedures
ilm characteristics
hiring at limited number of port of entry
internal promotion
wages insulated from external shocks
wages generally above employees reservation wages
seniority premium
expectation of long term employment
why would firms bypass the market
overcoming info asymmetry - firms know far more abt the dependability, motivation and quality pof current emmployees than they do ab outside applicants
encouraging fshc - ilms provide stability needed for workers to invest in skills that are highly productive within that firm but no value elsewhere
cost reduction - if promote within, firms avoid the sig costs and risks associated with recruiting screening training external workers for senior roles
risk sharing
why do some firms not use ILMs
generic skills - ilms are ill suited for roles requiring generic skills like it where workers can easily move between employers
inflexibility - admin rules are slow to adapt to rapid technological changes that might degrade specific internal skills
global competition - intense market pressure often forces firms to tear up these implicit contracts in favour of cheaper outsourcing
whats a promotion tournament
contestants compete for a prize based on relative performance rather than absolute output
for promo to be considered a tournament must have these features
uncertainty - winner csnnot be predicted with certianty at start
relative performance - selection based on how a worker performs in comparison to peers
concentrated rewards - prize" (pay and prestige) is concentrated in the hands of the winner, creating a significant disparity between winning and losing
pros of promotion tournament
incentive for effort - large prize gap induces workers to expend extra effort to inc prob of winning. a worker will provide this effort as long as the Marginal Benefit (the expected prize) exceeds the Marginal Cost of the added effort or disutility.
sorting value - effective way for frims to sort most talented indiv for senior leadership positions eg ceos
cons of promo tournament
sabotage - contestants may decide the easiest way to win is not by inc own output but by reducing output of rivals
demotivation of losers - once prize is awarded, losers may become disgruntled, less productive
risky entrants - highly concentrated rewards may attract risky candidates who have high variance in perf, can be dangerous for firm