1/11
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Lateralisation
The dominance of one hemisphere of the brain for particular physical and psychological functions
The limbic system
controls our emotions
located around the central core of the brain
interconnected with hypothalamus
contains hippocampus
has key roles in memory
The central core
regulates involuntary behaviours such as breathing, sleeping or sneezing
regulates eating and drinking
regulates endocrine system to maintain homeostasis
The cerebrum
regulates higher intellectual processes
made up of the left and right hemispheres
hemispheres are connected by fibres called corpus callosum
Localisation
The theory that specific areas of the brain are associated with particular physical and psychological functions
What does the corpus callosum do?
Enables messages to enter the right hemisphere to be conveyed to the left hemisphere and vice versa
Broca’s area
An area of the frontal lobe of the brains left hemisphere in most people responsible for speech production
Wernicke’s area
An area of the temporal lobe in the left hemisphere in most people responsible for language comprehension
Evidence for Wernicke’s and Broca’s area
Peterson (1988) used brain scans to show how Wernicke’s area was active during a listening task and Broca’s area was active during a reading task, suggesting that these areas are responsible for these tasks
Neurosugical evidence for localisation
Neurosurgery is still used today for treatment resistant severe depressives and extreme cases of OCD. The success of these procedures strongly suggest that symptoms and behaviours associated with serious mental disorders are localised.
Case study evidence for localisation
Gage after being impaled by an iron pole through his left cheek, passing behind his left eye, and exciting his brain and skull
Survived but was left with a severe personality change
Caveat to localisation
Higher cognitive functions are not localised.
Lashley (1950) suggests that basic motor and sensory functions are localised, but not higher mental functions
Lashley claimed that intact areas of the cortex could take over responsibility for specific cognitive functions following injury to the area normally responsible for that function
According to this point of view, the effects of damage to the brain would be determined by the extent rather than the location of the damage
This view is supported by the discovery that humans were able to regain some of their cognitive abilities following damage to specific areas of the brain