1/7
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Intro
Pressure groups are a cornerstone of democracy - influence the course of societal progression
'Little influence' - little notable engagement by gov and public
Notions that - Pressure groups often fail, they don't play a major role in UK controversies, and they are often ignored by political parties and gov by extension
Pressure groups have great influence on the UK, as they have changed the face of the country
Much of what minorities have been due to pressure groups, often relied on by said groups and are essential to maintaining functional representative democracy
Perhaps the strongest argument against my viewpoint is that pressure groups in the UK are 'more likely to fail then succeed'
success of pressure groups is limited
Can be seen by 'Just Stop Oil'/Extinction Rebellion - gov authorised hundreds of new oil licenses in July of 2023
Little influence on UK because can be argued that groups are failing, thus they are not impacting life in the UK, nor the actions of its government
Not achieved their main goal
Many people also do not interact with groups as they aren't succeeding, so it can be argued tha pressure groups have little effect - stuck in cycle
However, this argument is flawed, as an entire goal does not have to be reached for a pressure group to have 'immense' influence, and pressure groups do regularly achieve some of their goals.
For instance, the source discusses how supportive public opinion of (the actions of) a pressure group can affect a government and society as a whole - applies even if goal not achieved
The stop the war coalition in 2003 did not succeed per say, as the war was indeed not stopped, and Tony Blair was able to ignore the protests and continued war preparations.
Prevented war with Iraq in 2013
However, this movement was incredibly influential, as it blighted Blair's name, and those of his merry band of revisionists, and showed their immorality in the public sphere.
Despite this movement failing, it was still undoubtably influential, as it challenged the government, and influenced public opinion on a major scale.
Even if the aim of a pressure group is not fully achieved, 'minor' changes amount to major societal improvement over time - large influence on humanity and the UK
The source also makes the argument that pressure groups aren't influential as 'they're not a major part of current day UK political controversies'
The source remarks that 'the real influence on political life is with the parties and their leaders', implying that pressure groups are of little influence as they do not hold the power and are an unimportant part of life - can't make a difference
Example - After the decision to build a high-speed railway, Stop HS2 tried to campaign against its construction.
Lab, Cons and Lib Dems were all in favour and, despite petition in 2020, gov ignored calls for it to be scrapped
Shows that pressure groups aren't considered or respected in regard to political issues, and that parties have the power, not the groups
Shows little influence as often disregarded
On the other hand, it is clear that pressure groups do play a major role in UK political controversies as they are a 'core part' of social movements that respond to said controversies.
The source highlights the 'immense' influence of pressure groups on 'governments', which the source implies are, in theory, the main player in said political controversies
In most instances though, this is not the case as 'few decisions are made... without the inclusion of pressure groups', and so it can be argued that pressure groups are as vital as main political parties in terms of finding solutions for controversies
For example, following Hamas' recent slaughter of Israelis and the IDF's subsequent war crimes, Socialist Appeal and fellow campaigners persuaded Starmer to change his stance from complete support for the IDF's exploits to seeking a two-state solution
Obviously, this is a very polarising issue in the UK that was heavily affected by pressure groups who have, in some ways, defined the battlegrounds for this political controversy
Even when overruled, like in the case of stop HS2, pressure groups do, in fact, have 'major' influence on the UK, as the groups themselves, regardless of outcome, engage much of the population, which can lead into a change in sentiment or policy
Given that... definition
Finally, the weakest argument against my viewpoint is that pressure groups are often ignored by 'a determined government' that's policies and beliefs oppose their wishes, and thus they have little influence.
In theory, if gov has 'a majority' and a 'clear manifesto' it 'will not be stopped' by any pressure group
It can be argued that in many cases govs continue their course of action irrespective of pressure group interference
For example, Stand Up to Racism regularly protested Braverman's illegal immigration bill, and later her plans to force refugees onto the Bibby Stockholm, for the first time
Regardless, plans to deport 3000 per month from Jan 2024, and refugees were forced on to the barge twice
If a gov opposes wishes of pressure groups, they are bound to have little influence, as gov will have no interest in straying from their plans and beliefs
Trapped in a cycle of little influence
OTOH a lack of immediate 'influence and impact' on gov policy does not negate the considerable influence pressure group interference has on the public and, often, pressure groups do actually affect gov policy
The source remarks that 'even strong governments back down' when faced by pressure groups, supported by 'public opinion', showing that, in many cases, PG have direct influence on gov
TUC and the National Minimum Wage Act 1998
In addition, even when pressure groups, such as Palestinian Solidarity campaign, aren't adequately acknowledged by gov, they have major influence - estimated 500,000 people protested in London, and protests throughout UK
Mass support for cause - like one above - can lead to a change in sentiment that influences the UK as a whole
Definition...
Conclusion
Pressure groups have immense influence
Achieve both minor and major goals
Central in political controversies - essential outlet for democratic engagement
Pressure groups have affected government policy many times in the past, can be thanked for rights of women and minorities
If pressure groups were to abandon direct action and seek compromise rather than justice, my mind might change x