1/26
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
attachment
bond between infant and caregiver, occurs regardless of quality of care, can also occur in adulthood
attachment: behaviorists vs. harlow
behaviorists: attachment develops because of classical conditioning and nourishment, harlow: attachment develops because caregivers provide a sense of security
bowlby’s attachment theory
humans are biologically predisposed to form attachments to caregivers because they increase chances of survival
bowlby’s secure base
presence of caregiver enables kids to survie, explore environment, and coregulate
bowlby’s internal working model of attachment
child’s mental representations of self, attachment figures, and relationships, develops as a result of caregiver interactions
ainsworth’s strange situation
empirically study bowlby’s theory, measured how much an infant viewed their caregiver as a secure base
ainsworth attachment categories - secure
caregiver is secure base, child is distressed when caregiver leaves and is comforted by caregiver’s return
ainsworth attachment categories - insecure/avoidant
ignore caregivers, turn away from them, don’t seek comfort
ainsworth attachment categories - insecure/resistant
clingy, won’t explore, extreme distress when caregiver leaves, seeks comfort, but is angry and resistant when comfort is provided
ainsworth attachment categories - disorganized/disoriented
confusing and contradictory behavior, want to approach caregiver but is afraid of them and withdraws, on a spectrum
secure attachment and socioemotional development
better adjustment, more social skills, more prosocial, less health problemsi
individual differences in attachment - parental sensitivity
warm and responsive parents → secure infants
individual differences in attachment - childcare
low quality childcare interferes with attachment
individual differences in attachment - genetic influences
genetic makeup x attachment links last into adulthood
self-concept
thoughts and attitudes about one’s physical being, social characteristics, internal characteristics
-dynamic
-develops through interactions
infant self concept
rudimentary, ability to differentiate self from environment, linked to attachment and feedback from parents, ability to recognize self
childhood self concept
complexity increases, social comparison, self-conscious emotions
adolescent self concept
self perceived as abstract, egocentrism, belief in uniqueness of thoughts and feelings, belief that everyone else is focused on them
self-esteem
high = feel good about self, hopeful, low = worthless, hopeless, mental health problems
sources of self-esteem
age (low in adolescence), physical attributes, gender (boys higher), parenting style, peers, schools
self-identity
description of the self imposed by environment, develops during adolescence
Erikson self-identity
all adolescents experience identity crisis to separate from parents
Marcia self-identity
identity development falls on dimensions of identity exploration and commitment
Marcia self-identity status: identity achievement
explored potential identities and committed to one
Marcia self-identity status: identity foreclosure
did not explore but committed to an identity based on others’ values or choices
Marcia self-identity status: moratorium
exploring but no committment
Marica self-identity status: identity diffusion
no exploring and no commitment