1/43
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Affiliation/ Prosocial behavior
brings individuals together
pair bonding
courtship
parental behaviors
Aggression/antisocial behavior
keeps individuals apart
territorial behavior
dominance behavior
Territories in female meadow voles
patterns of aggression and sociality can change seasonally in some species
in summer, female meadow voles defend their territories from male and female conspecifics
in winter, female meadow voles form strong same sex partner differences and behave more socially toward conspecifics
Why do animals form social bonds
seems to have evolved from reproduction and parental behavior
short term associations for mating have evolved into longer term social bonds
some of the hormones and neural circuits involved in parental bonding have been co-opted for other social behaviors
Nonapeptide hormones in vertebrates
hormones that promote affiliation are proximate mechanisms that facilitate monogomy
alththough peptide sequences have evolved, functions have been conserved across vertebrate classes
Bonding in humans
romantic and maternal love evoke similar brain activity
images of one’s lover or one’s child induce activity in brain circuits involved with reward
reward circuits also included brain areas rich in dopamine
these areas also have high levels or oxytocin and vasopressin, which are involved in social attachment in non-human animals
Oxytocin and human bonding
bonding facilitates cooperation
also biases perception
e.g. parter attractiveness
Is affiliation adaptive?
long-term pair bonds between mothers and fathers are necessary in some species to successfully rear young, so cooperation/affiliation has evolved
pair bonding may also leas to more efficient mating, as there is no need to readjust behavior based on a new partner’s habits
Pair bonding is uncommon among mammals
~3% of all mammals
~15% of all primates
Monogomous voles
prairie vole and pine vole
pair bond
social puberty inhibition
males become aggressive towards intruders after mating
Polygamous voles
meadow vole and montane vole
no pair bond
no puberty inhibition
males are not around to assist with an intruder
Pair bonding in voles
monogamous species prefer to spend time with their previous mate
polygynous vole species show no social preference
Testosterone in social behavior of voles
male prairie voles have about half the circulating T concentration as polygynous male voles
increasing T experimentally does not make them polygynous
meadow and montane voles have high levels of circulating T
castration does not Mae them monogamous
OT binding differs across species
higher OTR in monogamous mice across brain except for the lateral septum (reversed pattern)
Female mechanisms for pair bond
Oxytocin antagonist into the nucleus accumbens and the prefrontal cortex prevents pair bond formation
Male mechanisms for pair bond
vasopressin 1a receptor antagonist (V1aRA) into the ventral pallium prevents pair bond formation
neurocircuitry involved in mating in prairie voles
VTA activation results in dopamine release, leading to reinforcement and reward learning
neurocircuitry involved in pair-bonding in prairie voles
concurrent activation of neuropeptide and dopamine receptors in the reward centers during mating results in a conditioned partner preference, observed as a pair bond
differential regulation of neuropeptide receptor expression likely explains species differences in the ability to form pair bonds
Dog and human bonds
oxytocin in owners
differences in face musculature and muscle physiology between wolves and domestic dogs
V1aR overexpression ______ social bonding
facilitates
types of aggression
parental
territorial
intermale aggression
predatory
most aggression is associated with males
increases at puberty
changes with seasons
castration/replacement effects are predictable
male aggression
fight to increase reproductive success:
gain and maintain resources
defend females
increase social status
Aggression and Testosterone
elevated testosterone
grow and maintain antlers
antlers regrow seasonally
weapons for aggression
seasonal changes in male red deer
mating coincides with peaks in circulating T, male antler growth, and aggression in the population
Amputating antlers causes
a drop in social rank without influencing hormones
Exogenous T treatment can lead to male deer
maintaining antlers out of season. These males tend to rise in social rank
Testosterone can
increase territorial aggression —> beneficial: access to resources
decrease immune function, parental care, and deplete energy resources
Male mountain spiny lizards with T implants
more aggressive
more active during the day
patrol more
do more pushups
use a third more energy than controls
deplete energy supplies and die sooner
spend much less time foraging
Top ranking wild baboons
are most stressed. Being second in the hierarchy may come with more benefits than being at the top
In some primate species, females compete for males
as ovulation approaches
Female Syrian hamster aggression
live in burrows and fend off intruders
estrogen and progesterone (estrus) inhibit aggression, which allows males to mate without injury
Effects of hormones on hamster aggression
female Serbian hamsters are more aggressive during non-breeding periods (short days) than during breeding periods (long days)
likely, estrogen and progesterone inhibit aggression during breeding conditions
_______ influences androgen concentration
Melatonin
seasonal “switch”
shift from gonadal to adrenal regulation of aggression
_________ modulates aggression in response to day length in females
estrogen
Effects of estradiol on aggression
fast increase in aggression (20 min after treatment) —> non genomic effects
no treatment effect on aggression during the breeding season
Behavior can influence hormones
male Syrian hamsters that lose fights have reduced androgen levels for many days
rhesus monkeys that are defeated by high-ranking males have reduced testosterone levels for weeks, while winners have immediate increases (up to 400%) in testosterone
similar effects have been demonstrated in human athletic competition and even presidential races
The challenge hypothesis and testosterone
in some species (usually monogamous), challenges are met with temporary increases in circulating T
The challenge hypothesis
In polygynous species:
males that experienced simulated territorial intrusions did not have higher testosterone levels than males that experienced no intruders
In monogomous species:
testosterone levels do rise after simulated territorial intrusions
usually have low testosterone levels except when competing with other males
Blood T concentrations in birds may reflect competition
in some species, peaks in male T levels are tied to
territory acquisition
defense of fertile mates
High T in males is sometimes incompatible with colony nesting
Components of a homeostatic system
set point
detection mechanism
mobilization
recognition
Homeostasis: physiology and behavior
some systems regulated by physiology
body temp in endothermic species
some by behavior
body temp in exothermic species
some by both
fluid balance; feeding and body weight