Equity

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/6

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 11:59 PM on 6/17/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

7 Terms

1
New cards

Equity jurisdiction

—DE Court of Chancery has jurisdiction when (1) case involves equitable claims, (2) plaintiff requests equitable relief, (3) statute confers jurisdiction; may apply cleanup doctrine to address other nonequitable (legal) issues in case

2
New cards

Jury trial

—court has discretion to send issues of fact to be tried by jury in court of law (rarely exercised)

3
New cards

Declaratory judgments

—no jurisdiction for declaratory relief unless allegations are directed toward enforcement of exclusively equitable right or are sufficient to establish no adequate remedy at law

4
New cards

Enforceability of equitable remedies

—directly enforceable by court through contempt

5
New cards

General requirement

—inadequate remedy at law

6
New cards

Equitable relief available only when no adequate remedy at law

  • Subject matter of litigation is unique

  • Damages are uncertain or speculative

  • Multiple and successive lawsuits would be required to get relief at law

  • Judgment at law is uncollectible (e.g., defendant is insolvent) or

  • Plaintiff’s injury cannot be fully compensated by money judgment

7
New cards

Limits on equitable relief

  1. Impracticability—balance burden on court in enforcing and supervising performance of relief against advantages gained and harms avoided by providing relief

  2. Infringement on constitutional rights

  3. Interference with sovereignty of another state or country

  4. Protection solely of personal rights—relief may be denied unless there is violation of constitutionally protected civil right or harm that shocks court’s conscience