1/16
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
nature
any innate capacities and structures children are born with
nurture
what people gain from experience
argument against language as operant conditioning
poverty of stimulus - input not enough to explain how kids learn complex rules
speed and universality - all kids learn all kinds of language quickly and easily = innate languafe acquisition
creative/productive use of language
kanzi
bonobo trained from yonug age to communicate using lexigram system
symbolic communication
some grammatical constructions
consistent word order (syntax)
understood novel sentences
limitations of Kanzi
no function words (the, is)
limited morphology
short sentence length
no complex syntax
what does kanzi tell us
animals have some qualitative aspects of language but humans have vast quantitative advantage in complexity and productivity = language development strongly influenced by social interaction and communication with others
brain regions for language
brocas in left inferior frontal gyrus = speech production - adjacent to part of motor control area for jaws, lips and tongue
wernickes in left superior temporal gyrus - comprehension - adjacent to primary auditory area that receives linguistic input
unique to humans
broac’s aphasia
slow poor and ungrammatical speech but can understand language
wernicke’s area
fluent speech that lacks sense
logical problem of language acquisition
children make and understand infinite sentences they never hear before = innate capacity for acquisition
rules for forming sentences are non-obvious - how do we learn them?
feedback/negative evidence
1 answer for logical problem - we try saying things and told when we are wrong
but children don’t usually have grammer corrected
universal gramemr
humans born with innate capacity for language with set of underlying gramamtical rules common to all language = children able to learn natural grammer with limited input
linguistic universals
Greenburg compared syntax of 30 languages on 5 continents and found 45 universals
absolute - no language forms questions by reversing word order
general - all languages make certain distinctions (noun-verb) and all have vowels and consonants
stats - subjects precede objects
implicational - if language has X will have Y
large language models
deep network capable of predicting long units of text trained on enormous amounts of data
context-aware representations
creative language generation
driving forces of language acquisition
input, social interaction and variation
less-is-more principle
limited cognitive resources incl working memory might actually help children acquire language
child-directed speech
way caregivers speak to infants
phonology - slower, exaggerated intonation, higher and wider pitch
vocab - concrete words, stuff that interests kids
morphology/syntax - simplify forms, incomplete sentences but mostly syntactically correct