REM502 Research Methodologies - Assessment 1 Flashcards

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
full-widthPodcast
1
Card Sorting

1/16

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary-style flashcards covering the requirements, learning outcomes, and assessment criteria for the REM502 Critical Literature Review.

Last updated 9:03 AM on 6/24/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

17 Terms

1
New cards

Assessment 1 Type

A Critical Literature Review of 1,500 words (+/- 10%).

2
New cards

Assessment 1 Weighting

30% of the total marks for the subject REM502.

3
New cards

Subject Learning Outcome (SLO) a

Identify Challenges and opportunities for Research and Development (R&D) in the Information Communication Technology (ICT) Sector.

4
New cards

Subject Learning Outcome (SLO) b

Critically examine relevant literature and the industry landscape to identify gaps and formulate research questions and objectives pertinent to the ICT domain.

5
New cards

Subject Learning Outcome (SLO) e

Integrate ethical principles related to the design of R&D solutions.

6
New cards

Purpose of a Literature Review

To gain an understanding of the existing body of research, industry ICT trends, and debates, involving a summary and critical evaluation of strengths and weaknesses of accessed sources.

7
New cards

Iterative Process

The understanding that research elements such as the abstract, statement, gaps, and questions may change based on findings during literature search and methodologies chosen.

8
New cards

Research Proposal (Assessment 3)

The final report and presentation due in Week 12 for which Assessment 1 provides academic substantiation and methodology rationale.

9
New cards

Source Currency Requirement

Sources published within the last 5 years are preferred to reflect the newest discoveries and avoid duplication.

10
New cards

Minimum Source Quantity

A minimum of 8 recently published peer-reviewed sources including journal articles, books, and conference papers.

11
New cards

Reputable Source Threshold

80% of reviewed papers must be credible scholarly materials (journal articles, books, and conference papers) and 80% must be reputable sources.

12
New cards

Critical Evaluation Expectation

Detailed commentary on the analysis of strengths and weaknesses; students must summarize findings and add interpretations rather than cutting and pasting the abstract.

13
New cards

Referencing Style

APA 7th referencing style guidelines must be used for in-text citations and the reference list.

14
New cards

Library Database Access

The Torrens University Australia library website (https://library.torrens.edu.au/home) providing access to peer-reviewed papers via the 'All databases' link.

15
New cards

Critique Rubric Criterion

An analysis and evaluation of sources worth 30% of the assessment, requiring a summary of ideas and a clear rationale for the study aim.

16
New cards

High Distinction Topic Requirement

A clear, specific topic that advances knowledge in the area by identifying and fully addressing current challenges in the IT/SE context.

17
New cards

Effective Communication (Written)

A 20% rubric criterion evaluating how information is structured, sequenced, and if specialized language/terminology is precisely employed.