1/14
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
How did sovereign states differ structurally from universalist systems?
Sovereign states had clear territorial boundaries and centralized monarchies capable of enforcing laws, collecting taxes, and raising armies — unlike universalist systems (papacy, Holy Roman Empire) whose authority was diffuse and contested.
How did sovereign states handle crises and warfare more effectively?
Decision‑making was concentrated in a single ruler, allowing rapid responses to crises. They controlled warfare through professional armies and new technologies, while universal systems struggled to coordinate military power.
What social and political advantages did sovereign states gain?
They fostered strong national identities (e.g., during the Hundred Years’ War) and reduced the influence of rival powers like the papacy or nobility, consolidating authority in the monarch and strengthening the state.
How did the Hundred Years’ War reshape France and England politically?
France emerged as a strong, centralized monarchy, expelling the English from nearly all continental territory. England lost its French possessions, turning inward and facing instability that led to the Wars of the Roses (1455–1487).
What military and social changes resulted from the war?
The longbow, gunpowder, and cannons revolutionized warfare, ending the dominance of knights and castles. Monarchs relied on professional armies, reducing the prestige of the nobility and weakening feudal structures.
How did the war affect national identity and morale?
It fostered strong national identities — “Englishness” and “Frenchness” — replacing feudal loyalties. Joan of Arc’s leadership boosted French morale and symbolized divine favor for Charles VII, reinforcing royal legitimacy.
What triggered the War of the Roses?
A dynastic struggle between two branches of the Plantagenet family — the House of York (white rose) and the House of Lancaster (red rose) — each claiming the right to rule England.
What political events deepened the war of the roses?
England was unstable after the Hundred Years’ War, and the death of Edward IV caused a succession crisis. Richard III seized power by imprisoning Edward V and his brother in the Tower of London, where they died — an event that delegitimized Richard’s rule.
How did noble rivalries escalate the war of the roses?
Aristocratic factions exploited the uncertainty, forming competing alliances that turned the dispute into civil war. Long‑standing noble rivalries and ambitions fueled the fighting, making the war a struggle for control of the English crown.
What event initiated Spain’s political unification?
The marriage of Ferdinand II of Aragon and Isabella of Castile (1469) united the two largest Iberian kingdoms under one royal couple, creating a dynastic union that coordinated policy, warfare, and administration.
How did Ferdinand and Isabella complete the process of unification?
They completed the Reconquista by conquering Granada (1492), expelling the last Muslim rulers. The fall of Granada symbolized the unification of Christian Spain under a single monarchic authority.
What were the long-term effects of their rule?
Their reign strengthened centralized royal power, reduced noble autonomy, and laid the foundations of the sovereign state of Spain, marking the transition from medieval kingdoms to a unified nation.
What was the Kalmar Union and who created it?
The Kalmar Union (1397) joined Denmark, Norway, and Sweden under one monarch, engineered by Margaret I of Denmark, to strengthen Scandinavia against outside powers like the Hanseatic League and German princes.
How was the union structured and what problems arose?
Each kingdom kept its own laws and institutions, making it a personal union, not a centralized state. Denmark’s dominance caused resentment among Swedish nobles, leading to repeated revolts and instability.
How successful was the Kalmar Union overall?
It was only partially successful — briefly unifying Scandinavia but failing to create lasting cohesion. The union collapsed in the early 16th century when Sweden broke away, ending Margaret’s vision of a united north.